Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000029382 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000033579 |
Scientific Title | Assessment of Primary Prevention Patients Receiving An ICD - Systematic Evaluation of ATP (APPRAISE-ATP) |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/11/01 |
Last modified on | 2024/10/24 08:08:20 |
Assessment of Primary Prevention Patients Receiving An ICD - Systematic Evaluation of ATP
(APPRAISE-ATP)
Assessment of Primary Prevention Patients Receiving An ICD - Systematic Evaluation of ATP
(APPRAISE-ATP)
Assessment of Primary Prevention Patients Receiving An ICD - Systematic Evaluation of ATP
(APPRAISE-ATP)
Assessment of Primary Prevention Patients Receiving An ICD - Systematic Evaluation of ATP
(APPRAISE-ATP)
Japan | Asia(except Japan) | North America |
Europe |
Ventricular Tachycardia, Ventricular Fibrillation
Cardiology |
Others
NO
The primary objective is to understand the role of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in primary prevention patients indicated for ICD therapy. The incidence of all-cause shocks in subjects programmed with shocks only will be compared with subjects programmed to standard therapy (ATP and shock) to assess equivalency.
Others
The incidence of all-cause shocks in subjects programmed with shocks only will be compared with subjects programmed to standard therapy (ATP and shock) to assess equivalency.
Time-to-First All-Cause Shock
Time-to-First All-Cause Shock or Death from Any Cause
Time-to-Death from Any Cause
Time-to-First Appropriate Shock
Time-to-First Inappropriate Shock
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Single blind -participants are blinded
Active
2
Treatment
Other |
1:1 randomization will occur in the electronic data capture (EDC) system. Subjects will be randomized to ATP and shock
1:1 randomization will occur in the electronic data capture (EDC) system. Subjects will be randomized to shock only
20 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
Subject with a Boston Scientific transvenous ICD (de novo implant or upgrade from pacemaker to ICD ) implanted because of one of the following:
Prior MI and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than or equal to (< or)30% OR
Ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, and LVEF < or 35% , and NYHA class II or III
Subject is age 21or above, or is considered of legal age per given geography
Subject is willing and capable of providing informed consent
Subject is willing and capable of complying with follow-up visits as defined by this protocol
History of spontaneous sustained VT (> or 160 bpm at > or 30 seconds in duration) or VF not due to a reversible cause
NYHA Class IV documented in the medical records within 90 calendar days prior to enrollment
Subject is eligible and scheduled for cardiac resynchronization (CRT) implant
Subjects with a previous subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD)
Subject with existing TV-ICD device implanted for greater than 60 days
Subjects with coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention within the past 90 calendar days prior to enrollment
Subjects with documented myocardial infarction within the past 90 calendar days prior to enrollment
Subjects on the active heart transplant list
Subject who has a VAD or is to receive VAD
Life expectancy shorter than 18 months due to any medical condition (e.g., cancer, uremia, liver failure, etc...)
Subjects currently requiring hemodialysis
Subject who is known to pregnant or plans to become pregnant over the course of the trial
Subject is enrolled in any other concurrent clinical study, with the exception of local mandatory governmental registries and observational studies/registries, without the written approval from Boston Scientific
2600
1st name | Claudio |
Middle name | |
Last name | Schuger, MD |
Henry Ford Health System
Cardiac Electrophysiology
48202
2799 W Grand Blvd, M322 Detroit, MI
+1-313-916-2417
cschuge1@hfhs.org
1st name | Tina |
Middle name | |
Last name | Cordaro |
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cardiac Rhythm Management
01752-1234
300 Boston Scientific Way Marlborough, MA
+1-585-330-6218
tina.cordaro@bsci.com
Boston Scientific Corporation
Boston Scientific Corporation
Profit organization
Henry Ford Health System
Henry Ford Health System Research Administration 1 Ford Place -2F Detroit, MI 48202-2689
+1-313-874-4464
NA
YES
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02923726
ClinicalTrials.gov
2017 | Year | 11 | Month | 01 | Day |
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2824425
Published
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2824425
2626
The use of a single burst of ATP prior to shock in primary prevention ICD recipients with modern ICD detection programming prolonged the time to first all-cause ICD shock.
2024 | Year | 10 | Month | 24 | Day |
2024 | Year | 10 | Month | 03 | Day |
A total of 2595 patients were randomized (mean age, 63.9 years; 22.4%were females).
The main clinical characteristics at baseline were similar in both groups.
Between September 2016 and April 2021, a total of 2626 patients were enrolled at 134 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia. Of these patients, 2595 patients underwent randomization. 1302 were randomized to the ATP plus shock group and 1293 were randomized to the shock only group. The main clinical characteristics at baseline were similar in both groups. The median follow-up was 38 months in the ATP plus shock group and 41 months in the shock only group. The annual withdrawal rate was 7.5%. A total of 644 patients were withdrawn before completion of the study. Of these patients, 73 withdrew from the study after reaching the primary end point. There was no significant difference in withdrawals between randomization groups. The annual withdrawal rate differed by 1.1% from pre- to post-COVID-19 periods (before and after January 31, 2020, 6.7% vs 7.8%). A withdrawal sensitivity analysis indicated minimal expected impact on the primary end point.
All adverse events and serious adverse events were reported.
A total of 2595 patients were randomized (mean age, 63.9 years; 22.4%were females). At a mean follow-up of 38 months, first all-cause shock occurred in 129 participants in the ATP plus shock group and 178 participants in the shock only group. The hazard ratio
(HR) for the primary end point was 0.72 (95.9%CI, 0.57-0.92), with P = .005 for superiority of the ATP plus shock group over the shock only group. During follow-up in an intention-to-treat analysis, the total shock burden per 100 patient-years was not statistically
different, at 12.3 and 14.9, respectively (P = .70).
Completed
2016 | Year | 08 | Month | 02 | Day |
2017 | Year | 02 | Month | 02 | Day |
2016 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
2023 | Year | 07 | Month | 06 | Day |
2017 | Year | 10 | Month | 02 | Day |
2024 | Year | 10 | Month | 24 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000033579