| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000040466 |
| Receipt No. | R000046188 |
| Scientific Title | Does the Problem Based Learning style teleconference improve medical students psychological safety and self-explanation in clinical reasoning conference? A randomized controlled trial |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2020/05/20 |
| Last modified on | 2020/11/21 (Ver. 4) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Does the Problem Based Learning style teleconference improve medical students psychological safety and self-explanation in clinical reasoning conference? A randomized controlled trial | |
| Acronym | PBL style teleconference in the perspective of students psychological safety | |
| Scientific Title | Does the Problem Based Learning style teleconference improve medical students psychological safety and self-explanation in clinical reasoning conference? A randomized controlled trial | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | PBL style teleconference in the perspective of students psychological safety | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | Medical students | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | Improvement of medical education. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Explanatory |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Psychological safety
Self-explanation |
| Key secondary outcomes | Autonomy
Satisfaction Preference of the conference |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Cross-over |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Cluster |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Placebo |
| Stratification | NO |
| Dynamic allocation | NO |
| Institution consideration | Institution is not considered as adjustment factor. |
| Blocking | NO |
| Concealment | Central registration |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Educational,Counseling,Training | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | Use of teleconference style | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | Traditional face-to-face conference | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | The study participants consisted of medical students participating in a general medicine clinical clerkship rotation from September 2019 to February 2020, and those who were able to participate to both traditional style and intervention style conferences. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | Students who were not able to participate to either control style or intervention style conference. | |||
| Target sample size | 30 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Chiba University Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | General Medicine | ||||||
| Zip code | 2608677 | ||||||
| Address | 1-8-1, Inohana, Chu-ou-ku, Chiba-city | ||||||
| TEL | 043-222-7171 | ||||||
| ikusaka@ga2.so-net.ne.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Chiba University Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | General Medicine | ||||||
| Zip code | 2608677 | ||||||
| Address | Chiba | ||||||
| TEL | 0432227171 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| kshikino@gmail.com | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Chiba University Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | None |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Ethics Committee of Chiba University School of Medicine |
| Address | 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-city, Chiba pref. Japan |
| Tel | 043-226-2501 |
| igaku-rinri@office.chiba-u.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 千葉大学医学部附属病院 |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Partially published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | |||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 34 | ||||||
| Results | Psychological safety score and autonomy, Number of students who did self-explanation were higher in PBL style teleconference. Moreover, PBL style teleconference was preferred by 18 (44%), traditional live style conference by 8 (24%) and neutral by 11 (32%) participants. There was no significant difference in satisfaction between conferences with a high score in both types. |
||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed |
|
||||||
| Results Delay Reason | Outbreak of COVID-19 | ||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results |
|
||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | Psychological safety score and autonomy, Number of students who did self-explanation were higher in PBL style teleconference. Moreover, PBL style teleconference was preferred by 18 (44%), traditional live style conference by 8 (24%) and neutral by 11 (32%) participants. There was no significant difference in satisfaction between conferences with a high score in both types. |
||||||
| Participant flow | Teleconferences were held in a separate room with a screen showing the live conference with one doctor to help students understand the discussion when it exceeded their level of medical expertise. Students were allowed to share their ideas during the discussion. For the control style, students who participated in the live conference were also allowed to share their opinions about the case. After each type of conference, questionnaires assessed the participants psychological safety using Edmondsons psychological safety scale along with autonomy, satisfaction, and preference of the conference. We also counted the number of students SE during each conference. |
||||||
| Adverse events | N/A |
||||||
| Outcome measures | Psychological safety,Self-explanation, Autonomy, Satisfaction, Preference of the conference |
||||||
| Plan to share IPD | No | ||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | No | ||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000046188 |