| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000026639 |
| Receipt No. | R000030594 |
| Scientific Title | Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Zimmer Natural Nail System Cephalomedullary Asia Nail with Anterior Support Screw (ASS) versus Conventional Technique |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/03/23 |
| Last modified on | 2022/07/25 (Ver. 11) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Zimmer Natural Nail System Cephalomedullary Asia Nail with Anterior Support Screw (ASS) versus Conventional Technique | |
| Acronym | Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Zimmer Natural Nail System Cephalomedullary Asia Nail with Anterior Support Screw (ASS) versus Conventional Technique (ASS Study) | |
| Scientific Title | Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Zimmer Natural Nail System Cephalomedullary Asia Nail with Anterior Support Screw (ASS) versus Conventional Technique | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Zimmer Natural Nail System Cephalomedullary Asia Nail with Anterior Support Screw (ASS) versus Conventional Technique (ASS Study) | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Fracture type is classified as 3-partB or 4-part fracture in 3D-CT classification (Nakano), and combination with a subtype P in lateral classification (Ikuta) at preoperative CT assessment. | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To compare postoperative 2-3weeks fracture reduction maintenance rate between patients operated with ASS (investigational group) and patients operated without ASS (Control group) using same implant system (ZNN CM Asia, Zimmer Biomet). |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Pragmatic |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | The maintenance rate of postoperative 2-3 week reduction position. |
| Key secondary outcomes | The influence of surgery time / fracture type / postoperative reduction position / with or without ASS technique on CT evaluation. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | NO |
| Dynamic allocation | NO |
| Institution consideration | Institution is considered as a block. |
| Blocking | YES |
| Concealment | Numbered container method |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | At surgery, intervention group using ZNN CM Asia with ASS technique. | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | At surgery, conventional group using ZNN CM Asia without ASS technique. | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Fracture type is classified as 3-partB or 4-part fracture in 3D-CT classification (Nakano), and combination with a subtype P in lateral classification (Ikuta) at preoperative CT assessment.
2. Japanese Male or female 3. not less than 20 years of age 4. Primary closed intertrochanteric fracture of the femur |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patient who cannot take CT image within 3 days after surgery.
2. Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions. |
|||
| Target sample size | 240 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Kagawa Rosai Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Orthopaedic Surgery | ||||||
| Zip code | 763-8502 | ||||||
| Address | 3-1 Joto-cho 3-chome, Marugame, Kagawa, 763-8502 Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 0877-23-3111 | ||||||
| yukako.nishino@zimmerbiomet.com | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Zimmer Biomet G.K. | ||||||
| Division name | Clinical Affairs | ||||||
| Zip code | 105-0011 | ||||||
| Address | 11-1 Shibakoen 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0011, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 03-6402-6771 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| yukako.nishino@zimmerbiomet.com | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Zimmer Biomet G.K. |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Zimmer Biomet G.K. |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Profit organization |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | 1 |
| Address | 1 |
| Tel | 1 |
| 1 | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | YES |
| Study ID_1 | NCT03196193 |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Study ID_2 | jRCTs032180353 |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | jRCT (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials) |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 香川労災病院(香川県)、岡山赤十字病院(岡山県)、佐賀県医療センター好生館(佐賀県)、岡山ろうさい病院(岡山県)、済生会高岡病院(富山県)、公立豊岡病院(兵庫県)、春日井市民病院(愛知県)、済生会熊本病院(熊本県)、沼津市立病院(静岡県)、JCHO星ヶ丘医療センター(大阪府)、九州中央病院(福岡県)、呉共済病院(広島県)、新潟中央病院(新潟県)、川崎幸病院(神奈川県)、藤枝市立総合病院(静岡県) |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs032180353 |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs032180353 | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 240 | ||||||
| Results | This study showed that ASS technique can restrain the displacement of the proximal bone fragment to the intramedullary type and excessive sliding of lag screw which leads to postoperative complications such as re-dislodgement of bone fragment and cut-out, in the treatment of femoral trochanteric fractures without appropriate posterior bony support. | ||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | Japanese patients who injured closed, unstable femoral trochanteric fractures were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to ZNN CM Asia with ASS technique group (ASS(+) group) or without ASS technique group (ASS(-) group) preoperatively.
There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups (P >= 0.05). [Baseline Characteristics (ASS(+) group, ASS(-) group)] - Gender (M : F) 15 : 120, 22 : 97 - Age (y/o) 85.9 +/- 8.9, 86.7 +/- 7.9 - Height (cm) 148.9 +/- 8.8, 150.0 +/- 9.0 - Body Weight (kg) 45.3 +/- 9.8, 46.2 +/- 9.3 - BMI (kg/m2) 20.4 +/- 3.6, 20.6 +/- 3.2 |
||||||
| Participant flow | A total of 237 of enrolled 240 cases were included in the analysis for the primary endpoint.
[Change History of Number of Cases from IC to Statistics] - IC, Randomization 121, 119 - Follow-up Evaluation 120 (dropped 1 case*1), 119 - CT Image Analyses 118 (dropped 2 cases*2), 119 - Statistics 118, 119 *1 Revision surgery due to SAE (1) *2 No CT data collected (1), Deviation in CT image quality (1) |
||||||
| Adverse events | One SAE on one subject (0.42% (1/240)) was reported. Though the event was anticipated and serious, the patient reached remission after the revision surgery. The causal relationship with study devices and ASS technique have been denied by the chief principal investigator. | ||||||
| Outcome measures | 1 Primary Endpoint
1.1 Maintenance rate of the reduction position at 2-3 week postoperatively When the changes in the reduction position from the immediate postoperative period to 2-3 week postoperatively were compared between the ASS(+) group and the ASS(-) group after exclusion of cases which already have the lateral type on frontal view and/or the intramedullary type on lateral view in the immediate postoperative period, the proportion of cases whose reduction position was maintained in both frontal and lateral views was significantly higher in the ASS(+) group compared with the ASS(-) group (93.4%(99/106), 79.1%(87/110): P=0.002). 2 Secondary Endpoints 2.1 Surgery Time The surgery time in the ASS(+) group, which requires additional screw insertion procedure, was significantly longer than that of the ASS(-) group (P=0.003). 2.2 Effect of fracture type on CT imaging measurements Regardless of the fracture type (3part B, 4part), the sliding distance was significantly restrained in the ASS(+) group (P<0.001, =0.025). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of cases with sliding exceeding 4mm and the amount of displacement of the distal nail tip in the medullary cavity. 2.3 Effect of reduction position on CT imaging measurements In the ASS(+) group, the sliding distance and the proportion of cases with sliding exceeding 4mm were significantly restrained in cases with ideal reduction position (other than reduction position expressed as the lateral type on frontal view and/or the intramedullary type on lateral view) immediate postoperatively (P<0.001, =0.043). On the other hand, there was no difference in the amount of displacement of the distal nail tip in the medullary cavity between the two groups regardless of the postoperative reduction position (ideal or not ideal). 2.4 Effect of ASS on CT imaging measurements The sliding distance and the proportion of cases with sliding exceeding 4mm were significantly restrained in the ASS(+) group (P<0.001, =0.036). On the other hand, there was no difference in the amount of displacement of the distal nail tip in the medullary cavity between the two groups. |
||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000030594 |