Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000048589 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000055364 |
Scientific Title | Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia after Extubation with the Positive Pressure versus Normal Pressure Technique: Before and After Observational Study Using the Perioperative Database from the University of Tsukuba Hospital |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2022/08/04 |
Last modified on | 2023/08/10 17:51:48 |
Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia after Extubation with the Positive Pressure versus Normal Pressure Technique: Before and After Observational Study Using a Perioperative Database from the University of Tsukuba Hospital
Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia after Extubation with the Positive Pressure versus Normal Pressure Technique: Before and After Observational Study
Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia after Extubation with the Positive Pressure versus Normal Pressure Technique: Before and After Observational Study Using the Perioperative Database from the University of Tsukuba Hospital
Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia after Extubation with the Positive Pressure versus Normal Pressure Technique: Before and After Observational Study
Japan |
Postoperative pneumonia
Anesthesiology |
Others
NO
The objective is to compare the risk of postoperative pneumonia after extubation with positive pressure to normal pressure technique. The Department of Anesthesiology at the University of Tsukuba Hospital had been performing a positive pressure technique for extubation after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. However, after the outbreak of coronavirus-19 infection, the extubation technique was changed from the positive pressure technique to a normal pressure technique in order to prevent droplet infection during extubation. Although the positive pressure technique is theoretically effective in preventing aspiration pneumonia, no human studies have confirmed its efficacy. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative pneumonia between positive and normal pressure techniques.
Efficacy
Postoperative pneumonia
Observational
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
The perioperative database from the University of Tsukuba Hospital has patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, or epidural anesthesia at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2022.
Among them, patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation are included.
Patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia without tracheal intubation. Patients who underwent surgery under spinal or epidural anesthesia.
Those who refused to participate in the study as a result of opting out.
35000
1st name | Nanako |
Middle name | |
Last name | Tamiya |
University of Tsukuba
Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine
305-8575
1-1-1 Tenno-dai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
+81-(0)29-853-8849
hsr@md.tsukuba.ac.jp
1st name | Kensuke |
Middle name | |
Last name | Shimada |
University of Tsukuba
Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences
305-8575
1-1-1 Tenno-dai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
+81-(0)29-853-8849
hsr@md.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba
University of Tsukuba
Other
University of Tsukuba Hospital
2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
029-853-3914
t-credo.adm@un.tsukuba.ac.jp
YES
R03-068
University of Tsukuba Hospital
筑波大学附属病院(茨城県)
2022 | Year | 08 | Month | 04 | Day |
Unpublished
20011
Completed
2022 | Year | 05 | Month | 27 | Day |
2022 | Year | 05 | Month | 27 | Day |
2022 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
2023 | Year | 08 | Month | 31 | Day |
This study is the before and after observational study using a perioperative database from the University of Tsukuba Hospital. The database has patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, or epidural anesthesia at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2022. Among them, patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation are included.
The Department of Anesthesiology at the University of Tsukuba Hospital had been performing a positive pressure technique for extubation after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. However, after the outbreak of coronavirus-19 infection, the extubation technique was changed from the positive pressure technique to a normal pressure technique in order to prevent droplet infection during extubation. Although the positive pressure technique is theoretically effective in preventing aspiration pneumonia, no human studies have confirmed its efficacy. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative pneumonia between positive and normal pressure techniques.
2022 | Year | 08 | Month | 04 | Day |
2023 | Year | 08 | Month | 10 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000055364