Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000032025 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000036544 |
Scientific Title | Effect of sensory program on functional recovery of hemiplegic upper limb in acute stroke patients |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/04/01 |
Last modified on | 2024/03/14 15:43:32 |
Effect of sensory program on functional recovery of hemiplegic upper limb in acute stroke patients
Effect of sensory program on functional recovery of hemiplegic upper limb in acute stroke patients
Effect of sensory program on functional recovery of hemiplegic upper limb in acute stroke patients
Effect of sensory program on functional recovery of hemiplegic upper limb in acute stroke patients
Japan |
stroke
Rehabilitation medicine |
Others
NO
The aim of this study was to test whether the recovery of upper limb function in stroke patients would be enhanced by additionally carrying training aimed at improving sensory function.
Efficacy
Brunnstrom stage
Handgrip strength
Tactile-pressure threshold
Simple test for evaluating hand function (STEF)
Changes in handgrip strength, tactile pressure threshold, and STEF
Interventional
Parallel
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Active
2
Treatment
Maneuver |
Intervention group
<Rehabilitation program>
1.ROM (Range of motion) training
2.facilitation (voluntary promotion training)
3.Muscle-strengthening exercise
4.Mobility skill exercises such as transferring, sitting up and Walking exercises
5.Standard of Exercises for ADL
6.Higher brain dysfunction training
<Sensory training program>
Several types of discrimination task performed under blind condition.
1.Three types of sandpaper, cloth (fur, satin fabric, linen cloth), 3 types of materials (0.5mm sponge cushioning materials, bubble wrap, flat plastic plate)
2.Braille plate
Control group
<Rehabilitation program>
1.ROM (Range of motion) training
2.facilitation (voluntary promotion training)
3.Muscle-strengthening exercise
4.Mobility skill exercises such as transferring, sitting up and Walking exercises
5.Standard of Exercises for ADL
6.Higher brain dysfunction training
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
Medically stable
Had no peripheral neuropathy or history of other neurological conditions
Had adequate comprehension of instructions and perceptual ability for testing
All were assessed to be free of unilateral neglect using clinical observation and standard neuropsychological assessment (shape cancellation and line bisection)
The Mini-Mental State Examination, which all of them passed (border line passing score of 24)
Any participants that does not meet the conditions specified in the above shall be null and void
50
1st name | Jun |
Middle name | |
Last name | Murata |
Nagasaki University
Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
852-8520
1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8520, Japan
095-819-7923
jmura@nagasaki-u.ac.jp
1st name | Jun |
Middle name | |
Last name | Murata |
Nagasaki University
Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
852-8520
1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8520, Japan
095-819-7923
jmura@nagasaki-u.ac.jp
Nagasaki University
Ministry of Education
Japanese Governmental office
Japan
Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University
1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Japan
095-819-7923
jmura@nagasaki-u.ac.jp
NO
国立病院機構長崎医療センター/National Hospital Organization
Nagasaki Medical center
2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6508261
Published
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6508261
56
The mean change in the tactile pressure threshold was significantly larger in the experimental group than in the control group (p<0.05, d=0.59). Moreover, the completion times to manipulate a middle-sized ball (d=0.53) and small ball (d=0.80) and a small metal disc (d=0.81) in the experimental group were significantly different from those in the control group (p<0.05).
2024 | Year | 03 | Month | 14 | Day |
Subjects were hospitalized and receiving therapeutic interventions at the rehabilitation unit. The following inclusion criteria were used:first time stroke; the Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS-R) score higher than 21; no severe cognitive deficits that preclude clinical evaluations, such as aphasia and unilateral neglect; and no other serious medical conditions.
A quasi-randomized 2-group pretest-posttest was used to examine the effects of the sensory training program in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy on paralyzed upper limbs. During the research period between July 2015 and January 2016, thirty-one subjects participated in the experimental group that performed the sensory training program in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy. After the end of this research period, an additional 25 patients were enrolled during the research period between February 2016 and August 2017 as the control group that received standard rehabilitation therapy without the sensory training program.
none
The mean change in the tactile pressure threshold was significantly larger in the experimental group than in the control group (p<0.05, d=0.59). Moreover, the completion times to manipulate a middle-sized ball (d=0.53) and small ball (d=0.80) and a small metal disc (d=0.81) in the experimental group were significantly different from those in the control group (p<0.05).
Completed
2015 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
2014 | Year | 08 | Month | 04 | Day |
2015 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
2019 | Year | 11 | Month | 04 | Day |
2018 | Year | 03 | Month | 30 | Day |
2024 | Year | 03 | Month | 14 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000036544