| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000036876 |
| Receipt No. | R000042022 |
| Scientific Title | Motor cortex excitation and homeostatic plasticity by transcranial alternating current stimulation |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2019/05/28 |
| Last modified on | 2022/05/30 (Ver. 6) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Motor cortex excitation and homeostatic plasticity by transcranial alternating current stimulation | |
| Acronym | Motor cortex excitation and homeostatic plasticity by transcranial alternating current stimulation | |
| Scientific Title | Motor cortex excitation and homeostatic plasticity by transcranial alternating current stimulation | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Motor cortex excitation and homeostatic plasticity by transcranial alternating current stimulation | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Healthy and neurologically intact
adults |
|
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | The aim of this study is to investigate changes in brain activity during transcranial alternating current stimulation. |
| Basic objectives2 | Others |
| Basic objectives -Others | Electroencephalographic oscillations |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Exploratory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Electroencephalographic oscillations are recorded during transcranial alternating current stimulation. |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Cross-over |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Single blind -participants are blinded |
| Control | Placebo |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 3 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | Subjects are seated with their hands and forearms resting on their thighs. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is used to search for the hot spot of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. The electroencephalographic electrodes are attached to five places centered on the hot spot. A battery-powered current stimulator delivers 10 Hz sinusoidal stimuli for 20 minutes (peak-to-peak amplitude = 0.3 mA). Participants were asked to fixate the dot with their eyes before, during, and after stimulation. | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | Subjects are seated with their hands and forearms resting on their thighs. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is used to search for the hot spot of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. The electroencephalographic electrodes are attached to five places centered on the hot spot. A battery-powered current stimulator delivers 20 Hz sinusoidal stimuli for 20 minutes (peak-to-peak amplitude = 0.3 mA). Participants were asked to fixate the dot with their eyes before, during, and after stimulation. | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | Subjects are seated with their hands and forearms resting on their thighs. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is used to search for the hot spot of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. The electroencephalographic electrodes are attached to five places centered on the hot spot. A battery-powered current stimulator delivers sham stimuli for 20 minutes (peak-to-peak amplitude = 0 mA). Participants were asked to fixate the dot with their eyes before, during, and after stimulation. | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | The subjects are healthy, neurological intact, right-handed volunteers. In addition, screening shows that none are at risk for adverse events during transcranial magnetic stimulation. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | None | |||
| Target sample size | 20 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Tokyo Kasei University | ||||||
| Division name | Faculty of Health Sciences | ||||||
| Zip code | 350-1398 | ||||||
| Address | 2-15-1 Inariyama, Sayama City, Saitama | ||||||
| TEL | 042-955-6074 | ||||||
| suzuki-mak@tokyo-kasei.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Tokyo Kasei University | ||||||
| Division name | Faculty of Health Sciences | ||||||
| Zip code | 350-1398 | ||||||
| Address | 2-15-1 Inariyama, Sayama City, Saitama | ||||||
| TEL | 042-955-6074 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| suzuki-mak@tokyo-kasei.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Tokyo Kasei University |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Japanese Governmental office |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Research Ethics Committee of Tokyo Kasei University |
| Address | 2-15-1 Inariyama, Sayama City, Saitama |
| Tel | 042-952-1621 |
| kanaij@tokyo-kasei.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 東京家政大学(埼玉県) |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/2/195 | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 16 | ||||||
| Results | We found that 10 Hz- and 20 Hz-tACS resulted in larger alpha and beta oscillations, respectively, compared with the oscillations observed after sham-tACS. In addition, 10 Hz- and 20 Hz-tACS decreased the amplitudes of conditioned motor evoked potentials and increased alpha and beta activity, respectively. | ||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results |
|
||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | |||||||
| Participant flow | |||||||
| Adverse events | |||||||
| Outcome measures | |||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000042022 |