| Recruitment status | Open public recruiting |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000043712 |
| Receipt No. | R000049908 |
| Scientific Title | A comparison of two injection approaches for rectus sheath block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/04/01 |
| Last modified on | 2022/11/25 (Ver. 4) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | A comparison of two injection approaches for rectus sheath block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair | |
| Acronym | A comparison of two injection approaches for rectus sheath block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair | |
| Scientific Title | A comparison of two injection approaches for rectus sheath block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | A comparison of two injection approaches for rectus sheath block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | inguinal hernia | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | Pain at the laparoscopic port insertion site is a postoperative complaint in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Although opioid-based analgesia is extremely effective, it is associated with postoperative side effects such as nausea and vomiting. Multimodal analgesia has recently become well-established because it reduces opioid use by combining non-opioid analgesics with a peripheral nerve block. Rectus sheath block (RSB) and transverse abdominis plane block are effective peripheral nerve blocks for laparoscopic surgery. RSB is simple to perform when surgical incisions are localized to the abdominal midline. Local anesthetic is injected into the space between the rectus abdominis muscle and the posterior layer of the rectus sheath, and spread lenticularly within this space. However, a potential complication of RSB is an internal injury due to peritoneal puncture. Injecting the local anesthetic into the rectus abdominis muscle produces an analgesic effect, reduces the likelihood of peritoneal puncture, and improves the safety of the procedure. We present a comparison of the analgesic effect achieved using the conventional RSB method with injection into the rectus sheath (hereinafter, original method), and the intramuscular RSB method involving injection into the rectus abdominis muscle (intramuscular method). |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | pain level (numerical rating scale), and nausea at 1, 4, 6, and 12 hours after completion of surgery |
| Key secondary outcomes | the time from the nerve block to the first additional analgesic dose
number of additional analgesic doses |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Single blind -participants are blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | Numbered container method |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | 0.25% levobupivacaine 48mL administration into the rectus abdominis muscle under ultrasound guidance, before skin incision.
|
|
| Interventions/Control_2 | Ultrasound-guided rectus abdominis sheath block, with 0.25% levobupivacaine 48mL, before skin incision. | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Patients weighing 50-80kg, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-2, who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | Patients with coagulation disorder, impaired hepatic or renal function, and abnormal platelet counts were excluded from the study. | |||
| Target sample size | 32 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Nagasaki Rosai Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Department of anesthesia | ||||||
| Zip code | 857-0134 | ||||||
| Address | 2-12-5, Setogoe, Sasebo City, Nagasaki, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 0956-49-2191 | ||||||
| hiroshia@terra.dti.ne.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Nagasaki Rosai Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Department of anesthesia | ||||||
| Zip code | 857-0134 | ||||||
| Address | 2-12-5, Setogoe, Sasebo City, Nagasaki, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 0956-49-2191 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| hiroshia@terra.dti.ne.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Nagasaki Rosai Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Nagasaki Rosai Hospital |
| Address | 2-12-5, Setogoe, Sasebo City, Nagasaki, Japan |
| Tel | 0956-49-2191 |
| shomu@nagasakih.johas.go.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 長崎労災病院(長崎県) |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| Result | |
| URL related to results and publications | |
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | |
| Results | |
| Results date posted | |
| Results Delayed | |
| Results Delay Reason | |
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |
| Baseline Characteristics | |
| Participant flow | |
| Adverse events | |
| Outcome measures | |
| Plan to share IPD | |
| IPD sharing Plan description | |
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Open public recruiting | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049908 |