Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000036588 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000041612 |
Scientific Title | Clinical trial of YAG laser vitreolysis for Weiss ring after posterior vitreous detachment |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2019/04/24 |
Last modified on | 2024/11/07 17:04:40 |
Clinical trial of YAG laser vitreolysis for floater caused by Weiss ring
Clinical trial of YAG laser vitreolysis for floater caused by Weiss ring
Clinical trial of YAG laser vitreolysis for Weiss ring after posterior vitreous detachment
Clinical trial of YAG laser vitreolysis for Weiss ring after posterior vitreous detachment
Japan |
floater caused by Weiss ring
Ophthalmology |
Others
NO
A multi-center randomized, single-blind, controlled trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of the YAG laser vitreolysis for Weiss ring after posterior vitreous detachment.by comparing treated group with the sham YAG laser (placebo) treated group.
Safety,Efficacy
Confirmatory
Pragmatic
Phase IV
Subjective change measured by visual questionnaire
a) visual acuity
b) ultrasound B scan
c) optical coherence tomography; OCT
d) fundus photo image
e) slit lamp examination, indirect ophthalmoscope,intra ocular pressure
f) National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25(VFQ-25)
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Single blind -participants are blinded
Placebo
2
Treatment
Device,equipment | Maneuver |
YAG laservitreolysis
sham YAG laser
20 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
1) at least 6 month of symptom associated with floaters
2) posterior vitreous detachment confirmed by clinical examination, OCT and ultrasound B scan
3) more than 4 on the score of visual disturbance due to floaters (0 = no symptom, 10 = intolerable)
4) Weiss ring more than 3 mm away from the retina and 5 mm away from the lens not applicable if pseudophakic patients) by B scan
5) able to take position for YAG laser
6) understands the risk of YAG laser resulting in retinal detachment, intraocular hemorrhage, retinal injury, cataract formation, optic disc injury, inflammation, and other events causing visual disturbance
7) willing to cooperate to the study protocol
8) only one eye for the study even if the patient had symptom in both eye
9) willing to sign informed consent
1) fellow eye with best corrected visual acuity bellow 0.4(20/50)
2) history of retinal break, retinal detachment, uveitis in the study eye
3) history of diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, or aphakia in the study eye
4) ongoing treatment of glaucoma or ocular hypertension by more than 2 kinds of glaucoma topical medication, history of glaucoma surgery in the study eye
75
1st name | Shigeru |
Middle name | |
Last name | Kinoshita |
ShijoKarasuma-Ganka Komuro Clinic
Department of Ophthalmology
604-8152
4th Floor High-medic Court, 652 Tearaimizu-cho, Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto
075-708-8004
shigeruk@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
1st name | Keiko |
Middle name | |
Last name | Misawa |
The Study Group for Laser Vitreolysis
Secretariat
104-0053
3rd floor Harumi Park Building, 3-2-22 Harumi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo
090-6009-7912
https://laser-vitreolysis.net
study1@laser-vitreolysis.net
The Study Group for Laser Vitreolysis
The Study Group for Laser Vitreolysis
Other
Kyoto Review Board
5th Floor, 15th Hase Building, 688 Takanna-cho, Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto
075-746-6835
Keigo.ishikawa1027@gmail.com
NO
2019 | Year | 04 | Month | 24 | Day |
https://laser-vitreolysis.net
Unpublished
https://laser-vitreolysis.net
49
In the YAG laser vitreolysis group, the 10-point visual disturbance score improved by 2.5 vs 0.4 in the sham group (difference, -2.1; 95% CI, -3.3 to -0.9; P < .001). The YAG laser vitreolysis group reported greater symptomatic improvement (54%) than controls (18%) (difference, 36.1; 95% CI, 20.0-52.3; P < .001).
2020 | Year | 05 | Month | 05 | Day |
The mean (SD) age of participants was 60.2 (10.0) years in the YAG laser vitreolysis treatment group (age range, 41-79 years; median age 60 years) and 60.5 (11.2) years in the sham group (age range, 40-88 years; median age, 60 years).
49 patients (49 eyes; 18 men and 31 women) with symptomatic Weiss rings were enrolled and followed for 6 months.
In the YAG laser vitreolysis group, no adverse events, including lens or retinal injury, were observed. In the sham group, one participant had pneumonia during the study period and admitted to the hospital.
Primary outcome at 6 months were subjective changes measured using a 10-point visual disturbance score. Secondary outcomes included improvement of visual disturbance expressed by percentage and a 5-level qualitative scale compared to baseline, postoperative floater symptoms (subjective symptoms and objective symptoms evaluated by funduscopy), and National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 (NEI VFQ-25).
Completed
2016 | Year | 11 | Month | 28 | Day |
2017 | Year | 01 | Month | 04 | Day |
2017 | Year | 03 | Month | 01 | Day |
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
2018 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
2018 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
2018 | Year | 10 | Month | 31 | Day |
2019 | Year | 04 | Month | 24 | Day |
2024 | Year | 11 | Month | 07 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041612