UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Recruitment status Completed
Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000037180
Receipt No. R000042370
Scientific Title Comparison between ABCD and IMS scores in prediction of long-term T2DM remission after metabolic surgery in East Asian obese patients
Date of disclosure of the study information 2019/07/01
Last modified on 2022/06/29 (Ver. 3)

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information
Public title Comparison between ABCD and IMS scores in prediction of long-term T2DM remission after metabolic surgery in East Asian obese patients
Acronym Comparison between scoring systems in prediction of T2DM remission after metabolic surgery in East Asian obese patients
Scientific Title Comparison between ABCD and IMS scores in prediction of long-term T2DM remission after metabolic surgery in East Asian obese patients
Scientific Title:Acronym Comparison between scoring systems in prediction of T2DM remission after metabolic surgery in East Asian obese patients
Region
Japan Asia(except Japan)

Condition
Condition Obesity with type 2 diabetes
Classification by specialty
Gastrointestinal surgery
Classification by malignancy Others
Genomic information NO

Objectives
Narrative objectives1 To compare ABCD score with Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS) score in terms of prediction of T2DM remission in East Asian obese patients 3 and 5 years after metabolic surgery, to evaluate who were good candidates for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and to adjust IMS points to East Asian patients
Basic objectives2 Efficacy
Basic objectives -Others
Trial characteristics_1 Confirmatory
Trial characteristics_2 Pragmatic
Developmental phase Not applicable

Assessment
Primary outcomes Which scoring system is better in prediction of T2DM remission in East Asian obese patients 3 and 5 years after metabolic surgery?
Key secondary outcomes Who were good candidates for sleeve gastrectomy in East Asian countries?
What is the better borderline point between mild and moderate stages in IMS score in East Asian countries?

Base
Study type Observational

Study design
Basic design
Randomization
Randomization unit
Blinding
Control
Stratification
Dynamic allocation
Institution consideration
Blocking
Concealment

Intervention
No. of arms
Purpose of intervention
Type of intervention
Interventions/Control_1
Interventions/Control_2
Interventions/Control_3
Interventions/Control_4
Interventions/Control_5
Interventions/Control_6
Interventions/Control_7
Interventions/Control_8
Interventions/Control_9
Interventions/Control_10

Eligibility
Age-lower limit
18 years-old <=
Age-upper limit
65 years-old >
Gender Male and Female
Key inclusion criteria Obese diabetic patients 3 years or more after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), resectional RYGB, mini-gastric bypass (one anastomosis gastric bypass), and SG with duodenojejunal bypass (SG-DJB) as the primary operation
Key exclusion criteria Patients who are not diagnosed as T2DM before operation
Patients who have no data of preoperative C-peptide
Patients who experienced severe complications such as leakage just after the first operation
Patients who received revision surgery within 3 years after the first operation
Patients who received pregnancy within 3 years after the first operation
Patients who have lack of 3 years data (between 3-4 years)
Patients who received other operations than SG, RYGB, resectional RYGB, mini-gastric bypass, and SG-DJB
Patients who received open metabolic surgery (not laparoscopic)
When patients experienced revision surgery or pregnancy between 4-5 years, 5 years data are only excluded.
Target sample size 27

Research contact person
Name of lead principal investigator
1st name Masayuki
Middle name
Last name Ohta
Organization Oita University
Division name Global Oita Medical Advanced Research Center for Health
Zip code 8795593
Address 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu,, Oita
TEL 81975865843
Email ohta@oita-u.ac.jp

Public contact
Name of contact person
1st name Masayuki
Middle name
Last name Ohta
Organization Oita University
Division name Global Oita Medical Advanced Research Center for Health
Zip code 8795593
Address 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu,, Oita
TEL 81975865843
Homepage URL http://www.surgery1.med.oita-u.ac.jp/patient/guide06/
Email ohta@oita-u.ac.jp

Sponsor
Institute Oita University
Institute
Department

Funding Source
Organization Oita University
Organization
Division
Category of Funding Organization Other
Nationality of Funding Organization

Other related organizations
Co-sponsor
Name of secondary funder(s)

IRB Contact (For public release)
Organization General Affairs Division, Oita University Faculty of Medicine
Address 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu,, Oita
Tel +81-97^586-5012
Email rinrikenkyu@oita-u.ac.jp

Secondary IDs
Secondary IDs NO
Study ID_1
Org. issuing International ID_1
Study ID_2
Org. issuing International ID_2
IND to MHLW

Institutions
Institutions

Other administrative information
Date of disclosure of the study information
2019 Year 07 Month 01 Day

Related information
URL releasing protocol http://www.surgery1.med.oita-u.ac.jp/patient/guide06/
Publication of results Published

Result
URL related to results and publications https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11695-020-05151-6.pdf
Number of participants that the trial has enrolled 24
Results he two scoring systems were significantly well correlated. The IMS scoring system showed significant differences in T2DM remission rates between the procedures in the moderate stage, but the ABCD score showed no significant differences in each category. The discrimination power of the IMS score was comparable to that of the ABCD score at both 3 and 5 years. The revised IMS scoring system showed that SG-DJB had significantly higher T2DM remission rates in the moderate stage at 5 years than RYGB or SG.
Results date posted
2022 Year 06 Month 29 Day
Results Delayed
Results Delay Reason
Date of the first journal publication of results
Baseline Characteristics 24 bariatric/metabolic surgeons from Japan, Korea and China
Participant flow The number was planned to be 29, but it was reduced to 24.
Adverse events No adverse events
Outcome measures Comparison of 2 scoring systems and correction of thresholds for mild and moderate stages of IMS scores
Plan to share IPD
IPD sharing Plan description

Progress
Recruitment status Completed
Date of protocol fixation
2018 Year 12 Month 15 Day
Date of IRB
2019 Year 01 Month 17 Day
Anticipated trial start date
2019 Year 06 Month 01 Day
Last follow-up date
2020 Year 06 Month 30 Day
Date of closure to data entry
2020 Year 08 Month 31 Day
Date trial data considered complete
2020 Year 12 Month 31 Day
Date analysis concluded
2021 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Other
Other related information Metabolic surgery

Management information
Registered date
2019 Year 06 Month 26 Day
Last modified on
2022 Year 06 Month 29 Day


Link to view the page
URL(English) https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000042370