| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000032807 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000037424 |
| Scientific Title | Dupixent Special Drug Use Investigation for long term use |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/06/11 |
| Last modified on | 2025/08/27 09:35:02 |
Dupixent Special Drug Use Investigation for long term use
Dupixent Special Drug Use Investigation for long term use
Dupixent Special Drug Use Investigation for long term use
Dupixent Special Drug Use Investigation for long term use
| Japan |
Atopic dermatitis
| Dermatology |
Others
NO
To collect safety and effectiveness information of Dupixent used in the post-marketing setting in patients with atopic dermatitis not adequately controlled with existing therapies.
Safety,Efficacy
Safety: Incidence rates of adverse drug reactions, Safety specification items of Dupixent, asthma attack
Effectiveness: Investigators global assessment (IGA), Peak weekly pruritus NRS
Observational
| Not applicable |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
-Patients with atopic dermatitis with inadequate response to conventional therapies
-Patients who newly start receiving the treatment with Dupixent
-Patients who can provide informed consent
Subjects who are participating in or have been registered for clinical trials with therapeutic intervention to Dupixent
900
| 1st name | Katsuhisa |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | SUZUKI |
Sanofi K.K.
Post-authorization regulatory studies, Medical Affairs
163-1488
3-20-2, Nishi Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 163-1488, Japan
03-6301-3867
Sanofi_Medical@sanofi.com
| 1st name | Public contact for Drug use surveillance |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | - |
Sanofi K.K.
Post-authorization regulatory studies, Medical Affairs
163-1488
3-20-2, Nishi Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 163-1488, Japan
03-6301-3867
Sanofi_Medical@sanofi.com
Sanofi K.K.
Sanofi K.K.
Profit organization
Not applicable because of Drug use surveillance
-
-
-
NO
| 2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 11 | Day |
NA
Published
https://doi.org/10.3389/jcia.2025.14794
989
Safety:At 2 years, the incidence rates of any ADR and serious ADRs (16.8% and 0.8%, respectively).
The most common ADRs were conjunctivitis (7.1%), allergic conjunctivitis (4.2%), and blepharitis (0.8%).
Effectiveness:At 2 years, significant improvements from baseline were observed for mean standard(deviation) EASI (from 30.1(13.2) to 4.0( 7.0), IGA (from 3.4(0.5) to 1.4(0.8)), and weekly peak pruritus NRS (from 6.9(2.1) to 1.8(1.6))scores (all P less than 0.001 vs. baseline).
| 2025 | Year | 08 | Month | 27 | Day |
| 2023 | Year | 03 | Month | 23 | Day |
In the publication of study results, only data from patients enrolled at participating institutions that have provided consent for publication were included.
In the safety analysis set, 679 patients (70.6%) were male, and most patients were adults (5.1% were adolescent patients aged 15-18 years. Approximately half of the safety analysis set (527 patients; 54.8%) had one or more comorbid allergic diseases at baseline; the most common were allergic rhinitis (194 patients; 20.2%), allergic conjunctivitis (139 patients; 14.4%), and asthma (104 patients; 10.8%). Among those with available data, the EASI score (mean SD) was 30.1(13.2) at baseline, and in line with clinical practice guidelines (2); most patients had IGA score 3 (460/862 patients; 53.4%) and IGA score 4 (388/862 patients; 45.0%) at dupilumab initiation.
989 individuals with moderate-to-severe AD who initiated treatment with dupilumab were registered in this PMS from 184 clinical sites
in Japan. Electronic CRFs were collected from 970 patients at 179 sites; after exclusions, the safety analysis set comprised 962 patients, and 892 of those were included in the effectiveness analysis set.
Over 2 years, ADRs were reported in 162 patients (16.8%),including eight patients (0.8%) with serious ADRs.
The most common ADRs were conjunctivitis [68 patients (7.1%), including one (0.1%) with a serious ADR], allergic conjunctivitis [40 patients (4.2%), including one (0.1%) with a serious ADR], and blepharitis [eight patients (0.8%), with no serious ADRs].
Effectiveness outcomes included changes in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) scores.
Main results already published
| 2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 13 | Day |
| 2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 13 | Day |
| 2018 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2023 | Year | 04 | Month | 07 | Day |
| 2023 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
Patient's backgrounds, Dupixent administration status, Previous and concomitant treatments against atopic dermatitis, Concomitant medications other than Atopic dermatitis treatment, Effectiveness evaluation items for Atopic dermatitis, Biomarkers, Patients reported outcomes, etc.
| 2018 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 08 | Month | 27 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037424