| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000036212 |
| Receipt No. | R000041247 |
| Scientific Title | Prospective comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement with two different postoperative non weight bearing periods after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2019/03/15 |
| Last modified on | 2019/03/15 (Ver. 1) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Prospective comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement with two different postoperative non weight bearing periods after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts | |
| Acronym | Prospective comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement with two different postoperative non weight bearing periods after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts | |
| Scientific Title | Prospective comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement with two different postoperative non weight bearing periods after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Prospective comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement with two different postoperative non weight bearing periods after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Knee anterior cruciate ligament rupture
|
|
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | Bone tunnel enlargement following primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with soft tissue graft might be a severe disadvantage for revision surgery. The postoperative rehabilitation protocol including the non-weight-bearing periods were different depending on the surgeon or institute. To determine the relationship between femoral bone tunnel enlargement and the postoperative non-weight-bearing period after double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Bone tunnel enlargement was evaluated by computed digital radiographs (anteroposterior (A-P) and lateral views) taken on the first postoperative day and at 12 months. |
| Key secondary outcomes | 1.knee extension and flexion muscle strength
2.side to side difference 3.knee range of motion |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Single arm |
| Randomization | Non-randomized |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Uncontrolled |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 1 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | These cases who were undergoing primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts were allocated into two different postoperative non-weight-bearing protocol groups; the allocation was conducted in a serial consecutive, not randomized,fashion:the first consecutive group of patients(Group A)received 1 week of non-weight-bearing postoperatively;the second consecutive group of patients received 2 weeks of non-weight-bearing Group B).In the operation room,the knee was immobilized with a brace with the knee positioned in the angle 20 of flexion for both groups to maintain the same angle as during graft fixation at surgery to avoid stress on the grafts. After the protocol immobilization period, range of motion exercises were performed gradually, with knee flexion of 10 degrees started with a locked hard brace for 1 week, following which full extension was allowed for both groups. In group A, partial weight-bearing was started at 1 week following surgery, with full weight-bearing at 4 weeks. For group B, partial weight-bearing was started at 2 weeks after surgery, with full weight-bearing at 5 weeks. Therefore, the non-weight-bearing period of group A was 1 week, and that of group B was 2 weeks. All patients used the knee brace for the first 3 months after surgery. Jogging and running were allowed at 3 months postoperatively. Return to the athletic movement such as jumping or cutting actions were allowed at 6 months. and return to full sports activity was no sooner than 8 months after surgery | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | ||
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Subject
The present prospective, comparative clinical research was conducted in 2014, involving patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts, under the same surgical technique and the same surgical devices at our institute. The experimental design was reviewed and approved by the Committee for Ethics at our institution. The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. We obtained written, informed consent form from all patients and guardians for publication of this report and any accompanying images. As control, data of the patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with same procedure at 2012-13 in our institute were employed. Selection Criteria 1.Patients who completed the rehabilitation protocol during the follow-up period 2. Patients who could collected the full clinical and radiological data available, such as general clinical scores, knee extension/flexion muscle strength measurements, and femoral bone tunnel enlargement measured by digital radiography of the knee 12 months postoperatively. |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | 1.knee multiple ligament injury cases
2.ACL reconstruction with meniscal repair cases 3.The genu recurvatum cases 4.Re-injury cases 5.Under 15 years old cases 6.other unsuitable cases |
|||
| Target sample size | 30 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Last name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | University of Miyazaki Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Orthopaedic Surgery | ||||||
| Zip code | 8891692 | ||||||
| Address | 5200 Kihara Kiyotake Miyazaki 889-1692 JAPAN | ||||||
| TEL | 0985850986 | ||||||
| seikei@med.miyazaki-u.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| 1st name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | University of Miyazaki Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Orthopaedic Surgery | ||||||
| Zip code | 8891692 | ||||||
| Address | 5200 Kihara Kiyotake Miyazaki 889-1692 JAPAN | ||||||
| TEL | 0985850986 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| seikei@med.miyazaki-u.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | University of Miyazaki Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | None |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | University of Miyazaki Research Support Center |
| Address | University of Miyazaki Hospital |
| Tel | 0985850986 |
| seikei@med.miyazaki-u.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |
| URL related to results and publications | |
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 28 |
| Results | |
| Results date posted | |
| Results Delayed | |
| Results Delay Reason | |
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |
| Baseline Characteristics | |
| Participant flow | |
| Adverse events | |
| Outcome measures | |
| Plan to share IPD | |
| IPD sharing Plan description | |
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041247 |