| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000036706 |
| Receipt No. | R000041821 |
| Scientific Title | Immune checkpoint inhibitor versus chemotherapy for elderly non-small cell lung cancer:a meta-analysis |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2019/05/13 |
| Last modified on | 2019/05/10 (Ver. 1) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Immune checkpoint inhibitor versus chemotherapy for elderly non-small cell lung cancer:a meta-analysis | |
| Acronym | ICI for elderly NSCLC | |
| Scientific Title | Immune checkpoint inhibitor versus chemotherapy for elderly non-small cell lung cancer:a meta-analysis | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | ICI for elderly NSCLC | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | non-small cell lung cancer | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy for NSCLC.
|
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Overall survival(OS)
|
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| Base | |
| Study type | Others,meta-analysis etc |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | patients with non-small cell lung cancer aged 65 years or older
|
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | patients with non-small cell lung cancer aged less than 65 years.
|
|||
| Target sample size | 1000 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Last name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Showa University School of Medicine
|
||||||
| Division name | Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology | ||||||
| Zip code | 142-8555 | ||||||
| Address | 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | +81-3-3784-8532 | ||||||
| koichi-a@med.showa-u.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| 1st name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Showa University School of Medicine | ||||||
| Division name | Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology | ||||||
| Zip code | 142-8555 | ||||||
| Address | 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | +81-3-3784-8532 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| koichi-a@med.showa-u.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University School of Medicine |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University School of Medicine |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University School of Medicine |
| Address | 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan |
| Tel | +81-3-3784-8532 |
| koichi-a@med.showa-u.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| Result | |
| URL related to results and publications | |
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 1920 |
| Results | |
| Results date posted | |
| Results Delayed | |
| Results Delay Reason | |
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |
| Baseline Characteristics | |
| Participant flow | |
| Adverse events | |
| Outcome measures | |
| Plan to share IPD | |
| IPD sharing Plan description | |
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | BACKGROUND:The details of the efficacy and safety profile of the Immune checkpoint inhibitor [ICI] against elderly non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC] have not been fully elucidated. Objective: To compare the efficacy for elderly people with NSCLC in ICI group and chemotherapy group. Methods:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. The primary endpoint was overall survival [OS] in the age group over 65 years. Results Six trials [n = 1920] were included in this analysis. OS was significantly better in the ICI group compared to the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.81). In the subgroup analysis by drug, each of the nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab groups was significantly better than the chemotherapy group (HR [95% CI] = 0.68 [0.51 to 0.92], 0.69 [0.51 to 0.93]. , 0.66 [0.52 to 0.83]). By treatment history, no significant difference was shown between the ICI group and the chemotherapy group in the first line group, but was significantly better in the ICI group compared to the chemotherapy group in the previously treated treated group (HR [95 [95] % CI] = 0.69 [0.59 to 0.81]). Subgroup analysis by PD-L1 expression rate showed that ICI group was significantly better than chemotherapeutic group in each group with expression rate of 1% or more and 50% or more (HR [95% CI] = 0.69 [0.51 to 0.93], 0.45 [0.29 to 0.70]). Conclusion: The effectiveness of ICI for elderly NSCLC was shown. Further clinical studies to validate the more detailed efficacy and safety profile of ICI for elderly NSCLC are desired. |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041821 |