| Recruitment status | Preinitiation |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000030149 |
| Receipt No. | R000034367 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Development of a method of Caring in Nursing for the Elderly in Cooperation with a Caring Nurse Robot |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/12/15 |
| Last modified on | 2017/11/27 (Ver. 1) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Development of a method of Caring in Nursing for the Elderly in Cooperation with a Caring Nurse Robot | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | Development of a method of Nursing with a Caring Nurse Robot | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Mild dementia | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | This study consider how to practice nursing as a caring for dementia patients based on the Transactive Relationship Theory of Nursing (TRETON) which developed by Dr. Tanioka, a research director who presented a new relationship between Caring Nurse Robot (CNR) and patients, healthcare providers (nurses, care workers, etc.), and older adults with dementia. This clarifies necessary nursing functions in the transactive relations. Also, clarify the nursing methodology (effects, ethical issues, improvement points, etc.) as a caring in nursing by TRETON when practical use of CNR. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Exploratory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Pragmatic |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | (1) Sensory evaluation
Evaluate the mood, impression, satisfaction when talking with CNR which improved Pepper. (2) Verification test Evaluate the autonomic nervous activity (HF, LF / HF), sleep efficiency, sleeping time, acceleration, activity amount obtained from Actigraph, range of joint motion of upper and lower limbs, isometric muscle strength. |
| Key secondary outcomes | (1) Sensory evaluation
Analysis of evaluation items by free description |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Single arm |
| Randomization | Non-randomized |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Uncontrolled |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 1 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Prevention | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | 1) Natural language dialogue (NLD) program is created in which older adults with dementia can feel enjoy and uplifting. Also, considering ethical issues related to clinical use of caring nurse robot (Sensory evaluation 1).
2) Clarify the function of nursing as caring by TRETON which necessary for CNR. Also prepare a varification test and pre-test of created NLD program (Sensory evaluation 2, Verification test 1,2). 3) CNR with improved Pepper (RP - CNR) is used in the clinical setting. This stage will continue to consider ethical issues. Then, we modify the program based on the verification test (Sensory evaluation 3, Verification test 3). We clarify the necessary nursing functions for healthy elderly people and elderly people with dementia from the database for the RP - CNR obtained in the second and third stages. Also develop an interface for sharing information among the RP-CNR, nurses and other healthcare providers. 4) The RP-CNR will be improved for clinical use and put to practical use. |
|
| Interventions/Control_2 | ||
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Person who can conduct interpersonal conversation
1. Sensory evaluation 1 (1)120 healthy people who participated in the summer festival at Mifune Hospital (2) Age ranges 20 - 95 2. Sensory evaluation 2 (1) Healthcare providers working at Mifune Hospital, Fukujyu-sou (120 people) (2) Age ranges 20 - 65 (3) Those who can measure their blood pressure by themselves and show them to CNR who has improved Pepper 3. Sensory evaluation 3 (1) 120 people including inpatients at Miho Hospital's dementia treatment hospital, residents of Fukujyu-sou, day service users, etc. (2) Age ranges 65 - 95 (3) Those who can measure blood pressure by hand through an automatic sphygmomanometer and show it to CNR with improved Pepper 4. Verification test 1, 2, 3 1) 90 elderly men and women who have moved to Fukujyu-sou and are undergoing diagnosis of dementia satisfying the following conditions (30 people, 3 times) (1) Degree of dementia revised Hasegawa formula simple intelligence evaluation scale (HDS - R) 5 - 15 points (2) Those who can simultaneously measure Actigraph and heart rate variability (3) Age ranges 70 - 95 2) Healthy adult male and female 90 people (30 people, 3 times) satisfying the following conditions (1) Nonsmokers who can refrain from alcohol intake during the research cooperation period, and medical workers (2) People without heart disease (3) Those who can simultaneously measure Actigraph and heart rate variability (4) Age ranges 20 - 65 3) 90 healthy elderly men and women with the following conditions (30 people, 3 times) (1) Those who are non-smokers and who can refrain from alcohol intake during the research cooperation period (2) People without heart disease (3) Those who can simultaneously measure Actigraph and heart rate variability (4) Age ranges 65 - 95 |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Sensory evaluation 1, 2
Nothing special 2. Sensory evaluation 3 Those who are severely demented and have a lack of conversation and judgment 3. Verification test 1, 2, 3 (1) Those with heart disease are excluded from the subject because they affect the analysis of balance of autonomic nervous activity. However, person with hypertension can include in the subject. (2) Those who are likely to cause skin symptoms (itching, redness, etc.) on electrode seals and Actigraph for measuring heart rate variability are excluded. (3) Those taking sleep inducing agents or anxiolytic agents. However, those who are judged by the physician which medicine do not to affect the intervention of this survey can include. |
|||
| Target sample size | 630 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Tetsuya Tanioka |
| Organization | Tokushima University |
| Division name | Department of Nursing Outcome Management,Institute of Biomedical Sciences |
| Address | 18-15 Kuramoto-cho 3 Tokushima, 770-8509, Japan |
| TEL | 088-633-9021 |
| tanioka.tetsuya@tokushima-u.ac.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Tetsuya Tanioka |
| Organization | Tokushima University |
| Division name | Department of Nursing Outcome Management,Institute of Biomedical Sciences |
| Address | 18-15 Kuramoto-cho 3 Tokushima, 770-8509, Japan |
| TEL | 088-633-9021 |
| Homepage URL | |
| tanioka.tetsuya@tokushima-u.ac.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Tokushima University |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (FY2017)<KAKENHI> |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Japanese Governmental office |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | Japan |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 三船病院(香川県)、介護老人保健施設福寿荘(香川県)/ Mifune Hospital(Kagawa), Fukujusou(Kagawa) |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Preinitiation | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date | |||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000034367 |