| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000043810 |
| Receipt No. | R000050008 |
| Scientific Title | Comparison between low dose intravenous and caudal dexamethasone as adjuvants to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/05/01 |
| Last modified on | 2021/09/05 (Ver. 4) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | low dose intravenous and caudal dexamethasone in caudal anesthesia | |
| Acronym | low dose intravenous and caudal dexamethasone | |
| Scientific Title | Comparison between low dose intravenous and caudal dexamethasone as adjuvants to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Comparison between low dose intravenous and caudal dexamethasone as adjuvants to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries: low dose intravenous and caudal dexamethasone | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | prospective study | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | efficacy of low dose dexamethasone intravenous and as adjuvant in caudal anesthesia |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Exploratory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Explanatory |
| Developmental phase | Phase II,III |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | the duration of the postoperative caudal analgesia and severity of postoperative pain |
| Key secondary outcomes | Number of rescue analgesic doses, residual motor block, and side effects like nausea and vomiting |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Double blind -all involved are blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | NO |
| Dynamic allocation | YES |
| Institution consideration | Institution is considered as adjustment factor in dynamic allocation. |
| Blocking | NO |
| Concealment | Numbered container method |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 3 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | received caudal analgesia with 0.125% bupivacaine 1ml/kg and ten ml normal saline (IV) | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | received caudal analgesia with bupivacaine 0.125% 1 ml/kg + 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone and ten ml normal saline (IV) | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | caudal analgesia with 0.125% bupivacaine 1ml/kg and dexamethasone 0.1 mg/ kg in ten ml normal saline(IV) | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | ASA I, II | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | coagulopathies, infection at the block targeted site, or with known allergy to any of the drugs included in the study | |||
| Target sample size | 150 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Minia University, Faculty of medicine | ||||||
| Division name | anesthesia and intensive care department | ||||||
| Zip code | 61768 | ||||||
| Address | Minya Elgedida | ||||||
| TEL | 00201023451177 | ||||||
| m.amr274@yahoo.com | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Minya University, Faculty of medicine | ||||||
| Division name | anesthesia and intensive care department | ||||||
| Zip code | 61768 | ||||||
| Address | Minya Elgedida | ||||||
| TEL | 00201023451177 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| m.amr274@yahoo.com | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Minia University, Faculty of medicine
anesthesia and intensive care department |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Minia University, Faculty of medicine
anesthesia and intensive care department |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | Egyptian |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Minya University |
| Address | Minya Elgedida |
| Tel | 00862366100 |
| sara.mohamed@mu.edu.eg | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | Minia University, Faculty of medicine
anesthesia and intensive care department |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | http://www.editorialmanager.com:10161/pcorm/, |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | http://www.editorialmanager.com:10161/pcorm/, | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 150 | ||||||
| Results | Dexamethasone promotes the analgesic effect of caudal bupivacaine either if combined with bupivacaine caudally or via (iv) route compared to the control group. | ||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups including demographic data, ASA classification, type of surgery, and the duration of the surgery | ||||||
| Participant flow | The first analgesic request was significantly prolonged in the caudal dexamethasone group | ||||||
| Adverse events | ide effects reported in the study were PONV, respiratory depression, and shivering. All side effects were comparable in the three groups except nausea and vomiting were significantly fewer in Group IV | ||||||
| Outcome measures | CHIPPS in the postoperative period was comparable between the 3 study groups at the first and third hours, after 6 hours both dexamethasone groups showed lower scores, group D showed significantly lower scores at 24 hours | ||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050008 |