| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000033519 |
| Receipt No. | R000038219 |
| Scientific Title | The new role of triage nurse ordering in emergency department depend on Emergency Severity Index : A randomized control trial |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/07/26 |
| Last modified on | 2021/07/28 (Ver. 11) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | The new role of triage nurse ordering in emergency department depend on Emergency Severity Index : A randomized control trial | |
| Acronym | The new role of triage nurse ordering in emergency department depend on Emergency Severity Index : A randomized control trial | |
| Scientific Title | The new role of triage nurse ordering in emergency department depend on Emergency Severity Index : A randomized control trial | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | The new role of triage nurse ordering in emergency department depend on Emergency Severity Index : A randomized control trial | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||||
| Condition | Expert triage nurse in the emergency department | |||
| Classification by specialty |
|
|||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |||
| Genomic information | NO | |||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of acuity decision and the prediction of resources between the ESI and the JTAS in Japan. |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Explanatory |
| Developmental phase | Phase II,III |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | The primary endpoint will establish the inter-rater reliability of the results on practice cases in each group.
The secondary endpoint will establish the inter-rater reliability of the results on practice cases in each urgency criteria. In addition, tertiary endpoint will be to verify the prediction accuracy of the resources. |
| Key secondary outcomes | At first, the Visual Analog Scale which can be indicator of subjective evaluation will be employed to measure usability of each triage tool.
Secondary, the total time taken to solve practice cases is related between the ESI and the JTAS. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Single blind -participants are blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | YES |
| Dynamic allocation | NO |
| Institution consideration | Institution is considered as adjustment factor in dynamic allocation. |
| Blocking | YES |
| Concealment | Pseudo-randomization |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | After completion of training with the ESI for 3 hours, subjects in each group will solve 80 practice cases. | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | After completion of review with the JTAS for 3 hours, subjects in each group solved 80 practice cases. | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Subjects have experienced in triage for 3 years or more and less than 10 years, have experienced in nurse for 10 years or more and less than 20 years. Moreover, subjects had except certified nurse specialist of critical care nursing and Japanese nurse practitioner. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | The exception criteria were as follows; do not have except certified nurse specialist of critical care nursing and Japanese nurse practitioner.Subjects do not have knowledge of basic acuity decision on a daily basis. | |||
| Target sample size | 80 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Kansai University of Social Welfare | ||||||
| Division name | Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing | ||||||
| Zip code | 678-0255 | ||||||
| Address | 380-3 Sinden, Ako, Hyogo | ||||||
| TEL | 0791-20-2704 | ||||||
| takaoka@kusw.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Kansai University of Social Welfare | ||||||
| Division name | Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing | ||||||
| Zip code | 678-0255 | ||||||
| Address | 380-3 Sinden, Ako, Hyogo | ||||||
| TEL | 0791-20-2704 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| takaoka@kusw.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Kansai University of Social Welfare |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Japan society for the promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research. |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Japanese Governmental office |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Research ethics committee of Kansai University of Social Welfare |
| Address | 380-3 Sinden, Ako, Hyogo |
| Tel | 0791-46-2525 |
| kusw-kango@kusw.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176721000763?via%3Dihub | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 23 | ||||||
| Results | Inter-rater agreement between expert triage nurses was kappa = 0.82 (almost perfect) in the ESI group and kappa = 0.74 (substantial) in the JTAS group. In addition, the UT and OT ratios were 20.3% and 14.8%, respectively, in the ESI group, and 30.3% and 16.7%, respectively, in the JTAS group.
The results revealed that the ESI scale was associated with higher agreement than the JTAS. |
||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results |
|
||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | |||||||
| Participant flow | |||||||
| Adverse events | |||||||
| Outcome measures | |||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000038219 |