Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000032924 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000037535 |
Scientific Title | Is there a difference in recurrence of knee pain between the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy and drag intervention: randomized controlled trial |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/06/15 |
Last modified on | 2021/05/17 10:28:54 |
Is there a difference in recurrence of knee pain between the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy and drag intervention: randomized controlled trial
Is there a difference in recurrence of knee pain associated with degenerative changes between the McKenzie approach and etodolac intervention: randomized controlled trial
Is there a difference in recurrence of knee pain between the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy and drag intervention: randomized controlled trial
Is there a difference in recurrence of knee pain associated with degenerative changes between the McKenzie approach and etodolac intervention: randomized controlled trial
Japan |
Knee pain
Orthopedics | Rehabilitation medicine |
Others
NO
To examine if there are differences in treatment effects and recurrence rate between interventions with McKenzie approach and etodolac for patients with knee pain and the KellgrenLawrence Grade 2-4
Safety,Efficacy
Time for recurrence
Flexion/extension range of motion using a goniometer (pre intervention; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 months after the initiation of the intervention)
Subjective pain in tensity (P4) (pre intervention; and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 months after the initiation of the intervention)
Quality of life (EQ5D)(pre intervention; and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 months after the initiation of the intervention)
Subjective disability (Patient Specific Functional Scale & Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) (pre intervention; and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 months after the initiation of the intervention)
Treatment effect (Global Rating Recovery Scale) (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 months after the initiation of the intervention)
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -but assessor(s) are blinded
Active
2
Treatment
Medicine | Maneuver |
8-week intervention with McKenzie approach
etodolac x 2/day [200mg/day] for 8 weeks
18 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
Outpatients coming to the Minami Shinjyuku Orthopedic Rehabilitation Clinic
Kellgren Lawrence grade of 2-4, confirmed by an orthopaedic surgeon
No contraindication for the use of etodolac
Knee pain lasting for more than 1 month with the intensity of 4 or more in the 0-10 numerical rating scale
Symptoms or movement impairments on the lower leg originated from tissues other than the knee
Communication difficulties in Japanese
Outpatients for the post-surgical management
History of the Around the Knee Osteotomy or the Total Knee Arthroplasty
60
1st name | Hiroshi |
Middle name | |
Last name | Takasaki |
Saitama Prefectural University
Physical Therapy
3438540
Sannomiya 820, Koshigaya, Saitama
0489734706
physical.therapy.takasaki@gmail.com
1st name | Sanshiro |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hashimoto |
Minami Shinjyuku Orthopedic Rehabilitation Clinic
Orthopedic
1510053
16-7, Yoyogi 2, Sibuya, Tokyo
0353020790
sansho@msorc.jp
Saitama Prefectural University
self funding
Self funding
Saitama Prefectural University
Sannomiya 820, Koshigaya, Saitama
0489710500
rinri@spu.ac.jp
NO
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 15 | Day |
Unpublished
0
Terminated
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 06 | Day |
2018 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
2018 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 17 | Day |
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 08 | Day |
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 17 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037535