UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000039661 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000045091 |
| Scientific Title | Psychometric properties (construct and criterion validity) of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire: a systematic review |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2020/03/02 |
| Last modified on | 2024/03/07 19:01:16 |
* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments
Basic information
Public title
Psychometric properties (construct and criterion validity) of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire: a systematic review
Acronym
Psychometric properties of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire: a systematic review
Scientific Title
Psychometric properties (construct and criterion validity) of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire: a systematic review
Scientific Title:Acronym
Psychometric properties of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire: a systematic review
Region
| Japan |
Condition
Condition
Not applicable
Classification by specialty
| Not applicable |
Classification by malignancy
Others
Genomic information
NO
Objectives
Narrative objectives1
The aim of this systematic review is to investigate psychometric properties (construct and criterion validity) of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ) by systematic review as follows;
1) to investigate the cross-sectional association between the BJSQ subscales and other evaluation/rating scales.
2) to investigate the longitudinal association between psychosocial factors at work assessed by the BJSQ subscales and any health outcomes assessed by other evaluation/rating scales, measurements, or diagnostic criteria.
3) to investigate the longitudinal association between psychosocial factors at work assessed by other evaluation/rating scales and health outcomes assessed by the BJSQ subscales.
Basic objectives2
Others
Basic objectives -Others
This systematic review is conducted to describe the association between the BJSQ subscales and other evaluation/rating scales.
Trial characteristics_1
Trial characteristics_2
Developmental phase
Assessment
Primary outcomes
Health outcomes assessed by other evaluation/rating scales, measurements, or diagnostic criteria, or psychosocial factors at work assessed by other evaluation/rating scales
Key secondary outcomes
Base
Study type
Others,meta-analysis etc
Study design
Basic design
Randomization
Randomization unit
Blinding
Control
Stratification
Dynamic allocation
Institution consideration
Blocking
Concealment
Intervention
No. of arms
Purpose of intervention
Type of intervention
Interventions/Control_1
Interventions/Control_2
Interventions/Control_3
Interventions/Control_4
Interventions/Control_5
Interventions/Control_6
Interventions/Control_7
Interventions/Control_8
Interventions/Control_9
Interventions/Control_10
Eligibility
Age-lower limit
| 18 | years-old | <= |
Age-upper limit
| Not applicable |
Gender
Male and Female
Key inclusion criteria
Worker
Key exclusion criteria
Not applicable
Target sample size
Research contact person
Name of lead principal investigator
| 1st name | Norito |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Kawakami |
Organization
Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
Division name
Department of Digital Mental Health
Zip code
113-0033
Address
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
TEL
+81-3-5800-9621
norito@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Public contact
Name of contact person
| 1st name | Norito |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Kawakami |
Organization
Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
Division name
Department of Digital Mental Health
Zip code
113-0033
Address
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
TEL
+81-3-5800-9621
Homepage URL
norito@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Sponsor or person
Institute
Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
Institute
Department
Personal name
Funding Source
Organization
This study was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) and
KAKENHI.
Organization
Division
Category of Funding Organization
Japanese Governmental office
Nationality of Funding Organization
JPN
Other related organizations
Co-sponsor
Name of secondary funder(s)
IRB Contact (For public release)
Organization
Department of Digital Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
Address
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Tel
+81-3-5800-9621
norito@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Secondary IDs
Secondary IDs
NO
Study ID_1
Org. issuing International ID_1
Study ID_2
Org. issuing International ID_2
IND to MHLW
Institutions
Institutions
Other administrative information
Date of disclosure of the study information
| 2020 | Year | 03 | Month | 02 | Day |
Related information
URL releasing protocol
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000045091
Publication of results
Published
Result
URL related to results and publications
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1814
Number of participants that the trial has enrolled
145
Results
In total, 145 published reports between 2003 and 2021 were included. Among the BJSQ subscales, job stressors (n = 95) such as quantitative job overload (n = 65) and job control (n = 64) were most often used. The subscales were utilized to investigate the relationships with several other measurements. Five reports used subscales from the New BJSQ.
Results date posted
| 2024 | Year | 03 | Month | 07 | Day |
Results Delayed
Results Delay Reason
Date of the first journal publication of results
Baseline Characteristics
Most studies were conducted cross-sectionally (n = 116), while the remaining were longitudinal studies (n = 29). The sample size ranged from 18 to 69,805. In the included studies,
recruitment of the participants was conducted from private companies (n = 59), hospitals (n = 42), nursing or welfare facilities (n = 13), healthcare centers (n = 7), web surveys (n = 5),
public sectors (n = 5), existing cohorts (n = 4), fire defense stations/headquarters (n = 4), and a convenience sample of faculty staff members or alumni of universities (n = 6).
Participant flow
Identified records were managed in a Microsoft Excel (Washington, DC, USA) file. One investigator sorted the records by title and removed duplicates. Subsequently, each record was assigned to two reviewers from among 13 investigators. The investigators independently judged whether a record met the inclusion criteria of the systematic review. Records judged as not eligible by both of the two contributors were excluded, and other records were sought for retrieval of full texts. The full texts were judged by two independent reviewers, different from the initial screening, from 18 investigators. Reports assessed as eligible by both reviewers were included for review. When two investigators had inconsistent judgment at this full-text review stage, an agreement was reached through discussions with the project directors. When a report was excluded at this stage, the primary reasons for exclusion were recorded.
Adverse events
N/A
Outcome measures
Study Characteristics
Plan to share IPD
IPD sharing Plan description
Progress
Recruitment status
Completed
Date of protocol fixation
| 2019 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
Date of IRB
| 2019 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
Anticipated trial start date
| 2019 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
Last follow-up date
| 2022 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
Date of closure to data entry
Date trial data considered complete
Date analysis concluded
Other
Other related information
Psychometric properties (construct and criterion validity) of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire: a systematic review
This study do not apply for ethical review because it is a systematic review.
Management information
Registered date
| 2020 | Year | 03 | Month | 02 | Day |
Last modified on
| 2024 | Year | 03 | Month | 07 | Day |
Link to view the page
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000045091
