Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000044376 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000050690 |
Scientific Title | Antibiotic prophylaxis of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: network meta-analysis |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/05/31 |
Last modified on | 2022/11/18 16:59:47 |
Antibiotic prophylaxis of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: network meta-analysis
Antibiotic prophylaxis of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: network meta-analysis
Antibiotic prophylaxis of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: network meta-analysis
Antibiotic prophylaxis of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: network meta-analysis
Japan |
endophthalmitis after cataract surgery
Ophthalmology |
Others
NO
Cataract surgery is the most commonly performed procedure in many industrialized countries, and its frequency continues to increase. Reasons for this include changes in the demographic composition of the population, improved technologies.
Endophthalmitis is an inflammation of the lumen of the eye, usually caused by an infection. It is a possible complication of all intraocular surgeries, especially cataract surgery, and can lead to loss of vision. The most common cause of postoperative endophthalmitis is bacteria directly inoculated by the surgery. Therefore, perioperative antibiotic is a reasonable strategy to reduce the risk of postoperative endophthalmitis. In daily practice, a variety of antibiotics has been used to prevent post-operative endophthalmitis and they can be administrated as irrigation during the operation, intracameral injection, or topical administration. However, benefit of antibiotic use had not been sufficiently clear until recently mainly because incidence of post cataract surgery endophthalmitis is less than 0.1%. Thus, pooled analysis was warranted for this topic. Published meta-analyses revealed that perioperative intracameral vancomycin/moxifloxacin, anterior chamber injection of moxifloxacin after cataract surgery, and intracameral cefuroxime and moxifloxacin after cataract surgery reduce the risk of endophthalmitis compared to no antibiotic prophylaxis. However, the best antibiotic type and the best administration route for cataract surgery are still not known. The current systematic review is to reveal the preferred antibiotics using data from both randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
Efficacy
endophthalmitis after cataract surgery
Others,meta-analysis etc
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies will be included as long as they were written in English language and provided sufficient data. Conference abstract are permitted.
Eyes with cataracts after surgery will be analyzed.
NA
1st name | Nobuyuki |
Middle name | |
Last name | Horita |
Yokohama City University Hospital
Chemotherapy Center
236-0004
3-9, Kanazawa, Fukuura, Yokohama
+810081457872800
horitano@yokohama-cu.ac.jp
1st name | Nobuyuki |
Middle name | |
Last name | Horita |
Yokohama City University Hospital
Chemotherapy Center
236-0004
3-9, Kanazawa, Fukuura, Yokohama
+810081457872800
horitano@yokohama-cu.ac.jp
Yokohama City University Hospital
Yokohama City University Hospital
Self funding
Yokohama C
3-9, Kanazawa, Fukuura, Yokohama
+810081457872800
horitano@yokohama-cu.ac.jp
NO
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36258003/
Published
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36258003/
6809732
Intracameral injection of vancomycin had the best preventive effect (odds ratio [OR] 0.03, 99.6% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-0.53, corrected P-value = 0.006, P-score = 0.945) followed by intracameral injection of cefazoline (OR 0.09, 99.6% CI 0.02-0.42, corrected P-value < 0.001, P-score = 0.821), cefuroxime (OR 0.18, 99.6% CI 0.09-0.35, corrected P-value < 0.001, P-score = 0.660), and moxifloxacin (OR 0.36, 99.6% CI 0.16-0.79, corrected P-value = 0.003, P-score = 0.455).
2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 18 | Day |
See:
Ai Kato et al. Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 18;12(1):17416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21423-w.
See:
Ai Kato et al. Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 18;12(1):17416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21423-w.
See:
Ai Kato et al. Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 18;12(1):17416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21423-w.
See:
Ai Kato et al. Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 18;12(1):17416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21423-w.
Main results already published
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
Any antibiotics via any route will be accepted. Combined regimen with two or more antibiotics were also allowed.
Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale for cohort studies will be used for quality assessment.
Treatment arm should be determined by both antibiotics type and administration route for the main analysis. Sensitivity analyses focusing on only antibiotic type and only administration route are planned.
Proportion of eyes with endophthalmitis will be compared between the two treatment groups using odds ratios (ORs). If one or more cells are null in a two-by-two contingency table, 0.5 will be added to all cells as continuity correction. The logarithm of the ORs and their standard errors will be pooled by the "netmeta" package in R. The logarithm of ORs and their standard errors will be pooled by frequentist weighted least squares approach random-model network meta-analysis.
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 18 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050690