UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000030571
Receipt number R000034841
Scientific Title An Exploratory Randomized comparative clinical trial for the preventive effect of Denosumab versus Zoledronic acid against bone loss around femoral implants after total hip arthroplasty
Date of disclosure of the study information 2017/12/26
Last modified on 2024/07/18 09:19:25

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

An Exploratory Randomized comparative clinical trial for the preventive effect of Denosumab versus Zoledronic acid against bone loss around femoral implants after total hip arthroplasty

Acronym

An Exploratory Randomized comparative clinical trial for the preventive effect of Denosumab versus Zoledronic acid against bone loss around femoral implants after total hip arthroplasty

Scientific Title

An Exploratory Randomized comparative clinical trial for the preventive effect of Denosumab versus Zoledronic acid against bone loss around femoral implants after total hip arthroplasty

Scientific Title:Acronym

An Exploratory Randomized comparative clinical trial for the preventive effect of Denosumab versus Zoledronic acid against bone loss around femoral implants after total hip arthroplasty

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Patients with hip osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis who are undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Classification by specialty

Orthopedics

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness and safety of Denosumab or Zoledronic acid for prevention of bone loss around femoral implants of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

Changes in bone mineral density around the femoral implants in 1 year after total hip arthroplasty.

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Parallel

Randomization

Randomized

Randomization unit

Cluster

Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Active

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

2

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Medicine

Interventions/Control_1

Denosumab is administered by injection along with Eldecalcitol biannually.

Interventions/Control_2

Zoledronic acid is administered by injection along with Eldecalcitol once a year.

Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

80 years-old >

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

1)Patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis or necrosis and are undergoing total hip arthroplasty for the first time;
2)Patients who are using SL-PLUS MIA HA stem (Smith & Nephew) for their implants;
3)Patients who have been diagnosed with osteoporosis;
4)Men aged 20 to 79 or women aged 50 to 79
who had the last menstruation over a year ago at the time of informed consent;
5)Patients who can write the informed consent on their own.

Key exclusion criteria

1)Patients who have taken the following drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis:
a)calcium, b)female hormone, c)activated vitamin D3, d)vitamin K, e)bisphosphonate, f)SERM, g)calcitonin, h)parathyroid hormone, PTH, i)Anti-RANKL antibody, j)Ipriflavone and k)Anabolic hormone
2)Patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis;
3)Patients diagnosed with diabetes (HbA1c>7.6) within 14 days of pre-registration;
4)Patients who has/had suffered from urinary tract stones;
5)Patients who are having tooth extraction or an implant at the time of registration or during a study period;
6)Patients with liver dysfunction (GOT>36IU/L, GPT>36IU/L) within 14 days of pre-registration;
7)Patients with urinary dysfunction (creatinine clearance<35ml/min) within 14 days of pre-registration;
8)Patients with serum calcium level of less than 9.0 or more than of 10.2;
9)Patients with paralysis or a brain degenerative disease;
10)Patients with systemic infection;
11)Patients who cannot take medicine orally;
12)Patients with gastrointestinal disorder that might inhibit the absorption of medicines;
13)patients who are disqualified as sample for this research by principal and co-investigator.

Target sample size

80


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Naomi
Middle name
Last name Kobayashi

Organization

Yokohama City University Medical Center

Division name

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Zip code

2320024

Address

4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan

TEL

045-261-5656

Email

naomik58@aol.com


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Taro
Middle name
Last name Tezuka

Organization

Yokohama City University

Division name

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Zip code

2360004

Address

Yokohama

TEL

+81457872655

Homepage URL


Email

tettu59@hotmail.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

Yokohama City University, Orthopaedic Surgery

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Yokohama City University

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Clinical Research Coordination Department, Center for Novel and Exploratory Clinical Trials

Address

3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama

Tel

+81-45-787-2714

Email

nextjim1@yokohama-cu.ac.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2017 Year 12 Month 26 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

N/A

Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications

N/A

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

28

Results

In zone 1, denosumab significantly reduced periprosthetic bone mineral density loss compared to zoledoronic acid. As for zone 7, however, denosumab and zoledronic acid showed similar effects on bone mineral density loss.

Results date posted

2024 Year 07 Month 18 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics

Patient background of the denosumab and zoledronic acid groups is shown below.
Number of patients 12/10, female:male 11:1/10:0, mean age (years) 68.7/68, BMI (kg/m2)24.4/26, OA: ONFH 12:0/10:0, JOA score 48.8/48, Harris Hip Score 58/53, lumbar spine bone density frontal image (g/cm2)0.94/ 0.92, Lateral image of lumbar spine bone density (g/cm2)0.59/0.57.

Participant flow

Participants who are scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty and meet the selection criteria will receive an explanation from their treating physician, and if they agree, they will be randomly assigned to either the denosumab or zoledronic acid group by simple randomization after eligibility confirmation. In the denosumab group, the drug is administered once every 6 months, and in the zoledronic acid group, the drug is administered once a year. Both groups are also to take eldecalcitol once daily. Participants will undergo peri-implant bone density testing at 1 week, 6 months, and 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Clinical evaluations will be conducted at six months and one year postoperatively. Adverse drug events will also be investigated.

Adverse events

No apparent adverse events were observed in the participants.

Outcome measures

The primary endpoints were changes in bone mineral density around the femoral implant and adverse events at 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Secondary endpoints were changes in bone mineral density around the femoral implant and clinical and functional assessments at 1 week, 6 months, and 1 year after total hip arthroplasty.

Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2017 Year 10 Month 20 Day

Date of IRB

2017 Year 11 Month 15 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2018 Year 01 Month 10 Day

Last follow-up date

2020 Year 06 Month 30 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

The reason the protocol and results were not published was due to a change in the person in charge at the time and the fact that the target number of patients could not be reached and a sufficient number of cases could not be collected for analysis.


Management information

Registered date

2017 Year 12 Month 26 Day

Last modified on

2024 Year 07 Month 18 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000034841