| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000029537 |
| Receipt No. | R000033748 |
| Scientific Title | Efficacy and safety of Targretin capsule 75-mg alone or in combination with phototherapy in Japanese patients with Cutaneous T-cell Lymphomas |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/10/16 |
| Last modified on | 2021/05/10 (Ver. 10) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Efficacy and safety of Targretin capsule 75-mg alone or in combination with phototherapy in Japanese patients with Cutaneous T-cell Lymphomas | |
| Acronym | Efficacy and safety of bexarotene or bexarotene plus phototherapy in CTCL | |
| Scientific Title | Efficacy and safety of Targretin capsule 75-mg alone or in combination with phototherapy in Japanese patients with Cutaneous T-cell Lymphomas | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Efficacy and safety of bexarotene or bexarotene plus phototherapy in CTCL | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To assess the efficacy and safety of bexarotene alone or bexarotene plus phototherapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | The primary efficacy endopoints evaluated though the 8 weeks of treatment were follows: Modified Severity-weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT), Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) |
| Key secondary outcomes | Efficacy: time to cutaneous tumor response, time to cutaneous tumor progression, amount of irradiation and UV dose, amount of bexarotene, capsules, and compliance rate, LDH, sIL-2R, TARC, T-cell receptor repertoire analysis
Safety: adverse events, hematology, blood chemistry |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | YES |
| Dynamic allocation | YES |
| Institution consideration | Institution is considered as adjustment factor in dynamic allocation. |
| Blocking | NO |
| Concealment | Central registration |
| Intervention | |||
| No. of arms | 2 | ||
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | ||
| Type of intervention |
|
||
| Interventions/Control_1 | Patients are p.o. administrated a 300 mg/m2 dose of bexarotene once daily for 8 weeks. | ||
| Interventions/Control_2 | Patients are p.o. administrated a 300 mg/m2 dose of bexarotene once daily for 8 weeks.
Patients are treated with psoralen baths preceding treatment with UVA radiation 5 times weekly. The initial dose of UVA was 0.5 J/cm2, dose increment of 0.5 J/cm2 each radiation. The maximum dose was 4.0 J/cm2. The initial dose of narrowband UVB administered is 50-70% of the MPD or 0.5-0.7 J/cm2. The dose of NB-UVB for the subsequent NB-UVB sessions is elevated 20% increments with each successive treatment session. The maximum dose is 2.0 J/cm2. |
||
| Interventions/Control_3 | |||
| Interventions/Control_4 | |||
| Interventions/Control_5 | |||
| Interventions/Control_6 | |||
| Interventions/Control_7 | |||
| Interventions/Control_8 | |||
| Interventions/Control_9 | |||
| Interventions/Control_10 | |||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Subjects must have met all of the following inclusion criteria:
1. A clinical diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas confirmed by biopsy to be histologically consistent with CTCL diagnosis by dermatopathologist 2. Age >= 20, written approval of patient |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Contraindications (severe liver failure, known hypersensitivity to bexarotene, systemic therapy with vitamin A or oral retinoid therapy at the entry in this study, hypervitaminosis A)
2. Patients with pregnancy, breast-feeding or intent to become pregnant 3. Skin-directed therapies, local chemotherapy, topical steroids, etc. within 2 weeks of study entry. Low- and mid-potency topical corticosteroids were allowed only for subjects using a stable dose regimen at least 2 weeks prior to study entry. High potency topical corticosteroids were not allowed permitted. 4. Prior therapy for the treatment of CTCL: therapy with UVA or UBV within 3 weeks of study entry 5. Prior therapy for the treatment of CTCL: radiotherapy within 4 weeks of study entry 6. Prior therapy for the treatment of CTCL: therapy with bexarotene within4 weeks of study entry 7. Known allergic reaction or hypersensitivity to bexarotene or other component of Targretin capsules 8. History of severe allergic reaction or hypersensitivity to any other drugs or prior therapy for the treatment of CTCL 9. Unwillingness or inability to minimize exposure to sunlight and antificial UV light while receiving bexarotene 10. Principal investigator or subinvestigator judged inadequate |
|||
| Target sample size | 60 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences | ||||||
| Division name | Department of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology | ||||||
| Zip code | 4678601 | ||||||
| Address | 1-Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi | ||||||
| TEL | 052-853-8261 | ||||||
| amorita@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences | ||||||
| Division name | Department of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology | ||||||
| Zip code | 4678601 | ||||||
| Address | 1-Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi | ||||||
| TEL | 052-853-8261 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| amorita@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
Department of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Minophagen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Profit organization |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences and Nagoya City University Hospital Institutional Review Board |
| Address | 1-Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi |
| Tel | 0528587215 |
| clinical_research@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 名古屋市立大学,大阪市立大学 |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | https://jrct.niph.go.jp/search?page=1 |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://jrct.niph.go.jp/search?page=1 | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 53 | ||||||
| Results | We conducted the comparative study on the efficacy and safety between the Targretin monotherapy and the Targretin/phototherapy combination therapy for CTCL. In the efficacy, no difference was observed in the therapeutic effect of the two therapies evaluated by mSWAT and PGA at 8 weeks, but the two therapies have been shown to have therapeutic effects. In the combination therapy, 4 subjects were diagnosed to be the complete response, and it was suggested that the combination therapy may have a high effect. | ||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | A total of 46 subjects (29 males and 17 females) were enrolled, and 7 subjects were excluded. Twenty-four subjects (15 males and 9 females) and 22 subjects (14 males and 8 females) were assigned to the Targretin monotherapy group and the Targretin + phototherapy combination therapy group, respectively. The mean age was 69.3 years. The mean duration of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) was 2.06 years. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of CTCL type or any other baseline characteristics. | ||||||
| Participant flow | Registration period: between September 2017 and September 2019
Number of patients enrolled: November 2017; 1, December 2017; 4, January 2018; 1, February 2018; 4, April 2018; 2, May 2018; 2, June 2018; 1, July 2018; 3, August 2018; 2, September 2018; 1, October 2018; 4, November 2018; 3, January 2019; 1, February 2019; 1, March 2019; 2, May 2019; 1, June 2019; 1, July 2019; 4, August 2019; 4, September 2019; 4 |
||||||
| Adverse events | The adverse events (AEs) that were reported during the research treatment and follow-up period of this study were 120 cases in 24 subjects of the Targretin monotherapy group and 111 cases in 22 subjects of the Targretin + phototherapy combination therapy group, respectively. Of the AEs, 5 serious adverse events were reported in 5 subjects, respectively (hypertriglyceridemia, type 2 diabetes, acute cholecystitis, rhabdomyolysis and interstitial lung disease). In addition, adverse drug reaction were also reported in 87 cases in 24 subjects of the Targretin monotherapy group and 77 cases in 22 subjects of the Targretin + phototherapy combination therapy group, respectively. The serious adverse drug reactions were reported in 3 cases in 3 subjects, respectively (hypertriglyceridemia, rhabdomyolysis and interstitial lung disease). | ||||||
| Outcome measures | No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the response rate by mSWAT evaluation or any the PGA evaluation after 8 weeks, which are the primary endpoints of this study. No difference was observed between the groups regarding the time to response period based on the mSWAT evaluation, which was a secondary endpoint. In both the groups, mSWAT scores were decreased over time until the time of evaluation at 8 weeks, indicating a therapeutic effect on CTCL. In the mSWAT evaluation, the rate of the decreases from baseline at 8 weeks tended to be greater in the Targretin + phototherapy combination therapy group. There was a difference in the rate of change in mSWAT between the research institutions. In Nagoya City University Hospital, the decrease from baseline was observed in both the groups. However, in Osaka City University Hospital, but the decrease was not observed in any of the groups. | ||||||
| Plan to share IPD | none | ||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | none | ||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000033748 |