Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000028042 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000032108 |
Scientific Title | Effects of gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) on the subjects with chronic stroke |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/09/01 |
Last modified on | 2020/11/23 15:24:11 |
Effects of gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) on the subjects with chronic stroke
Effects of gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) on the subjects with chronic stroke
Effects of gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) on the subjects with chronic stroke
Effects of gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) on the subjects with chronic stroke
Japan |
Subjects with chronic stroke
Rehabilitation medicine |
Others
NO
To examine the effects of gait exercise assist robot on the subjects with chronic stroke.
Efficacy
Physical Cost Index and gait analysis
10m gait velocity
6-minute walk distance
Timed up to Go
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
NO
Numbered container method
2
Treatment
Device,equipment | Maneuver |
Subjects receives gait training using gait exercise assist robot for 40 min per session, 5 days per week for 4 weeks.
Subjects receives gait training on treadmil for 40 min per session, 5 days per week for 4 weeks.
20 | years-old | <= |
80 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
1.>6 months duration after stroke
2.Hemiparesis of unilateral, supratentorial, ischemic, or hemorrhage stroke
3.Independent in ground ambulation with or without the use of a unilateral assistive device (standard cane, four-pronged cane) and with or without the use of a an ankle foot orthoses.
4.Independent in treadmil gait training
5.Approval for study participation
1.Cannot obey instructions of a healer
2.Significant cardiorespiratory/metabolic disease, or orthopedic injury or other neurological
3.Excessive spasticity (defined as Ashworth scale of greater than 3 at any lower limb joint)
4.Size limitations for the harness/counterweight system or robotic orthosis
5.No botulinum toxin therapy in the lower limbs < 4 months prior to enrollment
28
1st name | Kazuhisa |
Middle name | |
Last name | Domen |
Hyogo college of Medicine
Department of rehabilitation medicine
663-8501
1-1 Mukogawacho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501, Japan
0798-45-6881
domen@hyo-med.ac.jp
1st name | Tomoyuki |
Middle name | |
Last name | Ogino |
Hyogo college of medicine Sasayama medical center
Department of rehabilitation
669-2321
5 Kurooka, Sasayama, Hyogo 669-2321, Japan
079-552-1181
sirokuro@hyo-med.ac.jp
Hyogo college of Medicine
Self funding
Self funding
TOYOTA motor corporation
Hyogo college of Medicine
1-1 Mukogawacho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501, Japan
0798-45-6066
rinken@hyo-med.ac.jp
NO
兵庫医科大学ささやま医療センター(兵庫県)/Hyogo college of medicine Sasayama medical center (Hyogo)
2017 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305720302858?via%3Dihub
Published
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305720302858?via%3Dihub
20
Gait speed was significantly increased at after the intervention and 1-month follow-up compared with before the intervention in the GEAR group. Also, mean changes in TUG and 6-min walk were significantly greater in the GEAR group than in the treadmill group when comparing before with after the intervention.The GRC scale scores were significantly higher after the intervention, at a 1-month and 3-month follow-up assessment than that before the intervention in the GEAR group.
2020 | Year | 11 | Month | 23 | Day |
GEAR group (n=8, Age: 66.1 (9.6) years, Sex: male 6, female 2, Side of paresis: left 4, right 4, Type of stroke: infarction 1, hemorrhage 7, Time after stroke: 8.0 (5.1) years, Stroke Impairment Assessment Set total lower limb motor score: 8.8 (2.5) scores, Ankle foot orthosis: 8, Assistive device: 6, Mini Mental State Examination: 28.5 (1.9) scores). Treadmill group (n=11, Age: 65.0 (7.7) years, Sex: male 9, female 2, Side of paresis: left 3, right 8, Type of stroke: infarction 4, hemorrhage 7, Time after stroke: 7.1 (4.1) years, Stroke Impairment Assessment Set total lower limb motor score: 8.1 (2.6) scores, Ankle foot orthosis: 7, Assistive device:9, Mini Mental State Examination: 28.5 (1.3) scores).
During the intervention period, one subject was dropped from the GEAR group after the intervention for personal reasons. Additionally, one subject in the GEAR group experienced uncontrolled arrhythmia between the 1-month and 3-month follow-up visits.
No adverse effects were identified for both GEAR and Treadmill intervention.
All outcome measures were assessed before and after the intervention, at 1-month, and 3-month follow-up assessment. Outcome measures included 10-m walk test (gait parameters), Timed Up and Go (TUG)test, 6-min walk test and Global Rating ofChange (GRC) scales.
Completed
2017 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
2017 | Year | 08 | Month | 25 | Day |
2017 | Year | 09 | Month | 11 | Day |
2019 | Year | 03 | Month | 20 | Day |
2017 | Year | 07 | Month | 03 | Day |
2020 | Year | 11 | Month | 23 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000032108