UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Basic information
Official scientific title of the study	Muscle activity of shoulder and scapular surrounding muscles during various push-up plus
Title of the study (Brief title)	Muscle activity of shoulder and scapular surrounding muscles during various push-up plus
Region	Japan

Condition
Condition	Healthy adult male
Classification by specialty	Not applicable Adult
Classification by malignancy	Others
Genomic information	NO

Objectives
Narrative objectives1	In this study, we will clarify the muscle activity of shoulder and scapular surrounding muscles during Push up-plus (PUP), elbow PUP, and knee PUP at subject's shoulder width and narrow than shoulder width 30% hand positions.
Basic objectives2	Others
Basic objectives -Others	To consider an appropriate method of Push-up plus.
Trial characteristics_1
Trial characteristics_2
Developmental phase

Assessment
Primary outcomes	The muscle activity of shoulder and scapular surrounding muscles during push-up plus.
Key secondary outcomes

Base
Study type	Interventional

Study design
Basic design	Single arm
Randomization	Non-randomized
Randomization unit
Blinding	Open -no one is blinded
Control	Historical
Stratification
Dynamic allocation
Institution consideration
Blocking
Concealment

Intervention
No. of arms	1
Purpose of intervention	Treatment
Type of intervention	Other
Interventions/Control_1	Electrode of electromyography on right side Push-up Plus postures are standard PUP, elbow PUP, and knee PUP. Hand positions are each subject shoulder width and narrow than shoulder width 30%. Measurement time is about an hour 30 minutes on per person.
Interventions/Control_2
Interventions/Control_3
Interventions/Control_4
Interventions/Control_5
Interventions/Control_6
Interventions/Control_7
Interventions/Control_8
Interventions/Control_9
Interventions/Control_10

Eligibility
Age-lower limit	20 years-old <=
Age-upper limit	30 years-old >=
Gender	Male
Key inclusion criteria	Healthy adult male (20-30 years old) Participants don not have any orthopaedic and neurological disease on shoulder, neck and lower back.
Key exclusion criteria	Inclusion criteria for participants not satisfy Participants were not consent
Target sample size	12

Research contact person
Name of lead principal investigator	Sakamoto Masaaki
Organization	Department of Rehabilitation Sciences Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma University
Division name	professor
Address	3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma
TEL	027-220-8972
Email	msaka@gunma-u.ac.jp

Public contact
Name of contact person	Batbayar Yanjinsuren
Organization	Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma university
Division name	Master course
Address	2-16-10 Kamikoide-machi,, Maebashi, Gunma
TEL	080-5696-6257
Homepage URL
Email	h161c026@gunma-u.ac.jp

Sponsor
Institute	Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma University
Institute
Department

Funding Source
Organization	None
Organization
Division
Category of Funding Organization	Self funding
Nationality of Funding Organization

Other related organizations
Co-sponsor
Name of secondary funｄer(s)

Secondary IDs
Secondary IDs	NO
Study ID_1
Org. issuing International ID_1
Study ID_2
Org. issuing International ID_2
IND to MHLW

Institutions
Institutions

Other administrative information
Date of disclosure of the study information	2017 Year 09 Month 01 Day

Progress
Recruitment status	Completed
Date of protocol fixation	2017 Year 09 Month 01 Day
Anticipated trial start date	2017 Year 10 Month 01 Day
Last follow-up date	2017 Year 10 Month 31 Day
Date of closure to data entry	2017 Year 11 Month 02 Day
Date trial data considered complete	2017 Year 11 Month 05 Day
Date analysis concluded	2017 Year 11 Month 20 Day

Related information
URL releasing protocol
Publication of results	Unpublished
URL releasing results
Results	In the result of Muscle activity comparison by the posture, in the EPUP posture, the SA muscle activity and PM/SA muscle activity ratio was significantly increased. In the SPUP posture, the SA muscle activity was greater than KPUP posture. On the other hand, PM muscle activity was significantly smaller than EPUP posture. Meanwhile, AD muscle activity was significantly increased than KPUP posture. In the KPUP posture, the SA muscle activity was significantly smaller than other 2 postures. Finding of this study we suggest that PUP exercise beginning with KPUP posture progressing to the SPUP posture, finally the EPUP posture with SW hand position. This progression may assist the particular activation of SA muscle without compensatory activation of PM muscle for patients with shoulder disorder in rehabilitation by gradually.
Other related information

Management information
Registered date	2017 Year 09 Month 01 Day
Last modified on	2018 Year 09 Month 04 Day

Link to view the page
URL(English)	https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000033143