| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000037180 |
| Receipt No. | R000042370 |
| Scientific Title | Comparison between ABCD and IMS scores in prediction of long-term T2DM remission after metabolic surgery in East Asian obese patients |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2019/07/01 |
| Last modified on | 2022/06/29 (Ver. 3) |
| Basic information | |||
| Public title | Comparison between ABCD and IMS scores in prediction of long-term T2DM remission after metabolic surgery in East Asian obese patients | ||
| Acronym | Comparison between scoring systems in prediction of T2DM remission after metabolic surgery in East Asian obese patients | ||
| Scientific Title | Comparison between ABCD and IMS scores in prediction of long-term T2DM remission after metabolic surgery in East Asian obese patients | ||
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Comparison between scoring systems in prediction of T2DM remission after metabolic surgery in East Asian obese patients | ||
| Region |
|
||
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Obesity with type 2 diabetes | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To compare ABCD score with Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS) score in terms of prediction of T2DM remission in East Asian obese patients 3 and 5 years after metabolic surgery, to evaluate who were good candidates for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and to adjust IMS points to East Asian patients |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Pragmatic |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Which scoring system is better in prediction of T2DM remission in East Asian obese patients 3 and 5 years after metabolic surgery? |
| Key secondary outcomes | Who were good candidates for sleeve gastrectomy in East Asian countries?
What is the better borderline point between mild and moderate stages in IMS score in East Asian countries? |
| Base | |
| Study type | Observational |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Obese diabetic patients 3 years or more after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), resectional RYGB, mini-gastric bypass (one anastomosis gastric bypass), and SG with duodenojejunal bypass (SG-DJB) as the primary operation | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | Patients who are not diagnosed as T2DM before operation
Patients who have no data of preoperative C-peptide Patients who experienced severe complications such as leakage just after the first operation Patients who received revision surgery within 3 years after the first operation Patients who received pregnancy within 3 years after the first operation Patients who have lack of 3 years data (between 3-4 years) Patients who received other operations than SG, RYGB, resectional RYGB, mini-gastric bypass, and SG-DJB Patients who received open metabolic surgery (not laparoscopic) When patients experienced revision surgery or pregnancy between 4-5 years, 5 years data are only excluded. |
|||
| Target sample size | 27 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Oita University | ||||||
| Division name | Global Oita Medical Advanced Research Center for Health | ||||||
| Zip code | 8795593 | ||||||
| Address | 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu,, Oita | ||||||
| TEL | 81975865843 | ||||||
| ohta@oita-u.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Oita University | ||||||
| Division name | Global Oita Medical Advanced Research Center for Health | ||||||
| Zip code | 8795593 | ||||||
| Address | 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu,, Oita | ||||||
| TEL | 81975865843 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | http://www.surgery1.med.oita-u.ac.jp/patient/guide06/ | ||||||
| ohta@oita-u.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Oita University |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Oita University |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | General Affairs Division, Oita University Faculty of Medicine |
| Address | 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu,, Oita |
| Tel | +81-97^586-5012 |
| rinrikenkyu@oita-u.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | http://www.surgery1.med.oita-u.ac.jp/patient/guide06/ |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11695-020-05151-6.pdf | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 24 | ||||||
| Results | he two scoring systems were significantly well correlated. The IMS scoring system showed significant differences in T2DM remission rates between the procedures in the moderate stage, but the ABCD score showed no significant differences in each category. The discrimination power of the IMS score was comparable to that of the ABCD score at both 3 and 5 years. The revised IMS scoring system showed that SG-DJB had significantly higher T2DM remission rates in the moderate stage at 5 years than RYGB or SG. | ||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | 24 bariatric/metabolic surgeons from Japan, Korea and China | ||||||
| Participant flow | The number was planned to be 29, but it was reduced to 24. | ||||||
| Adverse events | No adverse events | ||||||
| Outcome measures | Comparison of 2 scoring systems and correction of thresholds for mild and moderate stages of IMS scores | ||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | Metabolic surgery |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000042370 |