Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000042927 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000049002 |
Scientific Title | The effect of telemedicine intevention on oral function in head and neck tumor patients |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/12/31 |
Last modified on | 2023/03/12 16:11:06 |
The effect of telemedicine intevention on oral function in head and neck tumor patients
ETIOFHNTP
The effect of telemedicine intevention on oral function in head and neck tumor patients
ETIOFHNTP
Asia(except Japan) |
Finished
Oral surgery | Rehabilitation medicine | Dental medicine |
Others
NO
The effect of telemedicine intevention on oral function in head and neck tumor patients
Efficacy
At the beginning of training (T0) and 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after training, patients' masticatory ability (mastication efficiency, maximum bite force and mouth opening) and swallowing ability (water swallowing test) was measured. Modified Sato questionnaire and MD Anderson dysphagia inventory (MDADI) were used for self-evaluation of chewing and swallowing ability.
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -but assessor(s) are blinded
No treatment
NO
NO
2
Educational,Counseling,Training
Behavior,custom |
Oral rehabilitation training guidance by telemedicine intevention
Self-tratining
18 | years-old | <= |
80 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
1. Patients with primary oral and maxillofacial tumor receiving surgical treatment; 2. Agree with the content of this clinical study and be able to return visit regularly after operation; 3. Be able to carry out corresponding rehabilitation training independently; 4. Patients without other central nervous system diseases or other diseases affecting oral function.
1. Recurrence of oral and maxillofacial tumor, or distant lymph node metastasis confirmed by pathology; 2. Patients with oral trauma history or temporomandibular joint disorders that may affect chewing and swallowing function; 3. Patients with serious systemic diseases, unable to cooperate with oral function detection or unable to carry out self-training; 4. Patients who were not competent to oral feeding postoperatively including patients with long-term nasogastric feeding tube.
60
1st name | Changfu |
Middle name | |
Last name | Sun |
Stomatology hospital of China Medical University
Department of oral and maxillofacial surgery
110002
No. 117, Nanjing North Street, Heping District
+86-24-31927872
changfusun@hotmail.com
1st name | Pai |
Middle name | |
Last name | Pang |
Stomatology hospital of China Medical University
Department of oral and maxillofacial surgery
110002
No. 117, Nanjing North Street, Heping District
+86-24-31927739
pangpai@163.com
Stomatology hospital of China Medical University
None
Non profit foundation
None
Stomatology hospital of China Medical University
No. 117, Nanjing North Street, Heping District
+86-24-13700022978
413959283@qq.com
NO
2021 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
None
Unpublished
None
64
A total of 64 participants were included. The masticatory efficiency scores of the TMI group were significantly better than those of the control group at T2 and T3, and maximum mouth opening was better at T2 and T3. In water swallowing test, the TMI group had better scores at T2 and T3. The scores of MDADI scale in TMI group were better than those in the control group after 3 months of training.
2021 | Year | 01 | Month | 06 | Day |
Among the patients who received masticatory rehabilitation training, 5 patients with benign tumors were included, including 3 cases of ameloblastoma (2 cases in TMI group and 1 case in control group), 1 case of oral lichen planus (TMI group) and 1 case of myofibroblastoma (control group). Among the malignant tumor patients included, 1 verrucous carcinoma was included in TMI group, and the other patients were diagnosed as SCC. The patients receiving swallowing rehabilitation training were all malignant, including 1 case of pleomorphic adenocarcinoma (TMI group), 1 case of myoepithelial carcinoma (control group) and 1 case of adenoid cystic carcinoma (TMI group), and the rest patients were SCC. No patients underwent secondary operation during peri-operative stage and the period of postoperative rehabilitation training.
Nine patients were lost to follow-up, 1 patient dropped out of the project, and 1 patient passed away before the end of the study. Finally, 26 patients received masticatory function rehabilitation training and evaluation (TMI group 13 cases, control group 13 cases), 38 patients received swallowing function rehabilitation training and evaluation (TMI group 20 cases, control group 18 cases).
None
Patients' masticatory ability (mastication efficiency, maximum bite force and mouth opening) and swallowing ability (water swallowing test) was measured. Modified Sato questionnaire and MD Anderson dysphagia inventory (MDADI) were used for self-evaluation of chewing and swallowing ability.
No longer recruiting
2018 | Year | 05 | Month | 01 | Day |
2018 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
2019 | Year | 02 | Month | 01 | Day |
2020 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
2021 | Year | 01 | Month | 06 | Day |
2023 | Year | 03 | Month | 12 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049002