| Recruitment status | Main results already published |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000029564 |
| Receipt No. | R000033778 |
| Scientific Title | The efficacy of dydrogesterone and human menopausal gonadotropin protocol for ART |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/10/20 |
| Last modified on | 2019/04/18 (Ver. 3) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | The efficacy of dydrogesterone and human menopausal gonadotropin protocol for ART | |
| Acronym | Dydrogesteone new protocol | |
| Scientific Title | The efficacy of dydrogesterone and human menopausal gonadotropin protocol for ART | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Dydrogesteone new protocol | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | infertility | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To investigate the clinical efficacy of our new protocol using dydrogesterone with human menopausal gonadotropin for patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation in comparison with GnRHantagonist protocol. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Explanatory |
| Developmental phase | Phase III |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | The clinical pregnancy rate |
| Key secondary outcomes | The number of oocytes retrieved, the fertilization rate, the incidence of premature LH surge, the rate of viable embryos, the ongoing pregnancy rate |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Non-randomized |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | In the study group, patients were administered human menopausal gonadotropin and dydrogesterone per day from day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle onward, following ultrasound confirmation of the absence of oocytes larger than 10 mm. The initiating dose of 150 IU per day was used for patients with an AMH level over 3.0 ng per ml or a high antral follicle count greater than 15, otherwise 225 IU HMG was used. Follicular monitoring started on day 8 or 9 of the menstrual cycle. This monitoring was performed every 2 to 4 days using a transvaginal ultrasound examination to check the growing follicular size and the number of follicles.
|
|
| Interventions/Control_2 | In the control group, patients were administered human menopausal gonadotropin on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle. The choice of the first human menopausal gonadotropin dose was decided in the same manner as the study group. When either the leading follicle reached 14 mm or serum E2 levels exceeded 1000 pg per ml, a GnRH antagonist was administered every 24 hours to suppress premature LH surges following a flexible protocol.
The ultrasound examination and serum hormone level test were initiated on day 8 or 9 of the menstrual cycle, and the dose of HMG was adjusted according to follicular development. |
|
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Written informed consent is obtained from the patients who are enrolled. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age younger than 41 years, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels greater than 1.0 ng/ml, first or second time of IVF/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at our clinic. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | Patients who had endometriosis grade 3 or higher, documented cycles with no oocyte retrieved, and any contraindications to ovarian stimulation treatment. | |||
| Target sample size | 400 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Last name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Kamiya Ladies Clinic | ||||||
| Division name | Reproductive therapy | ||||||
| Zip code | |||||||
| Address | 2-1, Nishi2, Kita3, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0600003, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 011-231-2722 | ||||||
| kamiya@fine.ocn.ne.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| 1st name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Kamiya Ladies Clinic | ||||||
| Division name | Reproductive therapy | ||||||
| Zip code | |||||||
| Address | 2-1, Nishi2, Kita3, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0600003, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 011-231-2722 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| nanakoiwami@gmail.com | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Kamiya Ladies Clinic |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Kamiya Ladies Clinic |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | |
| Address | |
| Tel | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Partially published |
| Result | |
| URL related to results and publications | |
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | |
| Results | The subjects were 299 women undergoing COS for IVF/ICSI, between July 2016 and April 2017.No significant difference was found in the number of oocytes retrieved (control group: 10.74vs. study group: 10.87, p=0.5461) or viable embryo rate (control group: 68.1% vs. study group: 65.5%, p=0.2161) between the two groups. In the study group, During the follow-up period of FET, a total of 262 FET cycles were completed. At this time, there were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate (49.3% vs. 57.4%, p=0.1905), implantation rate (45.2% vs. 51.7%, p=0.3977), ongoing pregnancy rate (40.7% vs. 45.2%), and early pregnancy loss rate (17.4% vs. 20.0%, p=0.6933) between the control and study groups. |
| Results date posted | |
| Results Delayed | |
| Results Delay Reason | |
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |
| Baseline Characteristics | |
| Participant flow | |
| Adverse events | |
| Outcome measures | |
| Plan to share IPD | |
| IPD sharing Plan description | |
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Main results already published | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000033778 |