Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000043475 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000049601 |
Scientific Title | Effect of enterally administered sleep-promoting medication on the intravenous sedative dose and its safety and cost profile in mechanically ventilated patients: a retrospective cohort study |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/03/01 |
Last modified on | 2022/07/22 11:37:04 |
Effect of enterally administered sleep-promoting medication on the intravenous sedative dose and its safety and cost profile in mechanically ventilated patients: a retrospective cohort study
Effect of enterally administered sleep-promoting medication on the intravenous sedative dose and its safety and cost profile in mechanically ventilated patients: a retrospective cohort study
Effect of enterally administered sleep-promoting medication on the intravenous sedative dose and its safety and cost profile in mechanically ventilated patients: a retrospective cohort study
Effect of enterally administered sleep-promoting medication on the intravenous sedative dose and its safety and cost profile in mechanically ventilated patients: a retrospective cohort study
Japan |
critical ill patients
Intensive care medicine |
Others
NO
To study the relationship between changes in enteral doses of sleep-promoting medication and intravenous doses of sedatives and prognosis in patients intubated and undergoing ventilatory management.
Efficacy
The average daily propofol dose per body weight administered as a continuous sedative during mechanical ventilation through an oral endotracheal tube.
Observational
15 | years-old | <= |
120 | years-old | > |
Male and Female
Having started mechanical ventilation within 24 hours of ICU admission
Requiring mechanical ventilation using an oral endotracheal tube for at least 48 hours
central nervous system disease (stroke, epilepsy, meningitis, encephalitis, etc.), cardiopulmonary arrest, traumatic brain injury, overdose, gastrointestinal tract impracticability (administration of continuous neuromuscular blockade, abdominal surgery, ileus, gastrointestinal bleeding, etc.), previous psychiatric or cognitive pathology, Child C hepatopathy, pregnancy, previous tracheostomy, ICU readmission, lacking body weight records, death in ICU, and not receiving propofol.
120
1st name | Takefumi |
Middle name | |
Last name | Tsunemitsu |
Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine
660-8550
2-17-77 Higashinaniwa-cho, Amagasaki, Hyogo
06-6480-7000
tsunemitsu0730@yahoo.co.jp
1st name | Takefumi |
Middle name | |
Last name | Tsunemitsu |
Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine
660-8550
2-17-77 Higashinaniwa-cho, Amagasaki, Hyogo
06-6480-7000
tsunemitsu0730@yahoo.co.jp
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
Not Applicable
Other
Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
2-17-77 Higashinaniwa-cho, Amagasaki, Hyogo
0664807000
tsunemitsu0730@yahoo.co.jp
NO
2021 | Year | 03 | Month | 01 | Day |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261305
Published
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261305
123
The average daily propofol dose per body weight administered as a continuous sedative during mechanical ventilation through an oral endotracheal tube was significantly lower in the early administration group (EA group) than in the late administration (LA group) and no administration group (NA group) (Beta Coefficient -5.18 [95% CI -8.95 to -1.40], Beta Coefficient -4.51 [95% CI -8.58 to -0.44]); however, there was no difference between the LA and NA groups (Beta Coefficient 0.66 [95% CI -3.14 to 4.46]).
2021 | Year | 03 | Month | 01 | Day |
The median age of patients of this study was 72 years, 72 % were males, and the median body mass index was 23.1. The SOFA score and Charlson comorbidity index were 6 and 0 in the EA group, 6 and 0 in the LA group, and 7 and 0 in the NA group. Respiratory failure was the most common diagnosis upon ICU admission, especially in the EA group (EA, 22 [60%]; LA, 28 [56%]; NA, 13 [36%]).
We screened 1412 patients and included 123 patients for analysis.
There were no differences between groups in liver damage requiring drug change, ventricular arrhythmia, or unplanned sedative administration. The risk difference of self-extubation were lower in the EA group than in the EA and LA groups (risk difference [RD] -4.00%, p = 0.02; EA vs. NA, RD -5.56%, p = 0.03). Since no patients in the EA group had self-extubation and we could not calculate the odds ratios, self-extubation was assessed through risk difference.
In a multivariate analysis, the mean daily propofol dose per body weight administered as continuous sedation during ventilation with an oral endotracheal tube was significantly lower in the EA group than in the LA and NA group (beta coefficient -5.13 [95% CI, -8.93 to -1.33]; beta coefficient -4.51 [95% CI, -8.59 to -0.43]).
Multivariate analysis showed no significant differences between groups in duration of mechanical ventilation by oral endotracheal intubation, duration of ICU stay, RASS 2 or more points or delirium.
Completed
2020 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
2020 | Year | 05 | Month | 25 | Day |
2020 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
We investigated the amount of intravenous sedatives in patients who received mechanical ventilation during the period from July 2015 to January 2020, with and without sleep-promoting drugs.
Pateients were divided into three group in which the sleep-promoting drug was administered within 48 hours after admission, a group in which the drug was administered after 48, and a group in which the drug was not administered.
2021 | Year | 03 | Month | 01 | Day |
2022 | Year | 07 | Month | 22 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049601