| Recruitment status | Suspended |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000034618 |
| Receipt No. | R000039457 |
| Scientific Title | Development of an interventional composed approach with animation and dialogue for Hikikomori patients |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/10/24 |
| Last modified on | 2021/05/13 (Ver. 2) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Development of an interventional composed approach
with animation and dialogue for Hikikomori patients |
|
| Acronym | Development of an interventional composed approach
with animation and dialogue for Hikikomori patients |
|
| Scientific Title | Development of an interventional composed approach
with animation and dialogue for Hikikomori patients |
|
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Development of an interventional composed approach
with animation and dialogue for Hikikomori patients |
|
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | Social withdrawal , Hikikomori ,school refusal | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a combined approach using fictional narratives and dialogue on improving the profile of mood states, ,empathy of Hikikomori patients , as a primary endpoint. We set as secondary endpoint an improving in general mental health, relaxation and self esteem .We want to evaluate the overall efficacy on mental health and sociality of an exploratory program based on the use of fictional narratives and a constructed dialogue based on narrative therapy and cinema therapy . Due to the exploratory nature of the trial and the lack of previous researches we decided to set a variety of different outcomes .
We will explore if there is any difference on the dependent variables based on the use of animation versus text reading of fictional narratives,secondarily. Further we want to know the relative efficacy of watching ,reading fictional narratives and dialogue on the selected outcomes. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Exploratory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Explanatory |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | We will evaluate if the is any statistically significant difference in any value of psychological assessment scales before and right after the ending of the interventional program. The following scales will be used for the primary outcomes:
1) transport narrative questionnaire instrument 2) Abbreviated POMS Questionnaire 3) Multidimentional Empathy Scale (MES) |
| Key secondary outcomes | We will evaluate if the is any statistically significant difference in any value of psychological assessment scales before and right after the ending of the interventional program. The following scales will be used for secondary outcomes:
1) Questionnaire Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale 2) Relaxation rating scale 3) GHQ The General Health questionnaire |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Single blind -participants are blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | NO |
| Dynamic allocation | NO |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | YES |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | Narrative club program A
A group receiving animation movie watching session and dialogue session . Firstly an animated movie in which characters go though hardships and discover themselves able to overcome them will be used. The movie duration will be around 140 minutes. Structured dialogue The structured dialogue implemented in this research will be a method based on 1) Powell s therapeutic discussion 2) Bandura social learning theory 1971 ( observational learning and vicarious experience ) 3) Narrative therapy ( White and Epston, 1990) 4) Cinema therapy ( Gary Solomon). Taking advantage of the emotional transportation toward the characters of the story we will conduct a structured dialogue to enhance empathy , self efficacy and motivation for treatment of the patients using dialogue techniques . The animation movie and the dialogue program will be around 120 minutes per week, once a week. The duration of the program is about 3 weeks. Psychological assessment tests will be distributed immediately before the programs starts(before the first session) and just after the end of the third session. Workshop sheets will be distributed and collected after each session of the program. Homework sheets will be distributed after each session of the program ( not collected). |
|
| Interventions/Control_2 | Narrative club program B
A group receiving fictional narratives reading session and dialogue session . Firstly an extract of a fictional narrative novel in which characters go though hardships and discover themselves able to overcome them will be used. Structured dialogue The structured dialogue implemented in this research will be a method based on 1) Powell s therapeutic discussion 2) Bandura social learning theory 1971 ( observational learning and vicarious experience ) 3) Narrative therapy ( White and Epston, 1990) 4) Cinema therapy ( Gary Solomon). Taking advantage of the emotional transportation toward the characters of the story we will conduct a structured dialogue to enhance empathy , self efficacy and motivation for treatment of the patients using dialogue techniques . The fictional narrative reading session and the dialogue program will be around 120 minutes per week, once a week. The duration of the program is about 3 weeks. Psychological assessment tests will be distributed immediately before the programs starts(before the first session) and just after the end of the third session. Workshop sheets will be distributed and collected after each session of the program. Homework sheets will be distributed after each session of the program ( not collected). |
|
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | 1) Stable mental condition
2) Patients who received the permission by the attending physician 3) patients diagnosed with social withdrawal by a psychiatrist 4) Patients who had persisted social withdrawal symptoms for over 6 months 5) Patients 18 years of age or older (regardless of their gender) |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | 1) patients who have problems attend a multi-session program due to serious illness
2) patients who permission by their attending physician cant not be confirmed 3) Patients who may show difficulties attending the program due to acute psychosis and other mental disorders |
|||
| Target sample size | 30 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | University of Tsukuba | ||||||
| Division name | Faculty of Medicine | ||||||
| Zip code | |||||||
| Address | 1-1-1,Tennodai,Tsukuba City ,Ibaraki Prefecture, JAPAN | ||||||
| TEL | 029-853-3099 | ||||||
| tamaki@md.tsukuba.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | University of Tsukuba | ||||||
| Division name | Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, Major in Clinical Sciences | ||||||
| Zip code | |||||||
| Address | 1-1-1,Tennodai,Tsukuba City ,Ibaraki Prefecture, JAPAN | ||||||
| TEL | 029-853-3099 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| s1630453@u.tsukuba.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | |
| Address | |
| Tel | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| Result | |
| URL related to results and publications | |
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | |
| Results | |
| Results date posted | |
| Results Delayed | |
| Results Delay Reason | |
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |
| Baseline Characteristics | |
| Participant flow | |
| Adverse events | |
| Outcome measures | |
| Plan to share IPD | |
| IPD sharing Plan description | |
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Suspended | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000039457 |