Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000029612 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000033757 |
Scientific Title | The prospective multicenter observational study of tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using the 25-gauge Franseen needle |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/10/18 |
Last modified on | 2020/03/20 11:54:57 |
The prospective multicenter observational study of tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using the 25-gauge Franseen needle
The prospective multicenter observational study of tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using the 25-gauge Franseen needle
The prospective multicenter observational study of tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using the 25-gauge Franseen needle
The prospective multicenter observational study of tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using the 25-gauge Franseen needle
Japan |
Lesions with Indication for EUS-FNA
Hepato-biliary-pancreatic medicine |
Malignancy
NO
To evaluate the efficacy of EUS-FNA using the 25-gauge Franseen needle in pathological diagnosis
Efficacy
Exploratory
Pragmatic
Not applicable
The tissue acquisition rate in the initial puncture
(1) Quality of a tissue sample
(2) Diagnostic accuracy
Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV in (3) pathological and (4) cytological malignancy or benignancy
(5) Success rate of puncture
(6) Adverse event rate in EUS-FNA
Observational
20 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
(1) Age =or >20
(2) Requirement of EUS-FNA of a solid lesion
(3) Use of the 25-gauge Franseen needle
(4) Providing written informed consent
(1) Cystic lesion
(2) PT-INR =or >1.5
(3) Platelate count < 50000/m3
(4) ASA =or >3
(5) ECOG-PS=4
(6) Pregnancy
(7) Unsuitable for inclusion at the discretion of the physician.
100
1st name | Masaki |
Middle name | |
Last name | Kuwatani |
Hokkaido University Hospital
Division of Endoscopy
060-8648
North 14, West 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo
011-716-1161
mkuwatan@med.hokudai.ac.jp
1st name | Ryo |
Middle name | |
Last name | Sugiura |
Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
060-8638
North 15, West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo
011-716-1161
rsugiura-hok@umin.ac.jp
Hokkaido University Hospital
None
Self funding
Institutional Review Board of Hokkaido University Hospital
North 14, West 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo
011-706-7636
crjimu@huhp.hokudai.ac.jp
NO
2017 | Year | 10 | Month | 18 | Day |
http://www.eusjournal.com/preprintarticle.asp?id=254011
Published
http://www.eusjournal.com/preprintarticle.asp?id=254011
100
The patients were 57 males and 43 females with a median age of 70 years. The technical success rate was 100 %. The tissue acquisition rate at the first pass was 95.0 % and the acquisition rate of an adequate specimen for histological assessment was 82.0 %. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 87.0 %, 100 %, 100 %, 40.0 % and 88.0 %, respectively. The adverse event rate was 1.0 %, the detail of which was 1 moderate pancreatic fistula.
2019 | Year | 05 | Month | 03 | Day |
Patients with a solid lesion who required EUS-FNB for a diagnosis.
Patients with a solid lesion who required EUS-FNB for a diagnosis were registered. All patients provided written informed consent.
There was 1 adverse event in 1 patient (1.0 %), who underwent transgastric puncture.
The primary outcome of the current study was a tissue acquisition rate in the initial pass. The secondary outcomes were an acquisition rate of an adequate specimen for histological assessment, quality of the tissue sample, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB, success rate of puncture, and adverse event rate.
Completed
2017 | Year | 08 | Month | 18 | Day |
2017 | Year | 08 | Month | 31 | Day |
2017 | Year | 08 | Month | 31 | Day |
2018 | Year | 04 | Month | 02 | Day |
1) Patient characteristics: age, gender, Performance status, commorbidity
2) Evaluation of the tumor: imaging (abdominal roentgenogram, CT, MRI, US, EUS)
3) Pathological findings of EUS-FNA specimen (diagnosis, sample quantity, sample quality, blood amount)
4) Procedure characteristics of EUS-FNA (target, puncture site, success rate, number of puncture, procedure time, with or without rapid on-site evaluation)
5) Adverse events of EUS-FNA
6) Hematological findings: WBC, Hb, Plt, blood fraction
7) Chemistry: ALP, total billirubin, Alb, AST, ALT, gamma-GT, total protein, LDH, creatinine, BUN, amylase, lipase, CRP
8) Coagulation: PT activity(%), PT-INR
9) Pathological findings of surgical specimen or biopsy specimen by ERCP
2017 | Year | 10 | Month | 18 | Day |
2020 | Year | 03 | Month | 20 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000033757