| Recruitment status | Open public recruiting |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000045804 |
| Receipt No. | R000052292 |
| Scientific Title | Is neuroimaging useful in predicting for prognosis of unilateral spatial neglect in the patients with stroke?: a systematic review |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/10/20 |
| Last modified on | 2021/10/20 (Ver. 1) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Is neuroimaging useful in predicting for prognosis of unilateral spatial neglect in the patients with stroke?: a systematic review | |
| Acronym | Is neuroimaging useful in predicting for prognosis of unilateral spatial neglect in the patients with stroke?: a systematic review | |
| Scientific Title | Is neuroimaging useful in predicting for prognosis of unilateral spatial neglect in the patients with stroke?: a systematic review | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Is neuroimaging useful in predicting for prognosis of unilateral spatial neglect in the patients with stroke?: a systematic review | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Stroke | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | Objective of this systematic review is to consolidate evidence regarding the use of neuroimaging in predicting prognosis of unilateral spatial neglect in the patient with stroke |
| Basic objectives2 | Others |
| Basic objectives -Others | Usefulness |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Neglect testing |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| Base | |
| Study type | Others,meta-analysis etc |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | P (participants): stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect
E (exposure): neuroimaging C (comparison): N/A O (outcome): neglect testing |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | Research articles which does not meet PECO | |||
| Target sample size | ||||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Hiroshima Cosmopolitan University | ||||||
| Division name | Department of Rehabilitation | ||||||
| Zip code | 731-3166 | ||||||
| Address | 1-2-3, Otsuka-higashi, Asaminami-ku, Hiroshima | ||||||
| TEL | 082-849-6883 | ||||||
| imura@hcu.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Hiroshima Cosmopolitan University | ||||||
| Division name | Department of Rehabilitation | ||||||
| Zip code | 731-3166 | ||||||
| Address | 1-2-3, Otsuka-higashi, Asaminami-ku, Hiroshima | ||||||
| TEL | 082-849-6883 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| imura@hcu.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Hiroshima Cosmopolitan University |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | N/A |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | N/A |
| Address | N/A |
| Tel | n.a |
| n.a | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| Result | |
| URL related to results and publications | |
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | |
| Results | |
| Results date posted | |
| Results Delayed | |
| Results Delay Reason | |
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |
| Baseline Characteristics | |
| Participant flow | |
| Adverse events | |
| Outcome measures | |
| Plan to share IPD | |
| IPD sharing Plan description | |
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Open public recruiting | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | Search strategy and study selection
The Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and SCOPUS electronic databases were comprehensively searched. After excluding duplicates, two reviewers will independently screen each article based on the title and abstract using predetermined eligibility criteria in order to determine relevant manuscripts for full text review. Subsequently, full text copies of articles that are not excluded based on the title or abstract were retrieved, and the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be reapplied to these studies to determine suitability for final inclusion. Any disagreements during the article screening and selection will be resolved through discussion, and decisions will be made by a third person if the two reviewers will not reach a consensus. Data extraction Predesigned spreadsheets that were created using Microsoft Excel 2019 will be used to extract data on participants, exposures, outcome measurements, and results. Two reviewers will discuss and decide on the extraction data, and a third person will confirm. Risk of bias evaluation in individual studies To evaluate the risk of bias in each study, two researchers will independently apply the tool to assess risk of bias in cohort studies (the Cochrane risk of bias instrument). |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000052292 |