Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000027820 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000031875 |
Scientific Title | Comparison of airway management by using LMA Protector with that of LMA Supreme in the clinical situation |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/06/20 |
Last modified on | 2022/08/05 08:53:23 |
Comparison of airway management by using LMA Protector with that of LMA Supreme in the clinical situation
Comparison of airway management by using LMA Protector with that of LMA Supreme in the clinical situation
Comparison of airway management by using LMA Protector with that of LMA Supreme in the clinical situation
Comparison of airway management by using LMA Protector with that of LMA Supreme in the clinical situation
Japan |
Patients who will be planned to the operation
Anesthesiology | Operative medicine |
Others
NO
We will compare of usefulness of the airway management by using new device LMA Protector with that of LMA Supreme
Safety,Efficacy
with or without of postoperative throat, Numerical Rating Score (NRS)
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Single blind -participants are blinded
Active
2
Treatment
Device,equipment |
The Group which using LMA Protector
The Group which using LMA Supreme
20 | years-old | <= |
80 | years-old | > |
Male and Female
The patients who will be planned to the operations
The patients with trauma, ileum, abdominal cavity inflammation, peristalsis dysfunction, gatroesophageal reflux, severe obesity (> BMI 35), difficult mutual understanding, failed to agree with this study
60
1st name | Mitsutaka |
Middle name | |
Last name | Edanaga |
Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine
Department of Anesthesiology
0608543
S1, W16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
011-611-2111
edanaka@sapmed.ac.jp
1st name | Kouji |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hamaya |
Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine
Hospital section
060-8543
S1, W16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
011-611-2111
ko-hamaya-923@sapmed.ac.jp
Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine
Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine
Self funding
Hospital sections, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine
S1, W16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
011-611-2111
ko-hamaya-923@sapmed.ac.jp
NO
2017 | Year | 06 | Month | 20 | Day |
https://web.sapmed.ac.jp/masui/patients/research/pdf/292-013.pdf
Unpublished
https://web.sapmed.ac.jp/masui/patients/research/pdf/292-013.pdf
60
The NRS score of LMA Protector was statistically significantly lower than that of LMA Supreme.
2022 | Year | 08 | Month | 05 | Day |
There were no significant differences in patients characteristics between the two groups.
A total of 64 patients were enrolled and randomized into LMA Protector or LMA Supreme groups. Four patients were excluded due to changes in the surgical technique and position. Hence, a total of 60 patients were enrolled and randomized into LMA Protector and LMA Supreme groups. After excluding two patients in each group due to insertion difficulties, 28 participants each were allocated to the LMA Protector and LMA Supreme groups, all of whom were successfully followed-up and their outcomes analyzed.
No adverse events occurred.
OPLP of LMA Protector was significantly higher than that of LMA Supreme (P = .0047).LMA Protector provided a better view of the tip position compared with LMA Supreme (P = .0041). Time to insertion was longer with LMA Protector than LMA Supreme (P = .0006). There were no significant differences in the number of attempts until successful insertion (P = 0.223) and initial cuff pressure (P = 0.495).
Completed
2017 | Year | 05 | Month | 11 | Day |
2017 | Year | 05 | Month | 11 | Day |
2017 | Year | 06 | Month | 21 | Day |
2020 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
2017 | Year | 06 | Month | 19 | Day |
2022 | Year | 08 | Month | 05 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000031875