UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Recruitment status Enrolling by invitation
Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000043191
Receipt No. R000049119
Scientific Title Results of Endoscopic Treatment of Colorectal Polyps and Long-Term Postoperative Outcome
Date of disclosure of the study information 2021/01/31
Last modified on 2021/01/31 (Ver. 1)

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information
Public title Results of Endoscopic Treatment of Colorectal Polyps
and Long-Term Postoperative Outcome
Acronym Prospective Colorectal Polypectomy Study
Scientific Title Results of Endoscopic Treatment of Colorectal Polyps
and Long-Term Postoperative Outcome
Scientific Title:Acronym Prospective Colorectal Polypectomy Study
Region
Japan

Condition
Condition colorectal polyp
Classification by specialty
Gastroenterology
Classification by malignancy Malignancy
Genomic information NO

Objectives
Narrative objectives1 The purpose of this study is to investigate and clarify the following points in the endoscopic treatment of colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer from a forward perspective.
1) Risk factors for segmental resection in colorectal HSP/CSP/EMR/ESD
2) Postoperative recurrence rate and risk factors affecting recurrence in colorectal HSP/CSP/EMR/ESD.
To compare the en bloc resection rate of colorectal HSP/CSP/EMR/ESD according to the treatment outcome, patient background, and years of experience of the surgeon within the same treatment method and between different treatment methods. This study is expected to enable the selection of an appropriate treatment method for colorectal neoplastic lesions and the selection of an appropriate surgeon based on years of experience. By examining and clarifying the above, it will be possible to select a safer, less burdensome, and more effective treatment method for patients.
Basic objectives2 Safety,Efficacy
Basic objectives -Others
Trial characteristics_1
Trial characteristics_2
Developmental phase

Assessment
Primary outcomes Rate of endoscopic en bloc resection, rate of accidental segmental resections that may occur when en bloc resection is performed
Key secondary outcomes

Base
Study type Observational

Study design
Basic design
Randomization
Randomization unit
Blinding
Control
Stratification
Dynamic allocation
Institution consideration
Blocking
Concealment

Intervention
No. of arms
Purpose of intervention
Type of intervention
Interventions/Control_1
Interventions/Control_2
Interventions/Control_3
Interventions/Control_4
Interventions/Control_5
Interventions/Control_6
Interventions/Control_7
Interventions/Control_8
Interventions/Control_9
Interventions/Control_10

Eligibility
Age-lower limit

Not applicable
Age-upper limit

Not applicable
Gender Male and Female
Key inclusion criteria All patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for colorectal polyps at our hospital
Key exclusion criteria Patients whose consent could not be obtained
Target sample size 2000

Research contact person
Name of lead principal investigator
1st name Tomoaki
Middle name
Last name Matsumura
Organization Chiba University Hospital
Division name Gastroenterology
Zip code 2608677
Address 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba(260-8677)
TEL 0432227171
Email tsubasaishikawa19881212@gmail.com

Public contact
Name of contact person
1st name Tsubasa
Middle name
Last name Ishikawa
Organization Chiba University Hospital
Division name Gastroenterology
Zip code 2608677
Address 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba(260-8677)
TEL 0432262083
Homepage URL
Email ishikawa.tsubasa@chiba-u.jp

Sponsor
Institute Chiba University
Institute
Department

Funding Source
Organization Chiba University
Organization
Division
Category of Funding Organization Other
Nationality of Funding Organization

Other related organizations
Co-sponsor
Name of secondary funder(s)

IRB Contact (For public release)
Organization Chiba University Hospital
Address 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba(260-8677)
Tel 0432227171
Email ishikawa.tsubasa@chiba-u.jp

Secondary IDs
Secondary IDs NO
Study ID_1
Org. issuing International ID_1
Study ID_2
Org. issuing International ID_2
IND to MHLW

Institutions
Institutions

Other administrative information
Date of disclosure of the study information
2021 Year 01 Month 31 Day

Related information
URL releasing protocol
Publication of results Unpublished

Result
URL related to results and publications
Number of participants that the trial has enrolled
Results
Results date posted
Results Delayed
Results Delay Reason
Date of the first journal publication of results
Baseline Characteristics
Participant flow
Adverse events
Outcome measures
Plan to share IPD
IPD sharing Plan description

Progress
Recruitment status Enrolling by invitation
Date of protocol fixation
2020 Year 07 Month 02 Day
Date of IRB
2020 Year 07 Month 06 Day
Anticipated trial start date
2020 Year 07 Month 06 Day
Last follow-up date
2023 Year 03 Month 31 Day
Date of closure to data entry
Date trial data considered complete
Date analysis concluded

Other
Other related information Methods
The data will be picked up by medical records.
1) Patient background: gender, race, height, weight, comorbidities, medical history, current medical history, previous treatment, etc.
(2) Confirmation of subjective symptoms: Confirm by interview, etc. 2) Confirmation of subjective symptoms: Check by interview, etc. If there is a symptom diary, refer to it.
3) Blood pressure and pulse rate
(4) Blood tests: Blood chemistry tests: AST/ALT, Bil, TP/Alb, etc., to evaluate liver function and nutritional status; UN/Cre, etc., to evaluate renal function; CEA/AC19-9, etc., to evaluate tumor markers; PT/APTT, etc., to evaluate coagulation function; and blood count. 5) Urinalysis
5) Urinalysis: general urine, urine sediment, etc.
5) Urinalysis: general urine, urine sediment, etc. 6) Endoscopic findings, comparison with gross system.
7) Lesion factors (localization, gross type, tumor diameter, pathological findings [atypia, R0 resection, other], etc.)
Survival time. Presence of disease recurrence
(9) Complications/contingencies caused by treatment.
(x) Number of years of experience of the surgeon.

Summary of analysis
To examine the relationship between the accidental segmental resection rate, complication rate, patient background factors (age, gender, comorbidities, lifestyle, number of treatments, etc.), lesion factors (localization, gross type, tumor diameter, pathological findings [atypia, R0 resection, other], etc.), and surgeon factors (years, years of experience) for endoscopic treatment of colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer.
Main analysis methods
The unpaired t test or chi-square test will be used for each factor to test for significant differences. Univariate/multivariate analysis will be performed to detect factors that contribute to the risk of segmental resection. Propensity score matching will be used as needed.

Management information
Registered date
2021 Year 01 Month 31 Day
Last modified on
2021 Year 01 Month 31 Day


Link to view the page
URL(English) https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049119