| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000045607 |
| Receipt No. | R000052069 |
| Scientific Title | Efficacy of reulgolix in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/09/29 |
| Last modified on | 2022/02/28 (Ver. 3) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Efficacy of reulgolix in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles | |
| Acronym | Efficacy of reulgolix in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles | |
| Scientific Title | Efficacy of reulgolix in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Efficacy of reulgolix in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | infertility | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To validate the efficacy of relugolix in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles. |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | The number of retrieved oocytes. |
| Key secondary outcomes | The number of mature oocytes (metaphase II).
The number of cleavage stage embryos (Veeck's classification 1 to 3) The detail of adverse-event |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Non-randomized |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | cetrorelix acetate (Cetrotide; Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) 0.25 mg/day or ganirelix acetate (GANIREST; MSD KK a subsidiary of Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA) 0.25 mg/day | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | 40 mg/day of relugolix (RELUMINA; ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | 1) patients who were scheduled for oocyte retrieval at our clinic and planned to undergo a COS cycle with an antagonist or natural protocols, and 2) patients who could provide written consent | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | None | |||
| Target sample size | 1000 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic | ||||||
| Division name | Gynecology | ||||||
| Zip code | 5300011 | ||||||
| Address | Grand Front Osaka Tower B15F, 3-1 Ohfuka-cho, Kita-ku, Osaka City | ||||||
| TEL | +81663778824 | ||||||
| komiya520@ivfjapan.com | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic | ||||||
| Division name | Gynecology | ||||||
| Zip code | 5300011 | ||||||
| Address | Grand Front Osaka Tower B15F, 3-1 Ohfuka-cho, Kita-ku, Osaka City | ||||||
| TEL | +81663778824 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| komiya520@ivfjapan.com | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic |
| Address | Grand Front Osaka Tower B15F, 3-1 Ohfuka-cho, Kita-ku, Osaka City |
| Tel | +81663778824 |
| komiya520@ivfjapan.com | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | none |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rmb2.12448 | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 785 | ||||||
| Results | The number of retrieved oocytes in the relugolix group was similar to that in the control group when serum E2 values were < 3,000 pg/mL (p = 0.86). However, the number of retrieved oocytes in the relugolix group was significantly lower than that in the control group when serum E2 values were > 3,000 pg/mL (p = 0.04). | ||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results |
|
||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | There were no significant differences in the patients' background data, except for the LH concentration on the trigger day. | ||||||
| Participant flow | A total of 1,739 COS cycles in the antagonist or natural protocol were obtained during the inclusion period, and 18 (1.0 %) were canceled owing to an inadequate ovarian response to stimulation. Finally, 1,721 COS cycles were analyzed. | ||||||
| Adverse events | In the relugolix group, four (1.6%) patients had fatigue and mild headache, but there were no severe cases. There were also no cases of apparent intra-abdominal hemorrhage, severe ovarian hemorrhage, intra-abdominal infection, or severe OHSS, although there was minor vaginal wall bleeding during oocyte retrieval. | ||||||
| Outcome measures | The number of retrieved oocytes in the relugolix group was similar to that in the control group when serum E2 values were < 3,000 pg/mL (p = 0.86). However, the number of retrieved oocytes in the relugolix group was significantly lower than that in the control group when serum E2 values were > 3,000 pg/mL (p = 0.04). The same results were obtained when the evaluation measurements were the number of mature oocytes and the number of embryos at the cleavage stage. | ||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000052069 |