Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000043137 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000049249 |
Scientific Title | Comparison of anesthetic area in buccal nerve block with different injection sites |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/01/31 |
Last modified on | 2023/07/31 09:32:05 |
Comparison of anesthetic area in buccal nerve block with different injection sites
Anesthetic area in buccal nerve block
Comparison of anesthetic area in buccal nerve block with different injection sites
Anesthetic area in buccal nerve block
Japan |
Mandibular tooth missing and oral maxillofacial
surgery for mandibular
Anesthesiology | Oral surgery | Dental medicine |
Others
NO
Anesthetic area in the conventional buccal nerve block injecting local anesthetic at the mucous membrane of the anterior border of the ramus in
line with the occlusive plane never cross the
hight of parotid papilla. The aim of this study is
to examine if buccal nerve block with higher
injection position could across the the hight of
parotid papilla.
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Pain response against pain stimulation at at the mucous membrane of the upper mucobuccal
fold
Anesthesia area of buccal nerve block
Pain response following the needle puncture for
infiltration anesthesia at buccal gingiva
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Single blind -investigator(s) and assessor(s) are blinded
Active
2
Treatment
Maneuver |
Conventional buccal nerve block
Buccal nerve block with higher injection position
20 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
1.Patients who are scheduled to undergo dental treatment, dental implant or oral surgery with invasion at lower buccal gingiva or cheek mucosa.
2.Patients agrees the purpose of this research
and participate voluntarily.
1.Patients with allergies or hypersensitivity
drugs to use
2.Patients who refuse to receive the buccal
nerve block
3.Patients who represent preoperative
paresthesia
4.Patients whom the lead principal investigator
judges as inappropriate
100
1st name | katsuhisa |
Middle name | |
Last name | sunada |
The Nippon Dental University School of Life
Dentistry at Tokyo
Dental Anesthesiology
102-8157
1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda Tokyo
81-3-3261-6064
katsu.sunada@nifty.com
1st name | katsuhisa |
Middle name | |
Last name | sunada |
The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo
Dental Anesthesiology
102-8157
1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda Tokyo
81-3-3261-6064
katsu.sunada@nifty.com
The Nippon Dental University
The Nippon Dental University
Self funding
IRB of NDU
1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda Tokyo
81-3-3261-8311
ndu-rinri@tky.ndu.ac.jp
NO
2021 | Year | 01 | Month | 31 | Day |
https://www.joms.org/article/S0278-2391(22)01053-9/fulltext
Published
https://www.joms.org/article/S0278-2391(22)01053-9/fulltext
38
The effective tactile sensory loss rate at 5 mm above the height of the papilla of the parotid duct of the premolar and molar regions were greater following BNTB (71 and 95%, respectively) than following conventional BNB (37%: p<.01 and 58%; p,.01, respectively).
The proportions of intraoperative pain perception of the BNTB group and the conventional BNB group were 10 and 42%(p=.06), respectively, and those of supplemental infiltration anesthesia ere 5 and 26% (p=.18), respectively.
2023 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
The clinical study was performed at the Outpatient Clinic of the Division of Oral Implantology, the Nippon Dental University Hospital from September 8, 2021 to March 20, 2022.
The study population for the clinical trial included patients, aged 18 years or older, who had been scheduled for removal of a mandibular third molar.
Exclusion criteria were a history of hypersensitivity to lidocaine, paresthesia of the buccal gingiva and buccal mucosa, bleeding diathesis, use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications, and other medical history that might have affected the clinical trial (eg, uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus, heart failure, hyperthyroidism, psychiatric disorders).
There were no adverse events.
The primary predictor variable was the approach for BNB (BNTB vs conventional BNB).
The primary outcome variable of interest was the extent of sensory loss of the buccal mucosa.
The secondary outcome variables were the anesthesia success rate of the
IANB for removal of third molars, and onset time and duration of BNBs.
The other study variables were age, sex, and injection side.
Main results already published
2020 | Year | 11 | Month | 20 | Day |
2020 | Year | 11 | Month | 30 | Day |
2021 | Year | 02 | Month | 01 | Day |
2022 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
2021 | Year | 01 | Month | 26 | Day |
2023 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049249