| Recruitment status | Main results already published |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000041664 |
| Receipt No. | R000047560 |
| Scientific Title | Immunohistochemical markers to differentiate primary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2020/09/03 |
| Last modified on | 2022/11/18 (Ver. 2) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Immunohistochemical markers to differentiate primary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis | |
| Acronym | Immunohistochemical markers to differentiate primary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis | |
| Scientific Title | Immunohistochemical markers to differentiate primary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Immunohistochemical markers to differentiate primary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | NSCLC | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | Sensitivity and specificity are key metrics to understand the diagnostic test accuracy of immunohistochemical stain technique. Without knowing the sensitivity and specificity of each marker, pathologist cannot select appropriate immunohistochemical markers. In addition, these data are required to judge the pathological subtype of NSCLC when multiple markers indicate discrepant results. Numerous studies were conducted to reveal the diagnostic test accuracy of immunohistochemical markers. However, these articles reported highly diverse results. To our knowledge, a meta-analysis assessing diagnostic value of TTF--1 for metastases of pulmonary adenocarcinoma and a meta-analysis elucidating combined TTF-1 and Napsin A were published. However, no systematic review evaluated diagnostic test accuracy of each marker to distinguish adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of lungs. Aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize data from the previous studies regarding diagnostic test accuracy of immunohistochemical markers that are used for distinguishing primary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell lung cancer of the lungs.
|
| Basic objectives2 | Others |
| Basic objectives -Others | Aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize data from the previous studies regarding diagnostic test accuracy of immunohistochemical markers that are used for distinguishing primary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell lung cancer of the lungs. |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Sensitivity, specificity, area under curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio will be evaluated. If two or more of cutoffs are applied in an original article, all of weak, moderate, and strong positive will be collectively considered positive. To diagnose adenocarcinoma, both adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma will be counted since adenosquamous carcinoma has adenocarcinoma component while large cell carcinoma and NSCLC not otherwise specified will not be counted as adenocarcinoma. Similar algorithm will be applied to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma.
If data for multiple clones, e.g. 8G7G3/1, SPT24, and SP141 clones of TTF-1, are available, the data of 8G7G3/1 will be selected for our analysis because 8G7G3/1 clone has been known to provide the best diagnostic odds ratio among the three clones. Subgroup analysis focusing on each clone will be also done. |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| Base | |
| Study type | Others,meta-analysis etc |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | We will include full article, brief report, and conference abstract published in any language that provide data for sensitivity and specificity by immunohistochemical markers to diagnose adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Case-control study design consisted of patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma will be accepted though case-control design may be counted as risk of bias according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2(QUADAS-2).
Target population will be patients with NSCLC. Commonly used pathological criteria will be accepted along with WHO 2015 criteria. Patients with both surgical and biopsy specimens will be allowed. Specimen outside the lung such as lymph nodes and pleural effusion will be accepted. Immunocytochemical stein using pleural effusion cell block will be also accepted along with immunohistochemical stein. Target immunohistochemical markers include P40, CK5/6, P63, and desmocollin-3 (DSC3) for squamous cell carcinoma and TTF-1, Napsin A, and cytokeratin 7 (CK7) for adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical technique using any commercially available antibodies and non-commercial antibodies will be accepted. Reference test should be pathological diagnosis by pathologists. |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | An article that provide data of either sensitivity or specificity will be excluded since bivariate analysis is not applicable to such data.
Specificity evaluated among lung cancer cases will not be used for our analysis because analysis including both NSCLC and small-cell lung cancer will underestimate the specificity of markers. Studies focusing on non-pulmonary cancers and metastatic lung cancer of non-pulmonary origin will be excluded. Similarly, studies that compared NSCLC subtypes and mesothelioma will not be accepted. |
|||
| Target sample size | ||||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Yokohama City University Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Chemotherapy Center | ||||||
| Zip code | 236-0004 | ||||||
| Address | 3-9, Fikuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 045-787-2800 | ||||||
| horitano@yokohama-cu.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Yokohama City University Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Chemotherapy Center | ||||||
| Zip code | 236-0004 | ||||||
| Address | 3-9, Fikuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 0457872800 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| horitano@yokohama-cu.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Yokohama City University Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Yokohama City University Hospital |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | IRB not approved |
| Address | 3-9, Fikuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama |
| Tel | 0457872800 |
| horitano@yokohama-cu.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| Result | |
| URL related to results and publications | |
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | |
| Results | |
| Results date posted | |
| Results Delayed | |
| Results Delay Reason | |
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |
| Baseline Characteristics | |
| Participant flow | |
| Adverse events | |
| Outcome measures | |
| Plan to share IPD | |
| IPD sharing Plan description | |
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Main results already published | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | Study overview
The protocol of this systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy was composited following standard guidelines for systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy and PRISMA-DTA. Approval of Institutional Review Board was not required because of the nature of this study. Study search Four major electric databases, namely PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase will be searched on September 3, 2020. The following formula will be applied for PubMed: ((P40 OR deltaNp63 OR delta-NP63) OR (P63 OR DBR16.1) OR (ck5/6 OR Cytokeratin 5/6) OR (desmocollin 3 OR desmocollin-3 OR DSC3 OR DSC-3) OR (TTF1 OR TTF-1 OR Thyroid transcription factor-1 OR Thyroid transcription factor 1) OR (NapsinA OR Napsin A OR TA02 OR aspartic protease) OR (CK7 OR cytokeratin7 OR cytokeratin 7)) AND ((sensitivity AND specificity) OR (diagnostic test accuracy) OR (likelihood ratio) OR (sensitivity AND adenocarcinoma AND squamous)) AND (NSCLC OR lung OR pulmonary OR bronchial OR pleural OR respiratory OR bronchoscopy) AND (NSCLC OR adenocarcinoma OR squamous OR squamous-cell OR non-small OR non small). Risk of bias QUADAS2 was applied to assess the risk of bias in each study. Statistics Bivariate model will be used to obtain pooled sensitivity and specificity and to draw a summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC). We will obtain DOR by DerSimonian-Laird random-model. Publication bias for DOR will be checked by visual inspection and by Begg-Kendall test after a funnel plot will be drawn uding RevMan ver. 5 (Cochrane, London, UK). DOR will be calculated by "madauni" command ("netmeta" package of R project, Gerta Rucker, Denmark). Sensitivity and specificity will be pooled by "reitsma" command ("netmeta" package of R project, Gerta Rucker, Denmark). The statistical threshold for significance will set at 0.05. |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000047560 |