Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000032207 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000036554 |
Scientific Title | Comparison of the analgesic effect of intravenous acetaminophen with that of flurbiprofen axetil after lumbar disc surgery |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/04/16 |
Last modified on | 2019/03/26 11:02:43 |
Comparison of the analgesic effect of intravenous acetaminophen with that of flurbiprofen axetil after lumbar disc surgery
Comparison of the analgesic effect of intravenous acetaminophen with that of flurbiprofen axetil after lumbar disc surgery
Comparison of the analgesic effect of intravenous acetaminophen with that of flurbiprofen axetil after lumbar disc surgery
Comparison of the analgesic effect of intravenous acetaminophen with that of flurbiprofen axetil after lumbar disc surgery
Japan |
lumbar disc surgery
Anesthesiology |
Others
NO
Postoperative pain control is important after lumbar disc surgery. Because postoperative pain is the result of activation of different pain mechanisms, including nociceptive, neuropathic and inflammatory pains, multimodal analgesic are generally used. Although opioid, especially fentanyl, based analgesia is a well-established therapy for postoperative pain control, opioids increase the incidence of PONV and respiratory depression. Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were reported to reduce opioid consumption and opioid related side effects after lumbar disc surgery. However, there are few reports compared postoperative analgesic effects between flurbiprofen and acetaminophen after lumbar disc surgery. This prospective, randomized, open-label and placebo controlled study aimed to determine whether whether flurbiprofen produces equivalent analgesic effects to acetaminophen after lumbar disc surgery.
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Pragmatic
Not applicable
The pain score was evaluated by numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 hours postoperatively
Frequency of rescue rescue analgesics administration during 12hs, 24hs, postoperatively
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -but assessor(s) are blinded
Active
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
3
Treatment
Medicine |
All patients were anesthetized under total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil according to clinical requirement. All patients received bolus administration of 0.15mg fentanyl 30 min before the end of surgery and 0.1mg fentanyl at skin closure. Group P received 10mL of saline intravenously at end of surgery, and 6, 12, and 18 hrs postoperatively Postoperative pain was evaluated by nursing staffs using a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24h postoperatively. Frequency of use of rescue analgesics and consumption of rescue analgesics were recorded for 12 and 24h after surgery.
All patients were anesthetized under total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil according to clinical requirement. All patients received bolus administration of 0.15mg fentanyl 30 min before the end of surgery and 0.1mg fentanyl at skin closure. Group A received 1000mg of acetaminophen intravenously at end of surgery, and 6, 12, and 18 hr postoperatively. Postoperative pain was evaluated by nursing staffs using a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24h postoperatively. Frequency of use of rescue analgesics and consumption of rescue analgesics was recorded for 12 and 24h after surgery.
All patients were anesthetized under total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil according to clinical requirement. All patients received bolus administration of 0.15mg fentanyl 30 min before the end of surgery and 0.1mg fentanyl at skin closure. Group A received 50mg of flurbiprofen intravenously at end of surgery, and 6, 12, and 18 hr postoperatively. Postoperative pain was evaluated by nursing staffs using a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24h postoperatively. Frequency of use of rescue analgesics and consumption of rescue analgesics was recorded for 12 and 24h after surgery.
20 | years-old | <= |
80 | years-old | > |
Male and Female
The patients weighting 50-70kg who undergo elective lumbar spine surgery with ASA risk 1 or 2
1)renal disease
2)liver disease
3)ulcer
4)asthma
75
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yoshiaki Terao |
Nagasaki Rosai Hospital
Department of anesthesia
2-12-5, Setogoe, Sasebo, Nagasaki, Japan
0956-49-2191
yoterao@na-robyo.jp
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Maki Ohno |
Nagasaki Rosai Hospital
Department of anesthesia
2-12-5, Setogoe, Sasebo, Nagasaki, Japan
0956-49-2191
blaandjas@gmail.com
Nagasaki Rosai Hospital Medical Office
The Japan Labon Health and Welfare Organization
Japanese Governmental office
NO
2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 16 | Day |
Unpublished
Open public recruiting
2018 | Year | 02 | Month | 09 | Day |
2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 16 | Day |
2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 12 | Day |
2019 | Year | 03 | Month | 26 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000036554