| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000049213 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000055573 |
| Scientific Title | The Effect of Using an trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force on Walking Ability in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients undergoing Hemodialysis Therapy |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2022/10/14 |
| Last modified on | 2025/10/30 23:47:31 |
The Effect of Using an trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force on Walking Ability in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients undergoing Hemodialysis Therapy
Effects of an trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force on Gait in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients undergoing Hemodialysis Therapy
The Effect of Using an trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force on Walking Ability in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients undergoing Hemodialysis Therapy
Effects of an trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force on Gait in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients undergoing Hemodialysis Therapy
| Japan |
diabetes
| Endocrinology and Metabolism | Rehabilitation medicine |
Others
NO
To determine the effect of the use of a Trunk Orthosis with joints providing resistive force with potency on gait.
Efficacy
4-meter walking test
Timed up and go test
tired feeling(modified Borg Scale)
Angle of hip extension in Terminal stance
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Self control
1
Treatment
| Other |
Trunk Orthosis with joints providing resistive force
| 20 | years-old | <= |
| 80 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
1. who are admitted to the hospital for dialysis treatment and scheduled to be hospitalized for more than 3 weeks
2. Those who have a prescription for physiotherapy from a rehabilitation physician and are scheduled for intervention for at least 3 weeks.
3. Those who are able to walk more than 6 meters with or without the use of walking aids.
4. Able to understand the instructions
5. who do not meet the contraindications for Trunk Orthosis with joints providing resistive force
6. Patients who fall within the Trunk Orthosis with joints providing resistive force M size (height (about 153 cm to 180 cm) and pelvic girth size (about 70 cm to 105 cm)) that we have at our hospital.
7. 18 years of age or older
Persons who are unable to perform physiotherapy interventions in the rehabilitation room due to infection or other reasons.
6
| 1st name | Kurita |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Shinya |
Tokyo Metropolitan Hospital organization Tokyo Metropolitan Ohkubo Hospital
Department of Rehabilitation
168488
2-44-1 Kabukichou sinjyukuku Tokyo
0352858811
shinya_kurita@tmhp.jp
| 1st name | Kurita |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Shinya |
Tokyo Metropolitan Hospital organization Tokyo Metropolitan Ohkubo Hospital
Department of Rehabilitation
168488
2-44-1 Kabukichou sinjyukuku Tokyo
0352858811
shinya_kurita@tmhp.jp
Tokyo Metropolitan Hospital organization Tokyo Metropolitan Ohkubo Hospital
No
Other
Tokyo Metropolitan Hospital organization Tokyo Metropolitan Ohkubo Hospital
2-44-1 Kabukichou sinjyukuku Tokyo
0352858811
shinya_kurita@tmhp.jp
NO
| 2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 14 | Day |
Nothing
Unpublished
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jatpt/3/1/3_47/_article/-char/ja/
1
During the intervention period with TSC, comfortable walking speed improved from 0.7m/s to 1.0m/s compared with the conventional practice period. The pre-post difference on the modified Borg scale decreased from 3.5 to 2.3. SPPB scores increased from 6 (pre-A) to 8 (post-A) to 10 (post-B). Visual analysis using the standard deviation band method indicated improvement.
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 30 | Day |
Male, 40s type 2, diabetes, CKD stage 5, maintenance hemodialysis (3/week, 20 years). Barthel Index 80, supervised cane gait. Comfortable gait speed 0.53 m/s, SPPB 6.
Assessed for eligibility: n=1
Enrolled: n=1
Allocation: Period A (control) Period B(with orthosis)
Follow-up: no dropout
Analysis: n=1 (full analysis set)
No
Primary outcomes
Comfortable gait speed (m/s; 10-m walk, mean of 3 trials)
Modified Borg scale (pre-post difference)
Secondary outcomes
Timed Up and Go (TUG, s)
SPPB total score (0-12)
Hip extension angle in late stance (2D video analysis/joint angle)
Patient-reported outcome: fatigue VAS
Time points: Pre-A, Post-A, Post-B (all non-dialysis days, immediately after practice)
Safety: Adverse events (falls, pain aggravation, skin problems)
Completed
| 2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 07 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 11 | Day |
| 2023 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
| 2023 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
| 2023 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 13 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 30 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000055573