Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000042788 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000048838 |
Scientific Title | Clinical outcomes of medical treatments for progressive desmoid tumors following active surveillance: A systematic review |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2020/12/18 |
Last modified on | 2022/03/07 15:04:49 |
Clinical outcomes of medical treatments for progressive desmoid tumors following active surveillance: A systematic review
Clinical outcomes of medical treatments for progressive desmoid tumors following active surveillance: A systematic review
Clinical outcomes of medical treatments for progressive desmoid tumors following active surveillance: A systematic review
Clinical outcomes of medical treatments for progressive desmoid tumors following active surveillance: A systematic review
Japan |
desmoid tumor
Hematology and clinical oncology |
Others
NO
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of each TKI or low-dose or conventional chemotherapeutic agents by reviewing only the studies that required progressive disease as the inclusion criterion.
Safety,Efficacy
Progression-free survival, reduction of tumor size by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1), disease control rate, and adverse events evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 5.0).
Others,meta-analysis etc
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
We included all reports examining effectiveness and toxicity of TKIs such as imatinib, sorafenib, anlotinib, pazopanib or nilotinib or low-dose or conventional chemotherapeutic agents such as methotrexate (MTX) plus vinblastine (VBL) or vinorelbine (VNL), anthracycline based regimens, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for progressive DT. We included studies involving human subjects and articles that used clearly defined disease control rates or progression-free survival as an outcome. Only the articles published from January 1, 1995 in English were included.
We excluded studies with unclear indication of outcomes, review articles, isolated case reports or case series including fewer than five patients, non-English abstracts, and conference abstracts. We excluded studies that did not specify progressive disease as the inclusion criterion or those that reported effectiveness and toxicity of antihormonal therapies or NSAIDs.
1st name | Shinji |
Middle name | |
Last name | Tsukamoto |
Nara Medical University
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
634-8521
840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-city, Nara 634-8521, Japan
0744223051
shinji104@mail.goo.ne.jp
1st name | Shinji |
Middle name | Tsukamoto |
Last name | Tsukamoto |
Nara Medical University
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
634-8521
840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-city, Nara 634-8521, Japan
0744223051
sh104@naramed-u.ac.jp
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University
Other
Nara Medical University
840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-city, Nara 634-8521, Japan
0744223051
ino_rinri@naramed-u.ac.jp
NO
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 18 | Day |
DOI: 10.1007/s12306-022-00738-x
Published
24
Completed
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 18 | Day |
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 18 | Day |
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 18 | Day |
2022 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
We search EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).The studies were classified into five modalities including low-dose chemotherapy, imatinib, TKIs except for imatinib, doxorubicin (DOX)-based, and liposomal DOX, and the other chemotherapeutic agents. We used a data collection sheet to collect the following data: (1) authors, year of publication, type of study, number of patients, intervention, interval of intervention, inclusion criteria, ratio of intraabdominal DT, ratio of primary DT, and length of follow-up; (2) progression-free survival, reduction of tumor size by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1), disease control rate, and adverse events evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 5.0). We independently graded the nonrandomized studies selected for the final analysis according to the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Nonrandomized Studies (RoBANS tool) and randomized studies according to risk of bias (RoB1 tool) in order to assess the quality of studies in meta-analyses.
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 18 | Day |
2022 | Year | 03 | Month | 07 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000048838