| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000034703 |
| Receipt No. | R000039289 |
| Scientific Title | The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen with fever in intensive care units(ICU) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/10/30 |
| Last modified on | 2019/10/31 (Ver. 2) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen with fever in intensive care units(ICU) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis | |
| Acronym | The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen with fever in intensive care units(ICU) patients | |
| Scientific Title | The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen with fever in intensive care units(ICU) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen with fever in intensive care units(ICU) patients | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | critically ill patients | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | Fever is one of the most common symptoms regardless of outpatients or resident patients. When fever causes serious exhaustion for patients, antipyretic therapy using acetaminophen is commonly performed. There are several reports on the safety and effectiveness of antipyretic therapy with acetaminophen. However, it has been reported that administration of acetaminophen caused transient hypotension in about 50% of patients treated within intensive care unit (ICU). It has been reported that some treatment such as crystalloid infusion or increasing in vasopressor dose was necessary in about 30% of acetaminophen-induced hypotension. This supposes that administration of acetaminophen may affect the prognosis of severe ICU patients.
Paul Young et al recently reported that the number of ICU-free days to 28 day and 90-day mortality rate did not differ significantly between patients with suspected infection administered either acetaminophen or placebo. However, the influence of acetaminophen on hemodynamics has not studied in this trial. In the past report the trial itself has been discontinued because the early death has risen due to anti-pyretic therapy. It is necessary to do systematic review to disclose whether the administration of acetaminophen makes any influence on the patient's prognosis. |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | mortality at day 28 |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| Base | |
| Study type | Others,meta-analysis etc |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | ICU patients | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | none | |||
| Target sample size | 1000 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Department of general medicine | ||||||
| Zip code | |||||||
| Address | 2-1-1, Higashitsukurimichi, Aomori-shi, Aomori, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 017-726-8299 | ||||||
| to_kasai@hotmail.com | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Department of general medicine | ||||||
| Zip code | |||||||
| Address | 2-1-1, Higashitsukurimichi, Aomori-shi, Aomori, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 017-726-8299 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| shuns0114@gmail.com | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | None |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | |
| Address | |
| Tel | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| Result | |
| URL related to results and publications | |
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | |
| Results | |
| Results date posted | |
| Results Delayed | |
| Results Delay Reason | |
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |
| Baseline Characteristics | |
| Participant flow | |
| Adverse events | |
| Outcome measures | |
| Plan to share IPD | |
| IPD sharing Plan description | |
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | <primary outcome>
1.mortality at day 28 2.mortality at day 90 3.ICU-free days <secondary outcome> 1.the incidence of hypotension after injection of acetaminophen 2.therapeutic intervention at hypotension 3.quality of life(when leaving ICU) <subgroup analysis> 1.age(over 65 years),body(under body mass index 18) 2.dose of acetaminophen(over 1000 mg) <sensibility analysis> we perform the following sensibility analysis on primary outcome 1.Exclusion of non-double blind studies. 2.Exclusion of studies using imputed statistics. 3.Missing participants: Best-best scenario: all missing patients in the two groups remain unchanged Best-worst scenario: all missing patients in the intervention group remain unchanged and all missing patients in the control group have outcomes Worst-best scenario: all missing patients in the intervention group have outcomes and all missing patients in the control group remain unchanged *primary analysis(worst-worst scenario: all missing patients in the two groups have outcomes) |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000039289 |