| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000031835 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000036355 |
| Scientific Title | The efficacy of postoperative bio-chemoradiotherapy using cetuximab and docetaxel for cis-platinum intolerant high-risk head and neck cancer patients. |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/04/01 |
| Last modified on | 2025/09/26 12:52:03 |
The efficacy of postoperative bio-chemoradiotherapy using cetuximab and docetaxel for cis-platinum intolerant high-risk head and neck cancer patients.
The efficacy of postoperative B-CRT using Cmab and DTX for CDDP intolerant high-risk head and neck cancer patients.
The efficacy of postoperative bio-chemoradiotherapy using cetuximab and docetaxel for cis-platinum intolerant high-risk head and neck cancer patients.
The efficacy of postoperative B-CRT using Cmab and DTX for CDDP intolerant high-risk head and neck cancer patients.
| Japan |
The efficacy of postoperative bio-chemoradiotherapy using cetuximab and docetaxel for cis-platinum intolerant high-risk head and neck cancer patients.
| Oto-rhino-laryngology |
Malignancy
NO
For the advanced head and neck cancer patients, surgery is a common definitive therapy. After surgery, pathological evaluation is necessary for the decision of additional therapy. The pathological results of microscopically involved surgical margin of the primary site and/or extracapsular extension of the lymph nodes are considered to be core high-risk factors indicating poor prognosis. The outcome for patients with these high-risk factors may be improved by concurrent chemotherapy in additional administration during postoperative radiotherapy. The standard protocol for the postoperative chemoradiotherapy is the concurrent use of cis-platinum (CDDP) during radiotherapy for previous described high-risk patients. However, many of these patients are intolerant to CDDP, and one option to overcome these problems is the combined administration of cetuximab (Cmab) and docetaxel (DTX) during postoperative radiotherapy. We tried combination use of Cmab and DTX during postoperative radiotherapy for CDDP intolerant high-risk head and neck cancer patients in limited number and revealed the safety. Here we propose this trial to confirm the efficacy of postoperative bio-chemoradiotherapy using Cmab and DTX for CDDP intolerant high-risk head and neck cancer patients.
Efficacy
2-year disease free survival
2-year overall survival, 2-year recurrence free survival, and 2-year locoregional control survival
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Uncontrolled
1
Treatment
| Medicine |
Radiotherapy is delivered in conventional fractions of 1.8 Gy to a total dose of 66.6 Gy, 5 days per week, using 4-6 MV X-rays. The radiation fields are set up as the primary tumor and, prophylactically, the bilateral cervical lymph node area. The cervical lymph node area is received prophylactic doses of 45 Gy with lateral opposed fields to upper neck and anterior lower neck. The bio-chemotherapy regimen consists of weekly Cmab (week 1: 400mg/m2; subsequent weeks: 250 mg/m2) and DTX (25mg/m2).
| 20 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
Prior to enrollment in this trial, the patients must meet all of the following criteria: pathologically proven carcinoma; primary tumor located in the nasal/paranasal sinus, oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx; clinically advanced stage (stage III or IV) on visual and endoscopic examinations and imaging examinations; e.g., CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonic echo (US) and/or PET-CT; primary site assessed as resectable by definitive surgery and regional lymph node by neck dissection on CT, MRI and/or US; no distant metastasis on PET-CT (cM0); aged over 20 years old (regarded as legally adult in Japan); PS 0-2 on ECOG criteria; sufficient general condition for the operation under general anesthesia; CDDP intolerant; e.g., advanced age (over 75-year-old), poor renal function (e-GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2), insufficient bone marrow function (white blood cell count < 3,000/mm3, neutrophil count < 1,500/mm3, platelet count < 7.5x104/mm3), hearing impairment, drug allergy, past history of CDDP use and/or poor general condition; and provision of written informed consent.
Prior to enrollment in this trial, the patients must not meet any of the following criteria: uncurable synchronous malignancies, priority systemic diseases, and refusal to undergo the definitive surgery and/or postoperative radiotherapy.
35
| 1st name | Nobuhiko |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Oridate |
Yokohama City University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
236-0004
3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004
045-787-2687
noridate@yokohama-cu.ac.jp
| 1st name | Goshi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Nishimura |
Yokohama City University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
236-0004
3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004
045-787-2687
gnishimu@yokohama-cu.ac.jp
Yokohama City University Hospital
Yokohama City University Hospital
Other
Yokohama City University
3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004
045-370-7627
rinri@yokohama-cu.ac.jp
NO
| 2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/index.cgi
Unpublished
Examination Cancellation
0
No subscribers, no track record
| 2025 | Year | 09 | Month | 26 | Day |
When treating pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, the ideal outcome is achieving both a cure for the disease and preserving functions such as speech and swallowing. Surgery has developed as the primary treatment method when the focus is on curing the disease, while radiation therapy has evolved as the main approach when the emphasis is on preserving function. However, considering the collateral damage associated with treatment, current methods still have room for improvement in simultaneously achieving cure and function preservation.
This study included patients deemed eligible for TOVS as initial therapy and, if present, for neck dissection (primarily T1-2 cases of laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer, with resectable N stages) who were deemed suitable for TOVS as initial therapy and also eligible for neck dissection due to cervical lymph node metastasis. Based on postoperative pathological findings, patients were assigned to either the observation group (negative primary tumor resection margins and negative extranodal lymph node involvement in the neck) or the postoperative radiotherapy group (positive or suspected positive primary tumor resection margins and/or positive extranodal lymph node involvement in the neck) for prognostic follow-up.
Adverse events associated with general surgery include pain, infection, bleeding, and symptoms related to general anesthesia. Adverse events associated with TOVS surgery include dysarthria/dysphonia, oral intake impairment, and airway stenosis. Adverse events associated with rare-site dissection include neck pain and upper arm mobility restriction. Adverse events associated with radiation therapy include early effects (stomatitis, dermatitis, edema, etc.) and late effects (salivary secretion impairment, dysphagia, etc.).
Recent years have seen remarkable advances in supportive equipment for cancer treatment. One such development is the video laryngoscope. Surgery for pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, previously performed using the naked eye or surgical microscopes, now enables more precise observation and strict resection using high-precision endoscopic systems (transoral videolaryngoscopi surgery, TOVS). The surgery involves inserting a video laryngoscope through the mouth for observation and resection. Since the pharynx and larynx occupy a limited space, this procedure is generally indicated for early-stage primary cancers. If cervical lymph node metastasis is present, neck dissection is performed either on the same day or at a later date.
Under conventional treatment guidelines, radiation therapy is used when early-stage cancer is confined to the primary tumor. For advanced cancer where the primary tumor has progressed or metastasis is present in the cervical lymph nodes, extended surgery with reconstruction or radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy is performed. Radiation therapy carries significant burdens for patients, including salivary secretion disorders and muscle stiffness from the neck to the shoulders. Surgery involving reconstruction carries disadvantages such as loss of voice and impaired swallowing function due to laryngectomy. Furthermore, patients requiring such extensive surgery often undergo radiation therapy postoperatively. While generally milder than radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy, this can still cause reduced saliva production and restricted mobility in the neck and shoulder area.
TOVS is a treatment method that aims to achieve both curative potential and functional preservation by excising the primary tumor at the minimum necessary size to avoid these drawbacks. However, disadvantages of TOVS include that surgical indications are generally limited to early-stage primary cancers, and the limited surgical space may result in inadequate visualization or resection in some areas. Following treatment guidelines traditionally advocated in Europe and the US, the need for postoperative radiation therapy is determined based on the pathological examination results of the surgical specimen. The criteria proposed by the US RTOG or the European EORTC are globally recognized standards for determining the need for postoperative radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. However, these criteria include both common and non-common items. When explaining TOVS eligibility to patients, the goal is to achieve curative intent and preserve function using TOVS alone, while maximally avoiding the disadvantages associated with radiation therapy. However, it is a fact that a certain proportion of patients will require postoperative radiation therapy: failing to provide necessary treatment for these patients would also be detrimental to them. In this study, we considered the common items from the criteria proposed by the aforementioned institutions to be the core of eligibility. Therefore, postoperative radiation therapy is added only in the following two cases:1) When the resection margin of the primary tumor removed by TOVS is inadequate (however, if complete resection is deemed possible by performing TOVS again, additional resection may be prioritized), and 2) When metastatic lymph nodes in patients who underwent neck dissection showed extralymphatic infiltration. For all other patients, continued additional radiotherapy after surgery is deemed unnecessary. Regardless of which group a patient belongs to, standard follow-up care, including regular examinations, various tests, and additional treatment in case of recurrence, is performed equally. This study aims to rigorously restrict postoperative radiotherapy and confirm whether the disease can be managed with surgery alone.
Disease-free survival period
Enrolling by invitation
| 2018 | Year | 03 | Month | 05 | Day |
| 2018 | Year | 03 | Month | 05 | Day |
| 2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2023 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2018 | Year | 03 | Month | 22 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 09 | Month | 26 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000036355