| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000027385 |
| Receipt No. | R000031383 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Comparison of iNIBP, linear inflation non-invasive blood pressure measurement, and conventional deflation NIBP in detecting hypotension during Caesarean section |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/05/18 |
| Last modified on | 2018/04/29 (Ver. 2) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Comparison of iNIBP, linear inflation non-invasive blood pressure measurement, and conventional deflation NIBP in detecting hypotension during Caesarean section
|
|
| Title of the study (Brief title) | Comparion of iNIBP and dNIBP during Caesarean section | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||||
| Condition | Singleton planned caesarean section under the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) technique through a single puncture after 36 weeks gestation | |||
| Classification by specialty |
|
|||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |||
| Genomic information | NO | |||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To evaluate prospectively if iNIBP can detect maternal hypotension during caesarean section more quickly than dNIBP in the clinical setting.
|
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Pragmatic |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | The time to detect maternal hypotension after
beginning of anesthesia(second) |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| Base | |
| Study type | Observational |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Singleton planned caesarean section at single tertialy center under the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) technique through a single puncture after 36 weeks gestaion. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | Preterm delivery < 36 weeks gestation, Caesarean secton under general anesthesia | |||
| Target sample size | 100 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Shingo Irikoma |
| Organization | Seirei hamamatsu General Hospital |
| Division name | Depertment of Anesthesiology |
| Address | 12-2-2 Sumiyoshi, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka |
| TEL | 053-474-2222 |
| s.irikoma@gmail.com | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Shingo Irikoma |
| Organization | Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital |
| Division name | Depertment of Anesthesiology |
| Address | 12-2-2 Sumiyoshi, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka |
| TEL | 053-474-2222 |
| Homepage URL | |
| s.irikoma@gmail.com | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Nothing |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date | |||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Published |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | |
| Other related information | An iNIBP cuff was placed on the same arm as an intravenous line, and a dNIBP cuff was placed on the other arm. Because of left uterine displacement (about 10 degree) to prevent hypotension, we defined hypotension as systolic pressure of 107 mmHg or less on the left arm which is about 10 cm lower and pressure of 92 mmHg or less on the right arm which is about 10 cm higher. We examined which detect hypotension more quickly in the clinical setting. A two-tailed Z test was performed to statistically analyze the difference between iNIBP and dNIBP measurement results.
|
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000031383 |