| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000027615 |
| Receipt No. | R000031476 |
| Scientific Title | Study of the inter-rater reliability of two triage tools by Japan Triage and Acuity Scale(JTAS) and Emergency Severity Index (ESI) : A randomized trial. |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/06/22 |
| Last modified on | 2020/06/02 (Ver. 15) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Study of the inter-rater reliability of two triage tools by Japan Triage and Acuity Scale(JTAS) and Emergency Severity Index (ESI) : A randomized trial. | |
| Acronym | Study of the inter-rater reliability of two triage tools by Japan Triage and Acuity Scale(JTAS) and Emergency Severity Index (ESI) : A randomized trial. | |
| Scientific Title | Study of the inter-rater reliability of two triage tools by Japan Triage and Acuity Scale(JTAS) and Emergency Severity Index (ESI) : A randomized trial. | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Study of the inter-rater reliability of two triage tools by Japan Triage and Acuity Scale(JTAS) and Emergency Severity Index (ESI) : A randomized trial. | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||||
| Condition | Subjects will be recruited the triage nurses using the JTAS in emergency department. This study will divide subjects into two groups. | |||
| Classification by specialty |
|
|||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |||
| Genomic information | NO | |||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of acuity decision between the ESI and the JTAS, and to clarify whether the ESI can be applied to the emergency department in Japan. |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Explanatory |
| Developmental phase | Phase II,III |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | The primary endpoint will establish the inter-rater reliability of the results on practice cases in each group. In addition, the secondary endpoint will establish the inter-rater reliability of the results on practice cases in each urgency criteria. |
| Key secondary outcomes | At first, the Visual Analog Scale which can be indicator of subjective evaluation will be employed to measure usability of each triage tool. Secondary, the total time taken to solve practice cases is related between the ESI and the JTAS. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Single blind -participants are blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | YES |
| Dynamic allocation | NO |
| Institution consideration | Institution is considered as adjustment factor in dynamic allocation. |
| Blocking | YES |
| Concealment | Pseudo-randomization |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | After completion of training with the ESI for 3 hours, subjects in each group will solve 100 practice cases. | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | After completion of review with the JTAS for 3 hours, subjects in each group solved 100 practice cases. | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Subjects have experienced in triage for 2 years or more and less than 5 years, have experienced in nurse for 5 years or more and less than 20 years. Moreover, subjects had participated in the triage seminar. Also subjects have used triage tool with the JTAS on a daily basis. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | The exception criteria were as follows; except certified nurse specialist of critical care nursing and Japanese nurse practitioner.Subjects do not have chance of acuity decision on a daily basis. | |||
| Target sample size | 50 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Kansai University of Social Welfare | ||||||
| Division name | Faculty of Nursing | ||||||
| Zip code | 678-0255 | ||||||
| Address | 380-3 Sinden, Ako, Hyogo | ||||||
| TEL | 0791-46-2686 | ||||||
| takaoka@kusw.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Kansai University of Social Welfare | ||||||
| Division name | Faculty of Nursing | ||||||
| Zip code | 678-0255 | ||||||
| Address | 380-3 Sinden, Ako, Hyogo | ||||||
| TEL | 0791-46-2686 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| takaoka@kusw.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Department of nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Kansai University of Social Welfare. |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Japan Society of Private Colleges and Universities of Nursing |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Research ethics committee of Kansai University of Social Welfare |
| Address | 380-3 Sinden, Ako, Hyogo |
| Tel | 0791-46-2525 |
| kusw-kango@kusw.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsem/22/6/22_753/_pdf/-char/ja |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsem/22/6/22_753/_pdf/-char/ja | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 18 | ||||||
| Results | A quadratically weighted kappa was used tomeasure inter-observer reliability; the ESI was superior to the JTAS in concordance rate(0.82 and 0.74, respectively). For all rating categories, except level 5, the Fleiss' Kappa was higher in the ESI group. The ESI was more sensitive for category level 2, as an indication of high-risk situations, than the JTAS. |
||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results |
|
||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | Eighteen JTAS-trained triage nurses, from 3 Japanese EDs, were randomly assigned to the ESI group or JTAS group. Nurses independently assigned triage scores to 100 emergency cases. |
||||||
| Participant flow | Four indexes were used: accuracy, each urgency accuracy of rating individual category-stage, answer time, and a subjective usability. There were no significant differences in age, clinical experience, or JTAS experience between groups. |
||||||
| Adverse events | N/ A |
||||||
| Outcome measures | As a scale to evaluate the agreement between evaluators in the decision of emergency, we verified with the Kappa coefficient, which is an index of inter-evaluator reliability. |
||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000031476 |