Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000045892 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000052393 |
Scientific Title | Clinical study on the efficacy of H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit. Testing with stool and gastric wash waste. |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/11/01 |
Last modified on | 2021/10/28 09:44:24 |
Clinical study on the efficacy of H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit.
Testing with stool and gastric wash waste.
Clinical study on the efficacy of H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit.
Testing with stool and gastric wash waste.
Clinical study on the efficacy of H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit.
Testing with stool and gastric wash waste.
Clinical study on the efficacy of H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit.
Testing with stool and gastric wash waste.
Japan |
Helicobacter pylori infection
Hepato-biliary-pancreatic medicine | Infectious disease |
Others
NO
We evaluate the efficacy of the each H. pylori molecular diagnostic kits using stool and gastric wash waste compared with conventional H. pylori diagnostic methods as a control.
Efficacy
For H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit using gastric wash waste, evaluation of the correlation with H. pylori conventional diagnostic method (urea breath test, stool antigen test, culture) and evaluation of the concordance with clarithromycin antibiotic susceptibility test.
For H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit using stool, evaluation of the sensitivity compared with stool antigen test, and evaluation of the concordance with clarithromycin antibiotic susceptibility test.
Observational
15 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
Patients who meet all of the following conditions
(1) Patients suspected of H. pylori infection and recommended to undergo endoscopy
(2) Patients who consented to conduct a urea breath test (UBT) and submit stool (stool H. pylori antigen test) before endoscopy
(3) 15 years old and over
Patients who meet any of the following conditions
(1) Patients who did not obtain sufficient samples for the study
(2) Patients who have already received H. pylori eradication treatment
(3) Patients with serious disabilities
(4) Pregnant or potentially pregnant patients
(5) Other patients who the attending physician has determined to be unable to participate in the study
150
1st name | Mototsugu |
Middle name | |
Last name | Kato |
National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital
Department of Gastroenterology
041-8512
18-16 Kawahara-cho, Hakodate City, Hokkaido, Japan
0138-51-6281
kato.mototsugu.ym@mail.hosp.go.jp
1st name | Koichi |
Middle name | |
Last name | Ebisu |
MIZUHO MEDY Co., Ltd.
R&D Planning Dept.
841-0048
5-4 Fujinoki-Machi, Tosu City, Saga, Japan
0942-85-0301
ebisu@mizuho-m.co.jp
MIZUHO MEDY Co., Ltd.
MIZUHO MEDY Co., Ltd.
Profit organization
National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, Ethics Review Boad
18-16 Kawahara-cho, Hakodate City, Hokkaido, Japan
0138-51-6281
102-kanrikat@mail.hosp.go.jp
NO
2021 | Year | 11 | Month | 01 | Day |
Unpublished
Unpublished
143
For H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit using gastric wash waste, concordance ratio compared with H. pylori conventional diagnostic method were 93.6% for urea breath test, 93.2% for stool antigen test and 97.9% for culture. And concordance rate with clarithromycin antibiotic susceptibility test was 97.0%.
For H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit using stool, sensitivity compared with stool antigen test was 84.2%. And concordance rate with clarithromycin antibiotic susceptibility test was 100%.
2021 | Year | 10 | Month | 28 | Day |
143 out of 151 patients enrolled participated (Male 54/Female 89, Median age: 64 with range of 19-90)
Obtained informed consent from patients suspected H. pylori infection. 143 out of 151 patients enrolled participated. Participants underwent an conventional H. pylori infection diagnostic method (urea breath test, stool antigen test, culture, antibiotic susceptibility test) and EGD (Esophagogastroduodenoscopy) . Stool and gastric wash waste were collected from the participants. Using the collected samples, evaluation of H. pylori molecular diagnostic kits, real-time PCR method, and sequencing were carried out.
No adverse events were observed.
For H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit using gastric wash waste, concordance ratio compared with H. pylori conventional diagnostic method were 93.6% for urea breath test, 93.2% for stool antigen test and 97.9% for culture. And concordance rate with clarithromycin antibiotic susceptibility test was 97.0%.
For H. pylori molecular diagnostic kit using stool, sensitivity compared with stool antigen test was 84.2%. And concordance rate with clarithromycin antibiotic susceptibility test was 100%.
Completed
2019 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
2019 | Year | 09 | Month | 09 | Day |
2019 | Year | 12 | Month | 04 | Day |
2021 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
Obtained informed consent from patients suspected H. pylori infection. 143 out of 151 patients enrolled participated. Participants underwent an conventional H. pylori infection diagnostic method (urea breath test, stool antigen test, culture, antibiotic susceptibility test) and EGD (Esophagogastroduodenoscopy) . Stool and gastric wash waste were collected from the participants. Using the collected samples, evaluation of H. pylori molecular diagnostic kits, real-time PCR method, and sequencing were carried out.
2021 | Year | 10 | Month | 28 | Day |
2021 | Year | 10 | Month | 28 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000052393