Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000029982 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000034244 |
Scientific Title | A Retrospective Study of Safety and Efficacy for Re-treatment of Brentuximab-Vedotin (BV) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL)/ systemic Anaplastic Large-cell Lymphoma (sALCL) |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/11/15 |
Last modified on | 2019/09/02 19:15:29 |
A Retrospective Study of Safety and Efficacy for Re-treatment of Brentuximab-Vedotin (BV) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL)/ systemic Anaplastic Large-cell Lymphoma (sALCL)
A Retrospective Study of Safety and Efficacy for Re-treatment of Brentuximab-Vedotin (BV) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL)/ systemic Anaplastic Large-cell Lymphoma (sALCL)
A Retrospective Study of Safety and Efficacy for Re-treatment of Brentuximab-Vedotin (BV) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL)/ systemic Anaplastic Large-cell Lymphoma (sALCL)
A Retrospective Study of Safety and Efficacy for Re-treatment of Brentuximab-Vedotin (BV) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL)/ systemic Anaplastic Large-cell Lymphoma (sALCL)
Japan |
CD30 positive cHL or sALCL
Hematology and clinical oncology |
Malignancy
NO
The purpose of this study is to confirm the efficacy and safety in Japanese population who are administered with brentuximab vedotin retreatment.
Safety,Efficacy
Exploratory
Pragmatic
Not applicable
Number of Participants who Experience at least one Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE), Overall response rate (ORR)
Complete response rate (CR rate), Progression-free survival (PFS), Duration of response (DOR), Time to treatment failure (TTF)
Observational
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
1. cHL or sALCL patients with CD30 positive
2. Patients who previously experienced a CR or PR with first brentuximab vedotin treatment and subsequently experienced disease progression or relapse were administered brentuximab vedotin retreatment*.
*Definition of brentuximab vedotin retreatment
1) Discontinued treatment of brentuximab vedotin as prior therapy after experienced a CR or PR.
2) At least single dose of brentuximab vedotin was administered after discontinued treatment of brentuximab vedotin and subsequently experienced disease progression or relapse.
3) Treatment of brentuximab vedotin after 6 weeks or more passed from the date of final dose of prior treatment of brentuximab vedotin.
4) Not the treatment of brentuximab vedotin as consolidation after SCT.
5) Monotherapy of retreatment of brentuximab vedotin (not concomitant use with other antitumor agent)
6) Re-retreatment (in the case that retreatment of brentuximab vedotin was administered after discontinued retreatment of brentuximab vedotin described above) is handled as a set of retreatment).
3. A patient who agreed with informed consent prior to the study enrollment.
1. Patients judged by the investigator or subinvestigator to be ineligible for enrollment in the study (such as patients who may be coerced to give consent)
20
1st name | Jumpei |
Middle name | |
Last name | Soeda |
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Strategic Medical Research Planning, Global Medical Affairs-Japan,
103-8668
12-10, Nihonbashi 2-chome, Chuo-ku,Tokyo 103-8668
03-3278-2111
C25016@sogo-medefi.jp
1st name | Takeda Study Registration Call Center |
Middle name | |
Last name | Takeda Study Registration Call Center |
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Strategic Medical Research Planning, Global Medical Affairs-Japan,
103-8668
12-10, Nihonbashi 2-chome, Chuo-ku,Tokyo 103-8668
03-3278-2111
C25016@sogo-medefi.jp
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Profit organization
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
12-10, Nihonbashi 2-chome, Chuo-ku,Tokyo 103-8668
03-3278-2111
C25016@sogo-medefi.jp
YES
JapicCTI-173771
Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center
2017 | Year | 11 | Month | 15 | Day |
https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2019.1654100
Published
https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2019.1654100
28
In this study, the efficacy was confirmed of retreatment with brentuximab vedotin in patients with cHL or sALCL who had achieved PR or CR with previous brentuximab vedotin therapy in Japan. AEs in patients with brentuximab vedotin retreatment did not include unexpected AEs and were generally manageable with dose modification or interruption.
2019 | Year | 09 | Month | 02 | Day |
2019 | Year | 08 | Month | 22 | Day |
The median ages of patients in safety population were 48.0 years (range, 18-86 years), including 17 males out of 28 (60.7%) and 11 females out of 28 (39.3%). The median Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m2)at the initiation of retreatment was 21.71 (range: 14.8-33.3).
Eighteen out of 28 (64.3%) patients were cHL and 10 out of 28 patients were sALCL. All the patients (28;100%) were CD30 positive at diagnosis for lymphoma by immunochemistry. For anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) status in sALCL patients, 3 out of 10 (30.0%) were positive and 6 out of 10 (70.0%) were negative, and 1 out of 10 was unknown. For Ann Arbor stage, 5 out of 28 (17.9%) were stage I, 5 out of 28 (17.9%) were stage II, 2 out of 28 (7.1%) were stage III and 14 out of 28 (50.0%) were stage IV, and 2 out of 28 (7.1%) were unknown. For B symptom, 18 out of 28 (34.3%) were without B symptom, 9 out of 28 (32.1%) were with B symptom, and 1 out of 28 (3.6%) was unknown. For Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status, 8 out of 28 (28.6%) were stage 0, 13 out of 28 (46.4%) were 1, 4 out of 28 (14.3%) were 3 and 1 out of 28 (3.6%) were unknown.
For disease status relative to most recent prior therapy, 8 out of 28 (28.6%) were refractory and 20 out of 28 (71.4%) were relapse after response.
A total of 28 subjects (cHL; 18, sALCL; 10) were enrolled and all subjects were included in the safety population. A total of 27 subjects (cHL; 17, sALCL; 10) with exception of one patient with cHL who was not assessed for response to treatment were included in the efficacy population.
TEAEs occurred in 18 of 28 (64.3%) in all patients, 11 of 18 (61.1%) in cHL and 7 of 10 (70.0%) in sALCL. Fourteen of 28 (50.0 %) patients experienced peripheral neuropathy (sensory; n=13, 46.4%, and motor; n=3, 10.7%) were most observed TEAEs. TEAEs observed in 2 out of 28 (7.1%) were neutropenia and AST increased, respectively. TEAEs observed in 1 out of 28 (3.6%) were ALT increased, upper respiratory infection, hepatic enzyme increased and fever, respectively.
For TEAE severity, grade 2 TEAEs were most observed in 12 out of 28 patients (42.9%). Thereafter, grade 1, 3 or 4 TEAEs were observed in 6 out of 28 patients (21.4%), 4 out of 28 patients (14.3%) , and 1 out of 28 patients (3.6%). Thus, grade 1 and 2 TEAEs were most observed.
TEAEs in grade 4 were neutropenia in 1 out of 28 (3.6%). TEAEs in grade 3 were peripheral motor neuropathy in 2 out of 28 (7.1%), neutropenia and ALT increased in 1 out of 28 (3.6%), respectively. Peripheral sensory neuropathy were most observed TEAEs in grade 2 (10 out of 28 (35.7%)). Other TEAEs in grade 2 were upper respiratory infection, ALT increased and AST increased (1 out of 28 (3.6%)), respectively. Peripheral neuropathy (sensory; n=3, 46.4%, and motor; n=1, 3.6%) were most observed TEAEs in grade 1 (4 out of 28 (14.3%)). Other TEAEs in grade 1 were fever and hepatic enzyme increased (1 out of 28 (3.6%)), respectively.Severe TEAEs were observed as peripheral motor neuropathy in 2 out of 28 patients (7.1%). TEAEs observed during brenzuximab retreatment did not include unexpected AEs. Additionally, TEAEs were almost recovered or resolved by with dose modification or interruption (including severe TEAEs). These results suggest that AEs during brenzuximab retreatment were manageable.
The ORRs for all patients with retreatment was 59.3% (95% CI: 38.8 - 77.6). The ORRs for patients with cHL and sALCL were 52.9% (95% CI: 27.8 - 77.0), and 70.0% (95% CI: 34.8-93.3), respectively.The median DOR for all patients, cHL and sALCL was 21.5 months (95% CI:2.6 - NA), 21.5 months (95% CI:3.2 - 21.5) and not reached (95% CI:2.6 - NA) , respectively. The CR rate for all patients, cHL and sALCL was 33.3% (95% CI:16.5-54.0), 7.6% (95% CI:3.8 - 43.4) and 60.0% (95% CI:26.2 - 87.8), , respectively. The median PFS for all patients, cHL and sALCL was 6.1 months (95% CI:3.3- NA), 5.3 months (95% CI:2.6-24.3) and not reached (95% CI:2.0-NA) , respectively. The median TTF for all patients, cHL and sALCL was 5.9 months (95% CI:3.3 - 12.4), 5.3 months (95% CI:2.6-12.4) and 6.1 months (95% CI:2.0-NA) , respectively.
Based on these results, the efficacy is showed in the patients with CD30 positive cHL or sALCL, who had previously achieved complete response (CR) or partial remission (PR) with prior brentuximab vedotin treatment, when who are administered brentuximab vedotin retreatment in Japan.
Completed
2017 | Year | 10 | Month | 17 | Day |
2019 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
2017 | Year | 12 | Month | 15 | Day |
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 25 | Day |
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 25 | Day |
2018 | Year | 08 | Month | 03 | Day |
2018 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
The purpose of this study is to confirm the efficacy and safety in Japanese population who are administered with brentuximab vedotin retreatment.
2017 | Year | 11 | Month | 15 | Day |
2019 | Year | 09 | Month | 02 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000034244