| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000030038 |
| Receipt No. | R000034300 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Exploratory study for dry eye patient satisfaction with treatment |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/11/20 |
| Last modified on | 2018/05/21 (Ver. 2) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Exploratory study for dry eye patient satisfaction with treatment | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | Exploratory study for dry eye patient satisfaction with treatment | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Dry eye | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To investigate degree of satisfaction with treatment for dry eye patients prescribed dry eye therapeutic ophthalmic solution. |
| Basic objectives2 | Others |
| Basic objectives -Others | Treatment satisfaction |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Treatment satisfaction
Factor analysis of satisfaction Relationship between patient background and ophthalmic findings / symptoms |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| Base | |
| Study type | Observational |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | 20 years of age or over
Regardless of sex Diagnosed dry eye and use Diquafosol sodium ophthalmic solution or Sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution 0.1% for more than 3 months. |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | Having advanced ocular disorder due to ocular pemphigus or Stevens Johnson syndrome
Using a punctal plug and performing a punctal closure procedure Diquafosol sodium ophthalmic solution and sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution are used in combination. Treated with Rebamipide suspension eye drop Subject with hypersensitivity to fluorescein The investigator judges that the subject is ineligible as the study subject. |
|||
| Target sample size | 100 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Masayo Hashimoto |
| Organization | Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
| Division name | Japan Medical Affairs, Medical Affairs, Global R&D |
| Address | 4-20, Ofukacho, Kita-ku, Osaka |
| TEL | 06-4802-9604 |
| clinical@santen.co.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Kazuhisa Suwaki |
| Organization | Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
| Division name | FOTE Team |
| Address | 4-20, Ofukacho, Kita-ku, Osaka |
| TEL | 06-4802-9604 |
| Homepage URL | |
| clinical@santen.co.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Profit organization |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date | |||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Published |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | Inclusion for Analysis: 100 cases [20 males,80 females, Age:70.7 plus or minus 11.2, Elapsed time since diagnosis of dry eye: 62.7 plus or minus 35.7 months]
Treatment satisfaction: Very satisfied 10.0%, satisfied 43.0%, normal 44.0%, dissatisfied 3.0%. Factor analysis of satisfaction [the most important reason for satisfaction]: moisture feeling 29.0%, dryness improvement 19.0%, foreign body sensation improvement 15.0%. Relationship between patient background and ophthalmic findings / symptoms: No clear correlation was found. DEQS score: 13.6 plus or minus 13.3, BUT: 3.9 plus or minus 2.3 sec, corneal and conjunctival staining score: 2.2 plus or minus 1.9, LWE with 30.8%, conjunctival relaxation with 29.3%, SLK with 15.7%, Meibomian Gland abnormalities 80.8%. |
| Other related information | To investigate treatment satisfaction of dry eye |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000034300 |