| Recruitment status | Main results already published |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000031313 |
| Receipt No. | R000035738 |
| Scientific Title | Effectiveness of personalized advice using a cancer risk prediction tool on modifying lifestyle habits: a randomized controlled trial |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/02/16 |
| Last modified on | 2021/08/24 (Ver. 9) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Effectiveness of personalized advice using a cancer risk prediction tool on modifying lifestyle habits: a randomized controlled trial | |
| Acronym | A cancer risk prediction tool for lifestyle modification: a randomized controlled trial | |
| Scientific Title | Effectiveness of personalized advice using a cancer risk prediction tool on modifying lifestyle habits: a randomized controlled trial | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | A cancer risk prediction tool for lifestyle modification: a randomized controlled trial | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | Healthy participants | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To evaluate the effectiveness of giving personalized advice using a probability calculated by a prediction model of cumulative cancer risk based on lifestyle factors on lifestyle modification, compared to standard advice for the prevention of cancer not using risk probability. After the advice was given, all randomized individuals were invited to participate in the same program for lifestyle modification. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Exploratory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Pragmatic |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Change in lifestyle within 6 months after receiving an advice
We defined the five healthy lifestyle habits as non-smoking, moderate or no alcohol consumption, moderate salt intake, adequate physical activity, and appropriate body mass index. Participants were assigned a score of 1 if they had the healthy lifestyle habit and a score of 0 if they did not. The individual scores were then summed and used as an index (5 = no risk factors; 0 = all risk factors). The primary outcome was defined as an increase in the index within 6 months after receiving an advice. |
| Key secondary outcomes | 1. Participation in a program for lifestyle modification within 6 months after receiving an advice
2. Change in lifestyle within 12 months after receiving an advice 3. Change in each lifestyle habit within 6 and 12 months after receiving an advice 4. Associations between lifestyle at baseline or change in lifestyle and lifestyle-related diseases or death as an observational study |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Single blind -investigator(s) and assessor(s) are blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | YES |
| Dynamic allocation | NO |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | YES |
| Concealment | Central registration |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Educational,Counseling,Training | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | The intervention group was given personalized advice based on a probability calculated by a prediction model of 10-year cumulative cancer risk according to five healthy lifestyle habits, and invited to participate in a program for lifestyle modification.
|
|
| Interventions/Control_2 | The control group was given standard advice about lifestyle modification for the prevention of cancer and invited to participate in the same program as the intervention group. | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | 1) Individuals who bought life insurance from The Dai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited from November, 2017 to March, 2018
2) Individuals aged 40-64 years old on January 1st, 2018 3) Individuals who were both policy holders and insured persons on the life insurance contract 4) Individuals who consented to participating in this study and answered a baseline questionnaire 5) Individuals who had any one of five lifestyle habits used for calculation of cumulative cancer risk that needed improvement We sent a consent form and a baseline questionnaire to individuals who met criteria 1-3). Individuals who met criteria 1-5) were eligible for randomization. Individuals who met criteria 1-4) were eligible for the observational study. |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | None. | |||
| Target sample size | 7000 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | National Cancer Center, Japan | ||||||
| Division name | Division of Prevention, Center for Public Health Sciences | ||||||
| Zip code | 104-0045 | ||||||
| Address | 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-ku Tokyo, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 03-3542-2511 | ||||||
| tshimazu@ncc.go.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | National Cancer Center, Japan | ||||||
| Division name | Division of Prevention, Center for Public Health Sciences | ||||||
| Zip code | 104-0045 | ||||||
| Address | 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-ku Tokyo, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 03-3547-5201(ext.3348) | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| riskcheck_RCT@ml.res.ncc.go.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | National Cancer Center, Japan |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Government offices of other countries |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | Japan |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | The Dai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | National Cancer Center Institutional Review Board |
| Address | 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-ku Tokyo, Japan |
| Tel | 03-3542-2511 |
| NCC_IRBoffice@ml.res.ncc.go.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 国立がん研究センター(東京都) |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33771848/ |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33771848/ | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 5891 | ||||||
| Results | The proportion of participants who improved their lifestyle within 6 months in the intervention group did not significantly differ from that in the control group (18.4% vs. 17.7%; P = 0.488). Among participants with low health literacy and two or fewer of five healthy habits, the proportion of participants subscribing to the lifestyle modification program was higher in the intervention group than in the control group. | ||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | The intervention group
Participants: 2,947 (Male: 53.1%) Mean age: 51.3 years The control group Participants: 2,944 (Male: 53.1%) Mean age: 51.2 years |
||||||
| Participant flow | The baseline questionnaire was sent to 59,892 eligible persons. Those of 6,534 completed the baseline questionnaire and were enrolled in the study, of whom 5,894 with one or more unhealthy lifestyle habits were randomly assigned to the intervention or control groups. | ||||||
| Adverse events | None. | ||||||
| Outcome measures | The primary outcome in the intervention group was not significantly different from that in the control group (proportion of participants who improved their lifestyle within 6 months, 18.4% vs. 17.7%; P=0.488). In the most of the secondary outcome analyses, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. In the subgroup analyses, among participants with low health literacy and two or fewer of five healthy habits, the proportion of participants subscribing to the lifestyle modification program was higher in the intervention group than in the control group. | ||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Main results already published | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000035738 |