Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000040139 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000045769 |
Scientific Title | Influence of differences in vasodilatory capacity in shunt stenosis on treatment results and inspection standards |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2020/04/15 |
Last modified on | 2020/04/13 09:59:28 |
Influence of differences in vasodilatory capacity in shunt stenosis on treatment results and inspection standards
Vasodilator capacity of shunt stenosis
Influence of differences in vasodilatory capacity in shunt stenosis on treatment results and inspection standards
Vasodilator capacity of shunt stenosis
Japan |
Chronic kidney disease
Vascular surgery | Urology |
Others
NO
We examined whether differences in the vasodilatory capacity of shunt stenoses affect FV, RI values, and VA prognosis.
Others
non
Confirmatory
Ninety-six patients on maintenance dialysis who underwent VAIVT under echo with a stenotic cross-sectional area of less than 3.14 mm2 (2.0*2.0 mm in the case of a normal circle) were included in the study. First, subjects were classified into two groups based on the degree of vasodilatation by hemorrhage: poorly vascularized and well vascularized groups. There have been no previous reports on the degree of vasodilatation capacity in shunt stenosis as good or bad.
Statistical analysis
The study items were patient background (gender, VA type, VA construction site, age, dialysis history, VA history, and history of diabetes mellitus (DM)), non-hypertensive stenosis cross-sectional area before VAIVT, stenosis cross-sectional area during hemostasis, FV and RI before VAIVT, FV and RI after VAIVT, maximum diastolic pressure during VAIVT, stenosis dilatation rate before and after VAIVT, non-hypertensive stenosis cross-sectional area after VAIVT, number of VAIVTs in the past 3 years, and presence or absence of VA events during HD. The data from each of the two groups were compared statistically. The occurrence of a VA event was counted as a single case of poor bleeding, elevated venous pressure, or recirculation.
Interventional
Parallel
Non-randomized
Open -but assessor(s) are blinded
Active
2
Treatment
Device,equipment |
VAIVT
Flow volume, Resistance Index for Ultra sound
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
Ninety-six patients on maintenance dialysis who underwent VAIVT under echo with a stenotic cross-sectional area of less than 3.14 mm2 (2.0*2.0 mm in the case of a normal circle) were included in the study.
Unsuccessful VAIVT treatment
100
1st name | Yasumasa |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hitomi |
Tojinkai Hospital
Department of Clinical Engineering
612-8026
83-1 iga momoyama tyo fushimi ku kyoto, Japan
0756221991
hitomi.y@tojinkai.jp
1st name | Yasumasa |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hitomi |
Tojinkai Hospital
Department of Clinical Engineering
612-8026
83-1 iga momoyama tyo fushimi ku kyoto, Japan
0756221991
hitomi.y@tojinkai.jp
Tojinkai Hospital
non
Other
Department of Clinical Engineering, Tojinkai Hospital
83-1 iga momoyama tyo fushimi ku kyoto, Japan
0756221991
hitomi.y@tojinkai.jp
NO
桃仁会病院(京都)
2020 | Year | 04 | Month | 15 | Day |
Unpublished
96
Completed
2018 | Year | 11 | Month | 01 | Day |
2018 | Year | 12 | Month | 01 | Day |
2018 | Year | 12 | Month | 01 | Day |
2019 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
2020 | Year | 04 | Month | 13 | Day |
2020 | Year | 04 | Month | 13 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000045769