Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000041244 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000046811 |
Scientific Title | A randomized controlled trial comparing conventional ESD versus hybrid ESD for gastric neoplasms |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2020/07/29 |
Last modified on | 2024/04/03 08:22:13 |
A randomized controlled trial comparing conventional ESD versus hybrid ESD for gastric neoplasms
Hybrid-G study
A randomized controlled trial comparing conventional ESD versus hybrid ESD for gastric neoplasms
A randomized controlled trial comparing conventional ESD versus hybrid ESD for gastric neoplasms
Japan |
Gastric neoplasm
Gastroenterology |
Malignancy
NO
This study investigates the usefulness of snaring during dissection in ESD for gastric neoplasms.
Efficacy
Procedure time of ESD
Time and speed of mucosal incision
Time and speed of submucosal dissection with or without snaring
En bloc and complete resection
Curability judged by histological assessment of resected specimen
Endoscopic procedural adverse events including intraoperative perforation, delayed perforation and delayed bleeding
Degree of dissected submucosal layer before snaring
Volume of injective solution
Number and time of hemostasis using hemostatic device during procedure
Thickness of submucosal layer in resected specimen
The relationship between outcomes and morphology / location / size/ ulceration / operator's experience.
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
YES
YES
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Central registration
2
Treatment
Maneuver |
When assigned to the standard treatment group (group A), conventional ESD is performed.
When assigned to the study treatment group (group B), hybrid ESD is performed.
20 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
-Male or female aged 20 years with early gastric neoplasm who will undergo endoscopic resection as a local treatment
-Eligible lesion is diagnosed as a gastric adenoma or adenocarcinoma by endoscopic biopsy within 90 days before enrollment.
-Eligible lesion is endoscopically diagnosed as a mucosal lesion within 20 mm in diameter without ulceration.
-Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) of each eligible patient is 0, 1, or 2.
-Eligible patients will be asked to listen to oral explanation and read explanatory documents providing doctors' instruction and sign consent forms. Informed consent will be obtained from each eligible patient before enrollment in the trial
-Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
-Patients with a history of gastric surgery
-Patients on dialysis
-Patients requiring continuous administration of heparin during perioperative period.
-Contraindication with endoscopy; ileus, gastrointestinal perforation or severe respiratory/cardiac disease.
-Metal allergy
-Patients who are judged inappropriate by physician participating in this trial
-Patients who cannot obtain informed consent
82
1st name | Haruei |
Middle name | |
Last name | Ogino |
Graduate School of Medicine, Kyushu University
Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science
812-8582
3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka
092-642-5286
ogino@intmed3.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
1st name | Mitsuru |
Middle name | |
Last name | Esaki |
Graduate School of Medicine, Kyushu University
Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science
812-8582
3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka
092-642-5286
esaki_saiseikai@yahoo.co.jp
Graduate School of Medicine, Kyushu University
Graduate School of Medicine, Kyushu University
Self funding
Kyushu University Institutional Review Board for Clinical Trials
3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka
092-642-5082
byskenkyu@jimu.kyushu-u.ac.jp
NO
九州大学病院(福岡県)、九州医療センター(福岡県)、福岡東医療センター(福岡県)、原三信病院(福岡県)、福岡市民病院(福岡県)、済生会二日市病院(福岡県)、福岡中央病院(福岡県)、済生会八幡病院(福岡県)、別府医療センター(大分県)
2020 | Year | 07 | Month | 29 | Day |
https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-022-06099-x
Published
https://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542-3565(22)01019-9/fulltext
82
The procedure time of H-ESD was significantly shorter than that of C-ESD (33.16 min vs 62.46 min; H-ESD/C-ESD ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.69; P < .0001).
2024 | Year | 04 | Month | 03 | Day |
Thare was no significant difference between two groups.
A total of 39 and 40 patients underwent H-ESD and C-ESD, respectively.
No difference was observed between the 2 groups.
The procedure time of H-ESD was significantly shorter than that of C-ESD (33.16 min vs 62.46 min; H-ESD/C-ESD ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.69; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in mucosal incision time between the 2 groups; the time and speed of submucosal dissection of H-ESD were significantly shorter than those of C-ESD. No difference was observed between the 2 groups in other outcomes.
Completed
2020 | Year | 07 | Month | 28 | Day |
2020 | Year | 07 | Month | 28 | Day |
2020 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
2022 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
2021 | Year | 08 | Month | 27 | Day |
2020 | Year | 07 | Month | 29 | Day |
2024 | Year | 04 | Month | 03 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000046811