Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000035991 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000040995 |
Scientific Title | To compare safety and efficacy of cyclosporine 0.05% and cyclosporine 0.09% eyedrops for dry eye (keratoconjunctivitis). |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2019/02/24 |
Last modified on | 2019/02/24 15:27:34 |
To compare safety and efficacy of cyclosporine 0.05% and cyclosporine 0.09% eyedrops for dry eye (keratoconjunctivitis).
Cyclosporine 0.05% versus 0.09% for dry eye.
To compare safety and efficacy of cyclosporine 0.05% and cyclosporine 0.09% eyedrops for dry eye (keratoconjunctivitis).
Cyclosporine 0.05% versus 0.09% for dry eye.
Asia(except Japan) |
Dry Eye Syndrome
Ophthalmology |
Others
NO
To compare safety and efficacy of Cyclosporine 0.05% and cyclosporine 0.09% eye drops for dry eye (keratoconjunctivitis).
Efficacy
Exploratory
Explanatory
Phase IV
Change from
baseline in subjective dry eye symptoms score.
Change from baseline in the Schirmer-1 test values as
a measure of tear production, TBUT as a measure of tear film
stability, and CIC scores (Nelson grade) for cellular morphology
and Goblet cell density.
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Double blind -all involved are blinded
Active
YES
YES
Institution is considered as a block.
NO
Numbered container method
2
Treatment
Medicine |
Group 1 received cyclosporine 0.05% eye drops twice daily for 12 weeks
Group 2 received cyclosporine 0.09% eye drops twice daily for 12 weeks.
18 | years-old | <= |
75 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
Subjects experiencing dry eye symptoms.
Patients with current ocular infection, history of laser in
situ keratomileusis, allergic conjunctivitis, herpetic eye disease,
diabetes, and liver diseases were excluded. Other exclusion
criteria were pregnant or lactating mothers, HIV, and hepatitis
B and C. Patients who
were allergic to fluorescein were excluded. Systemic
(tetracyclines and corticosteroids) or topical medications (other
than artificial tear supplements) that could affect tear production or
meibomian gland functions were discontinued before intervention.
However, patients were instructed not to use artificial tear
preparations, 2 hours before testing. Computer work was not
allowed during the course of the study as concurrent use of
visual display terminals may independently influence ocular
surface changes.
40
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Rahul Bhargava |
Laser Eye Clinic, Noida
Ophthalmology
Sctor 48, Noida, India 201301
+911204215085
brahul_2371@yahoo.co.in
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Deshbandhu Sood |
Citizen Right Protection Forum
NGO
Sector 27 Noida
919817062276
anujsafety@gmail.com
Laser Eye Clinic Noida
Laser Eye Clinic Noida
Self funding
NO
Rama Medical College Hospital, Pilkhuwa, Hapur, UP, India
2019 | Year | 02 | Month | 24 | Day |
http://www.bhargavaeyecare.in/
Unpublished
http://www.bhargavaeyecare.in/
Preinitiation
2018 | Year | 12 | Month | 24 | Day |
2019 | Year | 02 | Month | 01 | Day |
2019 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
2019 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
2019 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
2019 | Year | 02 | Month | 24 | Day |
2019 | Year | 02 | Month | 24 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000040995