Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000033189 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000037808 |
Scientific Title | Comparison of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) attached balloon versus colposcopy for diagnosing cervical cancer, including acceptability of the endoscope: An exploratory prospective study |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/06/29 |
Last modified on | 2020/11/18 16:59:17 |
Comparison of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) attached balloon versus colposcopy for diagnosing cervical cancer, including acceptability of the endoscope: An exploratory prospective study
Comparison of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) attached balloon versus colposcopy for diagnosing cervical cancer, including acceptability of the endoscope: An exploratory prospective study
Comparison of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) attached balloon versus colposcopy for diagnosing cervical cancer, including acceptability of the endoscope: An exploratory prospective study
Comparison of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) attached balloon versus colposcopy for diagnosing cervical cancer, including acceptability of the endoscope: An exploratory prospective study
Japan |
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasma, uteri cervical cancer
Obstetrics and Gynecology |
Malignancy
NO
Comparability of diagnostic accuracy of ME-NBI versus colposcopy, and comparison of patient's tolerability on each examination
Safety,Efficacy
Sensitivity for detecting the highest lesion which is CIN2 or more
The visible rate of whole circumferential transition zone
The proportion of visible internal cervical canal
The complication rate
Comparison of patient's tolerability on each examination using questionnaire
The diagnostic accuracy of CIN at different stages (CIN1, CIN2, CIN3 or more)
Specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CIN 2 or more detection
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Self control
1
Diagnosis
Device,equipment |
Prior to colposcopy, endoscopic examination using ME-NBI and 3% acetic acid dispersion is attempted for approximately ten minutes.
20 | years-old | <= |
65 | years-old | > |
Female
Patients diagnosed as ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL or HSIL by pap smear, or more than CIN3 by colposcopy are included.
Postoperative patients of cervical cancer, or patients with psychosis, or patients with pregnancy including suspicion are excluded.
95
1st name | Kunihisa |
Middle name | |
Last name | Uchita |
Kochi Redcross Hospital
Gastroenterology
780-8562
Hadaminamimachi 1-4-63-11 Kochi city
088-822-1201
ucchy31@yahoo.co.jp
1st name | Kunihisa |
Middle name | |
Last name | Uchita |
Kochi Redcross Hospital
Gastroenterology
780-8562
Hadaminamimachi 1-4-63-11 Kochi city
088-822-1201
ucchy31@yahoo.co.jp
Kochi Redcross Hospital
Ministry of Educaction, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Japanese Governmental office
Kagawa University Hospital, Osaka International Cancer Institute
Kochi Redcross Hospital
Hadaminamimachi 1-4-63-11 Kochi city
088-822-1201
ucchy31@yahoo.co.jp
NO
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 29 | Day |
Unpublished
88
The detection sensitivity for patients with CIN2+ was not statistically different between the two methods (both: 79%, 95% CI: 66%-88%). For diagnosing CIN2+, ME-NBI tended to show a higher sensitivity than colposcopy (69% vs 58%, respectively), while its specificity tended to be lower vs. colposcopy (55% vs 70%, respectively). Patients reported significantly less discomfort and embarrassment with ME-NBI vs colposcopy.
2020 | Year | 11 | Month | 18 | Day |
The 88 consecutive patients (median age: 40.5 years, range: 21-67 years) comprised 72 with positive PAP smear test results, 13 with follow-up HSIL, and 3 with definitive CIN3 confirmed by a referral hospital. HPV infection history was positive in 25 patients, negative in 5, and undetermined in 58. A history of HPV vaccination was present in 5 patients and absent in 83. The final diagnoses comprised non-cancerous lesions (8), CIN1 (32), CIN2 (13), CIN3 (34), and microinvasive carcinoma (1).
Eligible patients had positive PAP smear test results, suspicious high-grade CIN in previous colposcopy, or definitive CIN3 diagnosed previously. A gastrointestinal endoscopist examined the cervix using ME-NBI in an endoscopy room and, subsequently, a gynecologist blinded to the ME-NBI findings performed colposcopy in a different room. CIN2+ locations were documented in a scheme immediately after each examination. Punch biopsy samples were obtained from all areas diagnosed as CIN2+ with both methods and from one normal area.
none
The primary outcome was the detection sensitivity of patients with CIN2+, comparing ME-NBI and colposcopy.
The secondary outcome measures were the rates of visible whole circumferential transition zones, visible cervical orifice, and complications. Patient acceptance of both methods was compared by a questionnaire survey evaluating patients discomfort and embarrassment. Increasing degrees of discomfort and embarrassment were scored from 1-5. Patients were also asked which examination they would choose in future.
Completed
2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 26 | Day |
2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 26 | Day |
2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 26 | Day |
2020 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
2020 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
2020 | Year | 08 | Month | 31 | Day |
2020 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 28 | Day |
2020 | Year | 11 | Month | 18 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037808