| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000036497 |
| Receipt No. | R000041586 |
| Scientific Title | Validation study of the efficacy of frailty discriminant score (FDS) in patients with urological cancers |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2019/04/14 |
| Last modified on | 2022/12/06 (Ver. 8) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Validation study of the efficacy of frailty discriminant score (FDS) in patients with urological cancers | |
| Acronym | Validation study of the efficacy of frailty discriminant score (FDS) in patients with urological cancers | |
| Scientific Title | Validation study of the efficacy of frailty discriminant score (FDS) in patients with urological cancers | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Validation study of the efficacy of frailty discriminant score (FDS) in patients with urological cancers | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Urological cancers (Prostate cancer: PC, bladder cancer: BC, upper tract urothelial carcinoma: UTUC, renal cell carcinoma: RCC)
Controls (Ctrl) Subjects who participated in the general health survey in the IWAKI health promotion project between 2013 and 2018. |
|
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To validate the efficacy of f frailty discriminant score (FDS) in patients with urological cancers |
| Basic objectives2 | Others |
| Basic objectives -Others | Non-inferiority study |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Explanatory |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Primary endpoint: Discrimination of Ctrl with cancer patients using FDS.
Validation of FDS on cancer status between the patients with PC vs. Ctrl, and between the patients with non-PC (BC, UTUC, RCC,) vs. Ctrl. Sample size calculation for primary endpoints (http://www.biosoft.hacettepe.edu.tr/easyROC/ ver.1.3.1) The sample size for non-PC non-inferiority margin <5% AUC for standard test : 0.967 Sample size calculation for testing noninferiority of a new test to a standard test ----------------------------------------- Input: ----------------------------------------- Type I error : 0.025 Power : 0.9 AUC for standard test : 0.967 Allocation ratio : 2 ----------------------------------------- Output: ----------------------------------------- Case : 139 Control : 287 Total : 417 ----------------------------------------- The sample size for PC non-inferiority margin <5% in AUC: AUC for standard test : 0.974 ----------------------------------------- Input: ----------------------------------------- Type I error : 0.025 Power : 0.9 AUC for standard test : 0.974 Allocation ratio : 2 ----------------------------------------- Output: ----------------------------------------- Case : 102 Control : 204 Total : 306 ----------------------------------------- |
| Key secondary outcomes | Secondary endpoints: Prognostic value
Validation of FDS on prognosis prediction in urological cancer patients between the FDS-high vs. -low. FDS-high and -low were defined >2.3 in non-PC and >3.3 in PC, respectively. Sample size calculation for secondary endpoints Overall survival (OS) between the FDS-high and -low. FDS-high: FDS>2.3 in non-PC patients and >3.3 in PC patients FDS-low: FDS =<2.3 in non-PC patients and =<3.3 in PC patients Our sample size calculations were based on the primary outcome of OS. Our previous study suggested the 2-year OS in patients with FDS-high and -low were 73% and 96%, respectively. Using 90% power and 2.5% two-sided alpha, the sample size to illustrate the superiority of FDS-high and -low was 68 participants per arm (an allocation ratio 1:1, total n = 136) will be required. Accounting for 15% withdrawal/loss to follow-up, 156 (78 vs. 78) participants will need to be recruited. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Observational |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Key inclusion criteria: 1) patients with PC, BC, UTUC, or RCC who can evaluate the frailty using FDS. 2) Agree with the frailty evaluation.
|
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | Key exclusion criteria: 1) patients with cancer except for PC, BC, UTUC, or RCC. 2) patients with severe general condition who could not evaluate the frailty using FDS.
Controls (Ctrl) |
|||
| Target sample size | 926 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Hirosaki Univ. | ||||||
| Division name | Urology | ||||||
| Zip code | 036-8562 | ||||||
| Address | 5 Zaifu-chou | ||||||
| TEL | +81172395091 | ||||||
| shingorilla2@gmail.com | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Hirosaki Univ | ||||||
| Division name | Urology | ||||||
| Zip code | 036-8562 | ||||||
| Address | 5 Zaifu-chou | ||||||
| TEL | +81172395091 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| shingorilla2@gmail.com | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Hirosaki Univ. School of Med. |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Hirosaki Univ. School of Med |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Government offices of other countries |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | Dept. of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Hirosaki Univ. School of Med. |
| Address | 5 Zaifu-chou |
| Tel | 0172-33-5111 |
| rinri@hirosaki-u.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31520152/ |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31520152/ | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 559 | ||||||
| Results | The frailty discriminant score (FDS) is a reliable and valid tool for assessing frailty and prognosis in patients with urological cancers. | ||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | We prospectively validate the efficacy of the frailty discriminant score (FDS) in individuals with urological cancers, as there has been growing importance in evaluating frailty in clinical practice. | ||||||
| Participant flow | A prospective, multicenter study was conducted from February 2017 to April 2019. We enrolled 258 patients with urological cancers and 301 community-dwelling participants who were assessed for frailty. Frailty was assessed using FDS that includes ten items, such as physical, mental, and blood biochemical tests. The primary outcome was the non-inferiority (margin 5%) of FDS in discriminating patients with urological cancers from controls (Ctrl). | ||||||
| Adverse events | none | ||||||
| Outcome measures | The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for each predictive test were calculated. The secondary endpoints included the prediction of overall survival between patients with urological cancer who have high and low FDS. | ||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | Statistical analyses of clinical data were performed using SPSS ver. 24.0 (IBM, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA), BellCurve for Excel (Social Survey Research Information Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), GraphPad Prism 5.03 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), and R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/). |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041586 |