Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000030733 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000030467 |
Scientific Title | Functional evaluation of the gastric conduits after esophagectomy using High Resolution Manometry (HRM) and 24hr-pH monitoring examination |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/01/09 |
Last modified on | 2025/01/14 10:04:29 |
Functional evaluation of the gastric conduits after esophagectomy using High Resolution Manometry (HRM) and 24hr-pH monitoring examination
Functional evaluation of the gastric conduits after esophagectomy using HRM and 24hr-pH monitoring examination
Functional evaluation of the gastric conduits after esophagectomy using High Resolution Manometry (HRM) and 24hr-pH monitoring examination
Functional evaluation of the gastric conduits after esophagectomy using HRM and 24hr-pH monitoring examination
Japan |
Esophageal Cancer
Gastrointestinal surgery |
Malignancy
NO
Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has a variety of surgical strategies in reconstructions using gastric conduits, which may affect the patients' postoperative daily-life activities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences of the physiological environment inside gastric conduits in each reconstruction strategy in terms of peristaltic intensity and digestive juice reflux, using a High Resolution Manometry (HRM) device and a 24-hour pH monitoring device.
Others
Physiological evaluation
Exploratory
1) Differences in peristaltic intensity among gastric conduit reconstruction strategies in the fasting state.
2) Differences in DeMeester scores/Time percentage below pH4 at the (remnant) esophagus levels among gastric conduit reconstruction strategies.
1) Changes in peristaltic intensity and frequency of peristalsis of the gastric conduit in each patient.
2) Correlation between the refluxive inflammation levels and the peristaltic intensity levels (include gross evaluations with endoscopic examinations).
3) Correlation between the refluxive inflammation levels and the DeMeester scores/Time percentage below pH4 at the (remnant) esophagus levels.
4) Correlation between the peristaltic intensity levels (include gross evaluations with endoscopic examinations) and the DeMeester scores/Time percentage below pH4 at the (remnant) esophagus levels.
5) Correlation between the nutritional markers (Onodera's prognostic nutritional index, serum PreAlb level, change in body weight)and the peristaltic intensity levels (include gross evaluations with endoscopic examinations).
6) Correlation between the nutritional markers (Onodera's prognostic nutritional index, serum PreAlb level, change in body weight)and the DeMeester scores/Time percentage below pH4 at the (remnant) esophagus levels.
7) Comparision between the postoperative patients and the preoperative patients in terms of periastaltic intensity levels and DeMeester scores/Time percentage below pH4 at the (remnant) esophagus levels.
8) Correlation between the lapsed months after the surgeries and the periastaltic intensity levels.
9) Correlation between the lapsed months after the surgery and the DeMeester scores/Time percentage below pH4 at the (remnant) esophagus levels.
10) Correlation between the QOL questionnaire results and the refluxive inflammation levels.
11) Completion rates of the examinations.
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Uncontrolled
YES
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
1
Diagnosis
Device,equipment |
1)Blood sampling at the outpatient ward before the examinations below (~5 munites).
2) Endoscopic examination of the gastric conduit under video fluoroscopy and the placement of a marking clip on the oral side near the Pylorus (~10 minutes).
3)Intranasal placement of the High Resolution Manometry (HRM) catheter through the gastric conduit and the recording of the manometric data during a fasting state (90 minutes).
4) Recording of the manometric data of the gastric conduit whlie swallowing diluted contrast under video fluoroscopy (~10 minutes).
5) Recording of the manometric data of the gastric conduit during the fed state after liquid meal intake (90 munites).
6) Removing the HRM catheter and intranasal placement of the 24-hour pH monitoring catheter for 24-hour pH recording (24 hours).
7) Removing the 24-hour pH catheter (5 minutes).
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
[Criteria for postoperative patitents]
1) Those who underwent esophagectomy with a gastric conduit reconstruction at The University of Tokyo Hospital.
2) 20 years of age or over and not more than 85 years old.
3) Not recieving current adjuvant therapies.
4) No current indications or past histories of recurrence.
5) No current malignancies in other organs.
6) Not hospitalized for treatments.
7) Whose H.Pylori infection status can be confirmed by endoscopic biopsy or blood test before the manometric measurement or 24-hour pH monitoring test.
8) Agreed to participate in the study in documents.
[Criteria for preoperative patitents]
1) superficial esophageal cancer patients (cT1a/bN0M0) without any previous or current systemic neoadjuvant therapies.
2) 20 years of age or over and not more than 85 years old.
3) No previous or current systemic therapy
4) No current malgnancies in other organs.
5) Not hospitalized for treatments.
6) Whose H.Pylori infection status can be onfirmed by endoscopic biopsy or blood test before the manometric measurement or 24-hour pH monitoring test.
7) Agreed to participate in the study in documents.
1) Spent less than 1 year after the surgery (except for preoperative patients).
2) Have contraindications to Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
3) Have contraindications to High Resolution Manometry examination, which are determined by the device distributor.
4) Have difficulties in completing 24-hour pH monitoring.
5) Have severe hoarseness and/or dysphagia and difficult to swallow with the catherters intranasally inserted.
6) Impossible to suspend drug intakes: enterokinetic agents, antiacid agents, cholinergic or anti-cholinergic agents for other diseases than esophageal cancer.
7) Proved to have residual food inside gastric conduit during esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
8) Have allergies with the drugs used in the study examination.
9) Pregnant.
10) Already participated in the study within 1 year.
11) Have other ineligible factors judged by the researchers of the study.
80
1st name | Yasuyuki |
Middle name | |
Last name | Seto |
Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo
Gastrointestinal Surgery
1138655
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
03-3815-5411
seto-tky@umin.ac.jp
1st name | Shuichiro |
Middle name | |
Last name | Oya |
Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo
Gastrointestinal Surgery
113-8655
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
03-3815-5411
OYAS-SUR@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp
University of Tokyo
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo
Self funding
none
Ethical comittee of the University of Tokyo
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
03-5841-3557
ethics@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp
NO
東京大学医学部附属病院(東京都)
2018 | Year | 01 | Month | 09 | Day |
Unpublished
Terminated
2017 | Year | 05 | Month | 02 | Day |
2017 | Year | 07 | Month | 11 | Day |
2017 | Year | 07 | Month | 12 | Day |
2021 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
2018 | Year | 01 | Month | 09 | Day |
2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 14 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000030467